@DavidManOnFire@insiderfilms1 To even begin the understand the history surrounding facsist RW White Supremacists one needs to deal squarely with the wholly foundational pathology of White Supremacy as it is, was and continues to be deeply embedded in US White Culture. To ignore that and only look at the
1/
@DavidManOnFire@insiderfilms1 history of fascism (which is the same thing by another name) only deals with quote unquote post-foundational 19th century events according to what WP take note of. I could say this goes back to OK City, Ruby Ridge as he WACO and I wouldn't be wrong, but it's a half truth and
2/
It's not a question of who started WS but rather who in majority continues to maintain it and surprisingly it's NOT EXTREMISTS. It's one thing to inherit an unequal system and quite another to continue to maintain it by
3/
@DavidManOnFire@insiderfilms1 inaction under the guise of "I didn't do it", incremental changes that amount to nothing in the reality, and voting; these candidates don't get into Government by themselves nor does FOX command to largest cable audience because of candidates. The plain truth no one seems
4/
@DavidManOnFire@insiderfilms1 willing to deal with it that in the end it IS the Silent White Mod Maj who, as beneficiary bystanders with a vested interest in not voting away their own or their sons White privilege and power, routinly votes for the most hateful candidates that promise, for this or that
5/
@DavidManOnFire@insiderfilms1 economic or social reason, to maintain status quo White Supremacy. And they are NOT the WP you think of that continue to act this way. The great lie is that the Silent White Mod Maj isnt who is maintaining status quo White Supremacy but that WS is a function of extremists.
6/
@DavidManOnFire@insiderfilms1 Not only is this not the case but extremists are allowed free reign UNTIL THEY THREATEN THE MAJORITY OF WHITE SOCIETY'S STABILITY which then allows White Society to pull them back from the edge via the great White American compromise of returning to status quo White Supremacy
7/
@DavidManOnFire@insiderfilms1 while patting themselves on the back for having saved everyone from the extremists who then go underground to get ready for the next round. AND THIS IS A PREDICTABLE PATTERN. If WP are serious about turning the tide for good they will focus on
8/
@DavidManOnFire@insiderfilms1 Oh Im aware & I don't disagree with that but I do vehemently dispute how you use those facts in constructing your premise. Primarily b/c RUSSIA IS IN NO WAY CAUSAL FOR US WHITE SUPREMACY (WS) nor t/sadistic pathology spawned by it resulting in gen after gen of WPs greedy
1/
@DavidManOnFire@insiderfilms1 attachment to privilege & power such that WP continue that process forsaking in all ways the Democracy they give such lipservice to in order to maintain WS in perpetuity.
Albeit tho the clothing of WS changes to suit the going narrative or times, the substance of White
2/
@DavidManOnFire@insiderfilms1 privilege and power and what that means for the rest of us DOES NOT CHANGE. And that is the real problem; not Russia.
To the degree you deflect to other countries and people to distract from real causes of the pathology that WS is vs dealing with the character weakness &
3/
"We found that the virus was accurately detected by the rapid antigen test in 87% of patients with COVID-19 symptoms and in 71% of those who were asymptomatic"
Said another way 30% of SUPERSPREADING Delta and Omicron
2/
@sprzyslp@imillhiser You mean that great White society that NEVER WAS right?
Johnsons failure was his refusal to ensure enforcible equality, and instead aligned with the SIGNIFICANTLY COMPROMISED CRA VRA & FHA b/c he was racist & centrist. What Johnson knew was Af-Am had had enuf & a change of
1/
@sprzyslp@imillhiser clothing (ie., a temporary comprise) was necessary to keep White America & the country running.. and that's the bottom line: CRA VRA ABD FHA was more about GDP & the industry profits end of the BIZ of US Gov and that's just how it went down. Johnson knew it'd take a minute
2/
@sprzyslp@imillhiser but not because of some great White society that never was but to gain the stability necessary to reassure US WHITE CENTRIST MODERATE MAJORITY SOCIETY THAT EQUALITY DIDN'T MEAN LOSING THEIR WHITE PRIVILEGE & POWER.
He knew CRA VRA AND FHA would soon be WHOLLY UNDERMINED &
3/
You mean that great White society that NEVER WAS right?
Johnsons failure was his refusal to ensure enforcible equality, and instead aligned with the SIGNIFICANTLY COMPROMISED CRA VRA & FHA b/c he was racist & centrist. What Johnson knew was Af-Am had had enuf & a change of 1/
clothing (ie., a temporary comprise) was necessary to keep White America & the country running.. and that's the bottom line: CRA VRA ABD FHA was more about GDP & the industry profits end of the BIZ of US Gov and that's just how it went down. Johnson knew it'd take a minute
2/
but not because of some great White society that never was but to gain the stability necessary to reassure US WHITE CENTRIST MODERATE MAJORITY SOCIETY THAT EQUALITY DIDN'T MEAN LOSING THEIR WHITE PRIVILEGE & POWER.
He knew CRA VRA AND FHA would soon be WHOLLY UNDERMINED &
3/
THREAD: The military has stripped more than one general of rank & benies in retirement for far less (the list includes adulterous affairs, cashing bad checks, strip club charges on a stolen Fed Gov CC, coerced sex (rape by another name) the whole "fat leanoard" affair 1/
then SURELY FLYNN QUALIFIES FOR MUCH MUCH WORSE.
Course who gets charged punished & stripped of rank and benies seems to have more to do with who you know, or whose back you had and may still have vs not.
My point here is if the military believes those charges and penalities
2/
to be meritorious surely Flynns illegal lobbying for foreign governm'ts KNOWN TO BE ENEMIES OF THE STATE AND WORKING TO OVERTHROW FED GOV QUALIFIES FOR FAR WORSE
For comparison see the following;
1) Former Major General Demoted in Retirement for Using Credit Card at
2/
@BwanaLawFirm@duty2warn It's my understanding (tho you'd know way more) that it's an impeachable offense for a SCOTUS nominee to lie to congress when being vetted for an appointment and if found to have merit that is grounds for removal. What I don't know and can't find is if any of the rulings
1/
@BwanaLawFirm@duty2warn pertaining to case law they lied about could be reversed after the fact. I'd think despite any reasonable interpretation of questions asked during the current case, until a ruling over turning Roe v. Wade is handed down, there is no way to find impeachable grounds as the
2/
@BwanaLawFirm@duty2warn ruling itself would be the decisive evidence. I also believe the SCOTUS 5 will stack the deck meaning Roberts (no one ever believes me when I tell them Roberts is positively diabolical but he is) will write the majority opinion in such a way as to appear to have arrived at a
3/