Today we find out if the insane rants of my anonymised trans accuser (the victim) is legitimised by the police. Here is a small sample (I have pages of it) of the history of police informer Mrs B. @CollegeofPolice and @CCLeeFreeman withheld it from the High Court. Wonder why?
“My partner is a Hells Angel… what’s it like to have sex with your sister?” Says anonymised police informer Mrs B…. The trans woman @CCLeeFreeman granted anonymity to.
Cannot imagine why they hid this, can you?
Mrs B… Honey Badger and police informant. @threadreaderapp unroll.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
This is the Chief whose force was compared to the Stasi, who says ‘Common sense is not appropriate for the police’ & who spent over 100k defending the right to criminalise women for saying they know the difference between lads and lasses. @Humberbeat@HumbersidePCC
This is the Chief who resolutely stands by @stonewalluk, who refuses to accept that Pride is political, and who flies this flag outside its new £14 million custody suite…
This is the Chief who covered up the history of his star witness in order to dupe the High Court into granting an anonymity order to a lunatic with a long history of threatening VaWG (sic). Watch this space.
1. Police excel at recording themselves as victims of hate but give themselves a pass when the boot’s on the other foot. ‘We investigated ourselves and our motives were found to be pure’ says @leicspolice in relation to its riot shield investigation.
2. Despite notching up 120,000 NCHIs against individual members of the public for saying stuff like ‘My cat is a Methodist’ or whistling Bob The Builder, @leicspolice have decided the rules do not apply to them.
3. That’s odd. Because @CollegeofPolice guidance insists that the police do NOT check for motive and must believe the perception of the victim. Hence @HarryTheOwl101 and @SVPhillimore both have NCHIs attached to their names for 6 years, with no possibility of appeal.
1. Had a call from @leicspolice yesterday re the riot shield. Where to start? So, our complaint was recorded as a Non Crime Hate Incident (NCHI) on the basis that I perceived the shield as hateful. So far so good.
2. However, the NCHI was not recorded against an officer’s name… which is in contrast to the standard practice of labelling a person as ‘suspect’ & ruining their job prospects for the next 6 years. Convenient.
3. The reason for this is as follows: the police judge their own actions to be pure and hate free. Political colours on a riot shield are an act of solidarity and support - not an act of antagonism and hostility. So they are free to continue with the deployment.
At a webinar about hate crime in Scotland! Now listening to a 'tactical hate crime adviser' from Glasgow who is talking about role of police Scotland.
Interestingly and worrying, they are going to talk about impact of hate crime on CHILDREN. And urge all questions to be 'respectful'. This is an emotive topic which you may find upsetting.
Learning objectives - for attendees to define a hate crime, to name the protected characteristics and identify different types of crime that can be motivated by prejudice and guide you through the hate crime form.
As @MerseyPolice are warning us not to be transphobic whilst refusing to tell us what transphobia is, it falls on us to provide the working definition, kindly offered by @stonewalluk
Note: if you deny the existence of ‘gender identity’, you automatically fall foul of @MerseyPolice. If you consider sex to be binary then you automatically fall foul of the police.
What’s more, if you say nice things about Dame Jenni Murray or JK Rowling you are in danger of being recorded as a transphobe by @MerseyPolice.