Were Imam Abu Hanifah and his companions Murji'ah when they made the statement, 'Iman doesn't increase and decrease'?
It is pretty self evident by what Imam Abu Hanifah meant by this statement as we look at the proofs and explanations his own students give. Let's have a look.
Imām Abu Yusuf:
"I am a true believer, and I am a believer in the sight of Allah. I do not say: My Iman is like the Iman of Jibrīl & Mīkā'īl a.s."
Imam Muhammad:
It is Makrūh for a man to say: My Iman is like the Iman of Jibrīl. But we do say, I believe in that what Jibrīl &
Mīkā'īl believe in. (I.e. the articles of faith). And we do not say: My Iman is like the Iman of Abu Bakr R.a. However, we do say: I believe in that which Abu Bakr r.a. believes in."
The fact that Imam Abu Yusuf and Muhammad state that the Iman is not like the Iman of the angels and Abu Bakr r.a. proves that they meant howness or conviction in the belief and not the beliefs themselves. Whereas, when they said Iman doesn't increase nor decrease, they meant
the articles of Iman do not increase and decrease as Imam Abu Yusuf and Muhammad state, we believe in the same thing as Jibrīl & Mīkā'īl and Abu Bakr r.a.
[Bustān al-'Ārifīn Page 125 - Abu Layth as-Samarqandi]
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1- We are all in agreement that the 'Arsh is creation [if it is not then you have committed blasphemy]
2- We are all in agreement that Allah's names indicate towards his attributes and that they are pre eternal.
3- Was Allah not الأعلى before he created the creation?
[If no then you have affirmed change for Allah]
Now in regards to the narration itself, it is an obligatory view that Allah is The Most High, regardless of the creation being existent or not. This means, even before Allah created the 'Arsh, he was above it all.
In the issue of Imam Muhammad's statement, the Sifāt are derived from the Qur'an and Sunnah. Hereby, another principal needs mentioning (I also slightly touched upon this before).
- The Sifāt of Allah have different levels of Shubhah, some contain more ambiguity than others. Yet, all are Mutashabih. For example, the Sifaat Aqliyyah are more easily known due to the fact that they are attributes which can not only be known by the Qur'an and Sunnah, rather
they can be known by mere intellect.
For example, the sifah of qudrah. If Allah had no ability, then we would exist. Yet again, we do not know what this attribute actually is while we are clearer about knowing what Allah would carry out with this attribute due to the clearer
Ahlus Sunnah do not touch upon the Sifaat of Allah and leave them as they are, and pass them on as they came without explanation (of the Sifah) without kayf.
In contrast to this person who is translating the Quranic texts and is doing Tahrif of the attributes of Allah by
Just because a word, term or a phrase was not cited; this does not mean that the concept behind isn't existent.
When we say Allah is Ahad with all His attributes, of course we have derived this from the Qur'an. Allah does not and cannot share a meaning, Kayfiyyah, attribute
action and many more with the creation. This is why the Maturidi and Ash'ari scholars emphasise on the point regarding Tawhīd, that one must acknowledge that Allah is ONE in every aspect. If Allah were to even share 0.001% in any aspect, with His creation, this would
also mean that Allah is still not completely different from His creation and His creation is not completely different from Him.
ليس كمثله شيئ
Nothing is like Him.
So if you apply the meanings of creation to Allah, how are you negating similarity in an entity?
Uthmān bin Sa'īd ad-Dārimī (d. 280) mentions in his 'Radd 'alā al Marīsī':
ولو قدشاء لاستقر على ظهر بعوضة فاستقلتْ به بقدرته ولطفه ربوبيته، فكيف على عرش عظيم؟
„If he [Allah] willed, he would have settled upon the back of a mosquito, thereafter it [mosquito] could take a hold of him [meaning fly him away] by His power and kindness of lordship. So how would [it be with Allah] on the throne?“