To the experts insisting “N95s are useless if not fit-tested”
Have you ever tried to fit test a “well-fit surgical mask” or “3 layered well-fit cloth mask”?
TLDR they are inferior.
A brief case series and 🧵
1/15
There are two type of fit tests, 1) quantitative fit testing - a portacount machine measures the concentration of aerosol outside the mask versus inside the mask and 2) qualitative fit testing - a potent bitter or sweet aerosolized solution is inhaled under a hood
2/15
I underwent quantitative fit testing on a surgical mask, suboptimally fit KN95 and well fit CN99 (FFP3). The results were intuitive. The surgical mask, while still offering some protection, performed the worst.
A basic nebulizer + 3M bitrex solution + plastic bag = DIY qualitative fit test.
5/15
Inhaling the nebulized bitter solution without a mask is almost immediately overpowering for most people (some people aren’t able to taste the standard bitrex solution, thus always important to test with no mask first)
6/15
I repeated the experiment with two ASTM 3 surgical masks. The bitter taste hit my taste buds within 5-10 seconds. Clearly suboptimal protection for aerosols.
Note- ASTM std is primarily for high velocity liquid spray protection & was NOT designed to protect inhalation
7/15
I “passed” my brief DIY experiment using CAN99 vitacore, CAN95 vitacore, 3M Vflex, ASTM 3 surgical mask with fix-the-mask brace to improve the seal, envomask N95, and DenTec P100 Elastomeric
8/15
My next family participant was tested on a vitacore ASTM3 surgical mask and the 3M vflex.
His tastebuds remained bitter-free with both masks. The surgical mask happened to fit his face very well with a tight seal all around.
3M Vflex sealed well and was more comfortable
9/15
Next family participant only tested his mask of choice, the 3M Vflex respirator- he remained bitter-taste free after a minute of inhaling the concentrated solution.
10/15
My next participant was unable to taste the bitrex, thus couldn’t complete the experiment. However, the CAN95 vitacore ear loop mask (with silicone toggles to tighten the loops) appeared to seal her face well.
11/15
My final participant was a good sport and tested a few masks. First up was a vitacore CAN95 ear loop mask with nose bridge pre-flattened and silicone toggles on the loops to tighten the fit. This appeared to fit her face well.
It successfully blocked the bitrex taste.
12/15
Her next mask was a high quality 3 layer cloth mask, which appeared to fit her face well.
Unfortunately, she failed within 10-15 seconds of inhaling the bitrex.
13/15
Finally, she tested an ASTM3 surgical mask.
Not surprisingly, given the visible cheek gaps, she failed with this one as well.
14/15
Unless you’ve inhaled bitrex under a DIY bag hood, don’t assume your cloth mask or surgical mask is offering superior protection. It will always be better than no mask, but we need to choose #BetterMasks and #BestMasks to end this pandemic
When the science and our understanding evolves, it’s important to communicate this clearly and concisely to the public rather than fall back on nuance and shades of gray. Even when this means admitting that previous messaging was incorrect.
Side tweet - Probably could have saved some pages by omitting the giant shades of gray diagram - not a difficult concept
I wear an N95 respirator to protect myself, my patients, my colleagues and my family. Blocking inhalation and exhalation of potentially infectious particles just makes sense during a respiratory pandemic. #PerfectFit on the PortaCount #SayNoToSafetyStewardship#FreshAirWeCare
Because a fit factor of 5 (20% leak) - when quietly breathing through a surgical mask - isn’t respiratory protection. #BewareOfMaskNostrils #BYOPPE
My mask solution earlier in pandemic was a mask brace to optimize my fit. Have since switched to N95s to optimize filtration (respirator material meets higher testing standards) and function (N95 easier to put on, more comfortable, more breathable). #MacGyverYourMask
“During the great COVID pandemic of 2020, you may be shocked to learn that many international ID experts believed that respiratory viruses spread primarily through fomites and eyes, rather than the more obvious route - inhalation...”
“As the pandemic swept across the globe, and cases grew, so did the evidence supporting aerosol transmission. The increased risk in shared indoor air and poorly ventilated spaces and decreased risk outdoors was plain for all to see.”
“The paradigm shift was accepted swiftly by some. Others held firm. Some even postulated that the decreased risk outdoors was related to a mysterious germicidal substance in outdoor air, rather than the obvious answer- dilution.”
Current IPAC policies are heavily weighted towards preventing droplet/fomites spread and active nosocomial outbreaks are blamed on HCWs for not tying gowns correctly, other donning/doffing errors, not wearing proper face shield, etc
Number of studies that have successfully cultured Covid from used hospital gowns/gloves/HCW hands/face shields? 0️⃣
Number that have found SARS-CoV-2 RNA on these items? 0️⃣
Only positive RNA sample on “PPE” was 1 sample on the front of 1 shoe...
I summarized the evidence for airborne spread of Measles vs. COVID-19 in a table
The results were quite shocking to me ...
How is it that we are still discussing whether or not #COVIDisAirborne??
1/
The disease on the left is managed with airborne precautions, including respiratory protection (N95/respirator) and ventilation optimization
2/
In Canada, the disease on the right is still managed with droplet and contact precautions (gowns, gaping surgical masks with substandard filtration efficiencies, gloves, face shields and plenty of hygiene theatre)
3/