It took less than two years for the police to convince politicians and the media to initiate a whole new phase of mass incarceration at a time when crime remains at historic lows.
Absolutely none of what they’re doing has anything to do with the facts. Crime is down, but the narrative is all about a “crime wave.” Theft/property crime is at historic lows, but the news is “retail theft wave.” Police have more $$ than ever but say they “don’t have resources.”
The one crime that *has* increased is shootings/homicides from shootings. But notice they aren’t talking about diverting police resources to focus on solving homicides. Instead it’s more money for targeting drug use or homelessness. It’s all fake narratives and fear-mongering.
And the media will spend months fanning the flames, quoting police unions as if they’ve ever told the truth. Then in the fine print they’ll mention that actually the data doesn’t support any of what was said but whatever just publish the lies anyway with the crime wave headline.
Look. At. The. Facts. Cities that *reduced* arrests for low level issues historically have had larger declines in crime and fewer homicides than cities that follow police narratives and increase enforcement. AND these cities reduced police shootings too. fivethirtyeight.com/features/polic…
Meanwhile, the same police unions pretending to be “tough on crime” are supporting politicians who make it easier for people to buy guns and then don’t solve the vast majority of shootings. So shootings are basically decriminalized and encouraged but RETAIL THEFT is the focus?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The FBI might end their use of force data collection program without posting any of their data. It’s probably because of what their data would say about policing. A thread. (1/x)
Back in 2015/16, the FBI started a use of force data program after Fatal Encounters and Mapping Police Violence, then WaPo and the Guardian, embarrassed the feds by tracking 2-3x more police killings than the ~400 cases/year the government claimed existed. mappingpoliceviolence.org
The federal program tracks killings *and* serious injuries by police. In states that already track this data (like CA), there are *even larger racial disparities* than in killings data alone. HALF of all people harmed in these incidents are UNARMED. data-openjustice.doj.ca.gov/sites/default/…
In fact, given the obscene rates of Covid in Florida and the Governor’s policy encouraging this spread, Ron DeSantis might single-handedly pose more of a threat to the lives of law enforcement in the state than any other human being.
Black men have higher college enrollment rates than white men at every income group. But Black college graduates end up with only 2/3 as much wealth as white high school dropouts because of systemic racism. insightcced.org/wp-content/upl…
I’m surprised this isn’t a larger part of the conversation on white male college enrollment rates. White men aren’t going college, perhaps, because existing systemic advantages allow them to obtain more wealth than other groups regardless.
Despite having 58% of the US Black population, the South has remained under white domination throughout history (except for maybe Reconstruction). Voter suppression has enabled white reactionaries to hold the majority (often supermajority) of Southern state and federal offices.
Narrow exceptions to this are the CBC in the US House, where Congressional districts were designed intentionally to break through this white dominant structure. And now we’re seeing Senators like Warnock who put a dent in the Senate demographics. But the overall dynamic remains.
It’s still almost all white (and Republican) governors, state legislative majorities, US Senators, and Electoral Votes coming from the South. By design. Maybe VA and GA (we’ll see about FL, but not optimistic) are starting to break that trend, but it’s the longstanding dynamic.
The FBI use of force data collection is a joke. They track substantially fewer incidents than we’ve already published online at mappingpoliceviolence.org and they say they won’t publicly share their data anytime soon. A distraction.
They could supplement their data collection by referencing media reports and existing databases (MPV, Fatal Encounters, WaPo) but instead they decided to rely *solely* on voluntary data collection from 18,000 police agencies, 73% of which aren’t currently choosing to participate.
They could decide to publish the data they *have* collected, which covers 27% of agencies. At least we could do something with that. But nope, the FBI decided they won’t share any department-level data until 80% of law enforcement participates - which likely will never happen.