I'm going to interview @kerima_cevik, autistic mother of a nonspeaking autistic man, about the structures that perpetuate the cycle of violence and murder of nonspeaking autistic people by their family and caregivers. Kerima requested this topic.
Here are some of the things you can expect us to talk about:
The media speak strongly against people who murder their children, and the normal public response is, "Those poor babies!"
...unless the children are disabled.
Then media sympathy switches towards the murderer. Why is there so little concern for the victim?
In South Africa, lockdowns led to a massive increase in domestic violence.
Elsewhere, COVID-19 restrictions also spelled an increase risk of parents murdering their children. Kerima, who's from the US, will be discussing this in our upcoming Twitter Space.
[In case it isn't amply clear: the subject here is the murder of disabled children, and especially autistic children, by their parents or caregivers. This is your content warning.]
Kerima will also be talking about the negative impact of ableist online parenting groups, organisations, and social media on parents and other carers, and how the contribute to a culture that leads to #filicide.
One of the first spin-off topics that is raised when someone murders the disabled child in their care is how they were'failed by the system, and how services were lacking. Kerima will talk about this too; but be ready for a different perspective from what you usually hear here.
There are certain (often undiagnosed) conditions in carers that can contribute to the predisposition to commit murder. Kerima will touch on some of these issues.
What are some of the ways to avert filicide? What can be done to reduce the risk of parents murdering their disabled children?
Join us on Sunday to get direction from veteran human rights activist @kerima_cevik.
One things that stood out for me was the realisation that for murderers whose crimes were blamed on poor support, there was SO much evidence of them having refused support; and one of the red flags was their stance of "Cure autism or bust," which inevitably came down to "bust".
This also gave me insight into why the public think of them as good but desperate parents who'd do "anything" to help their child. The public often sees a determined refusal to accept disability as a POSITIVE thing, whereas in all these cases, it's actually a BAD thing.
The public also doesn't usually see disabled people (or autistic people with high support needs, particularly) as being knowledgeable about what helps and what doesn't help people like themselves.
Famous autism celebrity's solution to autistic people with high support needs: Sometimes you got no choice, honey, you just gotta murder these people.
Did he EVER ask ANY nonspeaking incontinent people what they...?
Why does this man have a platform? Why are murder apologists profiled, but murder victims are not mourned?
Do you know that there are SURVIVORS of murder attempts among us, whose parents who tried to kill them still walk free?
One of them is one of my best friends. She has a restraining order against her mother, and struggles to live on her own because of unmet support needs.
One of the perpetrators even wrote a book in which she describes how she tried to murder her child. She charges exorbitant fees for ABA and is expanding her torture empire.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Thank you for your interest in our Bad Autism Study. This study is based on previous bad autism studies, but with some enhancements and extra questions to make it worse. If you're a veteran participant in bad autism studies, you'll recognise some old questions.
The Bad Autism Study takes the form of a series of polls over the next few weeks. You can withdraw at any time, but you must answer all the questions.
You will not be compensated for your participation, but your effort may help the researcher get a postgraduate qualification.
When you're an autism organisation run by ABA promotors and you choose to have your autism conference in a country 🇬🇭 that also happens to be one of the most notorious for its abuse of LGBTQ+ people, then we need less reminding that ABA and #ConversionTherapy are the same thing.
Inferences about autistic people's body language, made by others who don't understand autism (this includes the majority of 'autism experts'), has led to enormous and widespread human rights violations.
The accusation and trial of Matthew Rushin was problematic for many reasons (some described in this article). One of the problems was that his body language was interpreted as guilt. neuroclastic.com/where-is-the-t…
There seems to be a TV/movie trope in which autistic adults are presented in a poignant, light-hearted way as having real but childlike adult relationships; and there's ALWAYS a sage grown-up allistic coach figure, to guide them in how to do it in the Proper (neurotypical) Way.
Can you name some TV shows and movies where you've seen this?
This is what made me realise that the Eternal Children and the Normalising Sage is a trope.
Oh my goodness, what I am learning about the lived experience of temporal lobe epilepsy is mind-blowing! People can be misdiagnosed with psychological whatnots for years, and be gaslighted into oblivion because of the arrogant ignorance of psych professionals! This is terrible!
We need to distinguish clearly between these terms:
🔷 Disease
🔷 Disorder
🔷 Disability
🔷 Difference
The way we conceptualise and define them translates into the way we treat people, situations and conditions.
The impact on society is immense.
I'm something of a relativist when it comes to some of these: I accept that there are different models and views of some of these, and it's not so much a matter of whether they're right or wrong, but whether they are helpful or not.
And determining THAT depends on our overall life-guiding paradigm and values.