X : You said you stopped researching on organisational structure ...
Me : ... I stopped experimenting (i.e. running organisations) in 2007. PST is where I got to. If you want to go beyond pioneer - settler - town planner then you'll need to find some experimenting in that space.
X : But you research on leadership?
Me : No, I more observe using population studies how organisations behaviour is changing. Hence - leadingedgeforum.turtl.co/story/on-indus…
X : So, surveying CEOs?
Me : No. Simpson's paradox. Take something like cloud, if you summarise the majority view they will tell you the wrong future i.e. the future is hybrid including on premise versus serverless in 2015 ...
... even by 2020, the aggregate CxO view is plainly wrong. So, no I don't "do" CxO studies, I look for population differences.
X : Do you have a big team to do this?
Me : Yes. Me.
X : Seriously?
Me : I'm an extremely reluctant leader, so I don't run teams. Instead I bring together groups of volunteers ... for the last research report that was 70 volunteers in 11 teams for a year.
X : Mapping?
Me : We use it, yes.
X : You seem to be leading groups of volunteers and a huge mapping community?
Me : I'm a very reluctant leader but that doesn't mean life is going to pay attention to this. I have a tendency to create groups, something I picked up from WoW.
X : WoW?
Me : World of Warcraft. Best management and leadership training tool that I know. You learn to "lead" by not "leading" in the traditional sense. A lot of creating consensus, momentum, motivation and interest.
X : So, you really are running global organisations (i.e. the mapping community, the research groups) even if you don't admit that they are organisations or that you're leading it.
Me : Hmmm.
X : I win?
Me : I suppose so.
X : So, what's next after PST then? You're obviously experimenting.
Me : There's a lot of stuff I like in DAOs (ignore the bitcoin / crypto stuff). Though my exposure to this suggests people are still not getting basic principles in place and focusing too much on process.
X : Is that your next research project?
Me : No. I'm intending to use maps across multiple industries to help identify where to invest safely. Too much is based upon "majority" view versus understanding population differences which nearly always leads to the wrong outcome.
X : How willl that go?
Me : I don't know, I haven't done it yet.
X : But, how will CxOs react to this?
Me : Depends. Same as all the other reports from Serverless to China.
X : What does that mean?
Me : If I'm talking to a CxO who is all about narrative and existing power structures and status symbols (i.e. how many people you employ, size of the top floor office) then if it doesn't agree with their narrative it'll hit a brick wall.
X : And?
Me : Oh, I honestly don't care.
X : Not very focused on the user need which you preach?
Me : Quite the opposite. It's very focused on the user need but that's not necessarily what the user wants. There's nothing I can do about wants. You might want the future to be something, doesn't make it so.
X : But what problem are you trying to solve?
Me : CxOs asking me how do they get an ROI on their $400M investment in big data when in reality they shouldn't have invested in the first place.
X : Does that happen?
Me : All the time.
I suppose, what I'm trying to do with this research project is to some small measure prevent more of this happening -
... I live in an industry which has huge failure rates for things which are entirely preventable.
X : But if those CxOs don't listen?
Me : Nothing I can do about that. Hence, it's not worth worrying or caring over. As I said "small measure", you try and help a few and let it spread slowly ... see mapping in general.
X : Why don't you lead teams?
Me : Well, as pointed out I do build communities and lead teams of volunteers ... my natural aversion to leadership is it's mentally and physically draining, so it's not something I seek as much as something that sneaks up on me ...
... I don't understand why anyone would willingly seek positions of leadership. I spent 5 years as a CxO and I reckon I aged 20 years in that. The body recovers but gosh ... I don't get it. Find happiness instead, if leadership is going to seek you out then deal with it then.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
X : What is web 3.0?
Me : A set of worthwhile experiments being tightly coupled to specific forms of crypto for reasons of greed leading to a dystopian society of excessive control and inequality through decentralisation and "choice" that most will be excluded from.
X : I thought Web 3.0 was semantic web?
Me : Did you really expect it to be called "More economic slavery for the masses","Neoliberalism a gogo" or "Our next business model is your children"? Web 3.0 gives it more "legitimacy". Tim BL talked about Web 3.0 and so it must be good.
X : The term has been co-opted?
Me : Yep and bundled with a healthy dose of crypto and greed. I would consider the term toxic despite any worthwhile experiments and noble intentions.
X : Will it succeed though?
Me : Will the pursuit of greed lead society along horrendous paths?
Tree is up and decorated, presents bought and wrapped, logs chopped, ... all the basics done. Today, some "me" time - hmmm, modding Skyrim. Oh, look a new update AE ... OMG, WTF, are they trying to kill off the modding community again just to force some creation club content?
One of these days, there will be a gaming company that doesn't try to regularly kill off its modding community in order to peddle some crap for a bit of extra cash but instead takes a radical approach of working with the community to improve the game ... I know, it's too radical.
But could you imagine what Skyrim could have become if Bethesda had actively worked with the community ... and yes, Bethesda is probably the best example of a company working with a community.
X : What machine do you use?
Me : For what?
X : PC?
Me : Fairly bog standard ... tower case, i9-10900K, 32Gb RAM, 1TB SSD, RTX 3070ti, liquid cooled, dual nics etc. It does everything I need it to. I like fiddling with machines so I build myself a new rig every few years.
X : So you built it?
Me : Bizarrely, this was a base unit that I just upgraded a few things on. I didn't have much time, I needed to build the wee lad a gaming machine.
X : What's the specs on that?
Me : Stonking. It's a beast.
X : Any advice on building a PC?
Me : Don't. Especially not now ... components can be difficult to get.
On pioneer, settler and town planner ... ok, first apologies for the awful naming. When I used the model fifteen years ago, I was thinking of more Viking settlers in Greenland and not the genocidal varieties. Still need to find better names ...
... there are some really important basics with this model.
2) Everyone gets to choose and to change. This is about attitudes required for a particular component / project. People change ... often. Allow them to choose and change their attitude as much as they need to. FFS don't tell someone what they are, ask them and let them change.
I do learn new and interesting terms from the wee lad. Apparently on the school ground today, "based" is a term used by fascists to describe someone with offensive views as being cool. I'm not sure what context I'd ever use that in but still ... language is always evolving.
Still, it's interesting to note that quite a bit of slang is used to communicate identity and membership of a group rather than to impart some other meaning and that children are becoming so aware of this. Maybe this has always been the case.
X : In what context was it used?
Me : As in ... "No-one likes [xyz], he calls things based" ... to which I had to ask what "based" meant.
X : Will AI do research?
Me : Odd question. AI is already involved in research - from literature searches to finding correlations to even creating hypothesis. It's quite far from the general purpose intelligence you need for causation but maybe in fifty years or so. Why?
X : How do you industrialise research?
Me : Well, you can industrialise components around research but if you're talking about genuine core research then it's in that genesis phase. You literally can't industrialise it.
X : What bits can you industrialise?
Me : Any surrounding components that use defined / known models i.e. publishing, finance, marketing, legal (contracts to patents), HR, admin ... even things like sales. Those would seem like obvious targets. You'd have to map it.