Until a couple of weeks ago, I had never spoken directly Dr. George Fareed (@GeorgeFareed2), even though I had worked up the statistics and paper for Dr. Tyson's and Dr. Fareed's patients at All Valley Urgent Care in SoCal.
I had talked with Brian Tyson numerous times, interviewed with him once, and met him in San Juan. But never George.
roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/the-san-juan…
roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/the-san-juan…
When you talk to George (I'll call him that), you realize how gentle and sincere the man is. There is no mistaking it. And while working on the new Tyson/Fareed book, I got to see George's collection of video testimonials. It's...incredible.
While watching these, ask yourself why the world isn't paying attention to 7,000 patients treated early, with only 4 hospitalizations and 0 deaths. Why?!
Does anyone think these are actors?
I really don't think these are actors.
I really don't think these are actors.
A lot of these patients would have recovered, with or without medicine, I suspect.
Most likely, some of them would have spent time in the hospital, and a few may very well have died (most likely).
Most likely, some of them would have spent time in the hospital, and a few may very well have died (most likely).
George's medical partner and coauthor was just booted from Twitter. Because he has grounds to argue against the narratives that #hydroxychloroquine and #ivermectin most likely saved a lot of lives at his clinics?
https://twitter.com/EduEngineer/status/1473092010986950656?s=20
Some of these are higher risk patients. What explains the 0% mortality rate in Imperial County, which has hovered closer to 3% during the pandemic, if not the antivirals?
Should they have sat at home and grown sicker instead of seeking "dangerous" vitamins, zinc, HCQ, and IVM?
No, a couple of WHO trials did not, and could not logically prove the inefficacy of HCQ. That makes no sense. If one good protocol works well, that's a solution. 
And it certainly doesn't look like the WHO really tried to get it right.
But it looks to me like some doctors did get it right.
roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/the-chloroqu…
roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/the-chloroqu…
A lot of researchers got it right, too, though you wouldn't know that watching the mainstream media, or listening to the FDA or CDC "leadership".
Are we don't yet?
Heroes are never done until the job is over.
Heroes are never done until the job is over.
Wave 1: ~1600 treated at AVUC, 0 deaths
Wave 2: ~2400 treated at AVUC, 0 deaths
Wave 3: ~3000 treated at AVUC, 0 deaths
No waning efficacy.
Wave 2: ~2400 treated at AVUC, 0 deaths
Wave 3: ~3000 treated at AVUC, 0 deaths
No waning efficacy.
Actually, there were 3 deaths, but not from early treatment. Patients who came in late, after more than a week of illness, sometimes dying the day they arrived.
But nobody treated in the first week perished.
But nobody treated in the first week perished.
How many of these before it's not an anecdote?
I get it. These videos prove nothing. And they don't. Not in isolation. If 7000 patients with 4 hospitalizations and 0 deaths doesn't prove something, then "proof" is not what we should be discussing.
Adding this to tallies by other doctors including Brian Procter, Vladimir Zelenko, Heather Gessling, Ben Marble, Peter McCullough, and others (check the book), we get to 100,000 or so patients with a 99.97% survival rate, which is 98% lower mortality than the rest of the U.S.
But we'll soon all be censored off this platform, I suspect, so view it and share it now. While you can.
@threadreaderapp unroll
When they limit the tweets, we know how to get around that.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
