Don't mistake detail for information. Knowing technical details of things doesn't necessarily signal intelligence.
People who can (accurately) explain complex topics in simple ways have high signal-to-noise ratio b/c they know how to identify & filter out unimportant details.
The oldest trick in the book is using technical detail/jargon to attempt to signal intelligence, or as an obfuscation tactic to essentially deflect/escape an argument they can't win.
Engineers, scientists, & analysts do this often. It's easy to spot & very disingenuous IMO
Interestingly, this is one reason why the DoD pays for officers to attend esteemed engineering schools & get the highly technical degrees.
Makes it harder to BS military officers. You dont want your violence-wielders to be susceptible to BS.
If you look at the bios of all the high ranking officers, they usually have super impressive academic credentials.
Most US military officers spend a third of their career in some kind of educational environment.
Because we wield violence, we take our education super seriously.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
#Bitcoin is an urgent US national strategic priority. Here's a thread which explains my reasoning (this is a very short summary of my research as an active-duty officer & US National Defense Fellow).
One of my favorite quotes in military history is by General Ferdinand Foch, who… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
(2) But what if we are just as bad at seeing the bigger picture? What if there are new technologies around us today that we think about in the same vein? What if we are equally as guilty as General Foch was at failing to recognize how new technologies are about disrupt our… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
(3) The big idea that I explored in my research at MIT was that this new technology we call "Bitcoin" isn't just a coin at all. Instead of being just a new form of money or a new type of financial payment system – I believe that Bitcoin could more accurately be described as a new… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Presenting a twitter thread on #SOFTWAR by ChatGPT4
1/6) #SOFTWAR discusses the national strategic security implications of proof-of-work technologies like Bitcoin, but first, it provides some background information on the profession of warfighting and the neologism "softwar."… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
2/6) In the early 1800s, General Clausewitz examined the nature of war and defined it as a trinity with three distinct characteristics. First, he said that war is comprised of the same "blind natural forces" of "primordial violence" observed in nature. This means that physical… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
3/6) Second, Clausewitz stated that war contains "the play of chance and probability" rewarding "creative spirits." This means that war is not just an indiscriminate physical power competition, but a probabilistic one – a.k.a. a lottery. Winning the power lottery is not merely… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Announcing the public debut of SOFTWAR, a theory presented to OPOTUS, OSECDEF, & the Joint Chiefs about the national strategic significance of #Bitcoin
You guys are conflating what the public did in support of Zimmerman & following the Zimmerman case, with what Zimmerman's Lead Defense ACTUALLY DID in court to get the US District of California drop all charges. What Dubois ACTUALLY did was...
NOT deny that PGP was a munition or that it violated the Arms Export Control Act. Instead, he went on the counteroffensive & questioned the constitutionality of a law that prohibits the public from using a non-lethal munition to secure them against their own government.
It wasn't until AFTER Dubois started sowing doubt in the 2nd amendment constitutionality of the Arms Export Control Act that the US Attorney General's Office backed off. The govt was like "oh shit" and dropped charges b/c they knew that was a huge risk.
I reached out to Zimmerman's Lead Defense Lawyer, Phil Dubois today, to see if he would be willing to discuss how he used the 1st *AND* 2nd amendment to defeat the US Attorney General Office's attempt to claim that PGP should be export controlled under Arms Export Control Act...
What is so annoying to me is that ppl don't realize that Zimmerman had OVERWHELMING support *BECAUSE* the govt classified cryptography as arms. Debois did NOT win the PGP case by denying that PGP violated the Arms Export Control Act, he won the case by questioning...
the constitutionality of banning people access from NON-LETHAL ARMS via the Export Control Act by virtue of the 2nd amendment... @denverbitcoin@WakeToBitcoin@Croesus_BTC