One thing about web3 is for absolute certain: a lot of very smart people — either the true believers, or the howling skeptics — are going to end up looking like utter fools. The strength of opinion on radically different sides is really remarkable.
The more I try to wrap my head around the web3 claims, the more it looks to me like no more or less than history’s greatest pump & dump scheme.

And yet, people I consider smart, well-informed non-grifters are absolute believers.

But where’s the lie here? networked.substack.com/p/web3-i-have-…
Part of the issue is that there is so much pseudo-politics underpinning both the enthusiasm and skepticism over web3. To wit:
My instinct is that we are in 1999: expect a lot of petsdotcom- & webvan-style disasters, along with a few big-time winners who are building foundational technology while claiming piously that, unlike the previous round of internet supervillains, THEY won’t be evil after they win

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nils Gilman

Nils Gilman Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @nils_gilman

19 Feb
Many commentators have tended to depict the sea change that began in 1979 (with the election of Thatcher and the Volcker shock) as a kind of clear rupture – a “victory for neoliberalism” and defeat for older Keynesian models. That was not how it felt at the time. THREAD:
The 1980s experienced continued contestation over economic models in the Global North, with Reagan practicing “military Keynesianism” at home, with the E. European socialist model creaking but still seemingly permanent, etc. What we now call neoliberalism was heavily contested.
In fact, the place where “neoliberalism” was first deployed in full measure was not in the 1980s Global North, but in the 1980s Global South, where rolling debt crises enabled the imposition of structural adjustment loans that rolled back developmental-welfare states.
Read 6 tweets
24 Nov 20
I propose the concept of “platformentality,” which concerns how tech platforms direct users’ conduct through positive means & the willing (if not knowing) participation of those in the network. (This is in contrast to Zuboff’s crypto-Marxist concept of “surveillance capitalism.”)
The key point is that *a network is not a society.* Therefore the models of analysis and intervention that made sense when discussing the society of a nation-state are simply not fit for purpose when dealing with networks.
One answer to this that some people have had is to force networks back into national containers, so that the old political and regulatory frameworks can be applied. This will work only to the extent that the global connectivity promise of Internet is abandoned.
Read 4 tweets
17 Oct 20
Re-upping this point, with another thread below.
“Structural adjustment” is usually understood narrowly to mean the conditional lending programs, imposed on poor countries (usually amid debt crises) in order to get them to agree to the reforms which by 1990 became known as "the Washington Consensus."
But a fuller understanding of the global history of "structural adjustment" would have to go well beyond this, to include three additional crucial stories.
Read 6 tweets
13 Sep 20
"Political violence in democracies often seems spontaneous. But in fact, the crisis has usually been building for years, and the risk factors are well known. The United States is now walking the last steps on that path." - @RachelKleinfeld washingtonpost.com/outlook/americ…
I've been sounding the warning for years...
Read 4 tweets
26 Aug 20
Americans struggle to envision how the US may be faced with a new civil war, because we think a civil war entails massed armies fighting set piece battles over territory. But we’re not in the 19th century any more, & that’s not how wars (including civil wars) get fought nowadays.
Nowadays wars (including civil wars) get fought with information operations, “little green men,” targeted assassinations, and cyberattacks designed mainly to demoralize & disorient the adversary.

Seen from that perspective, Civil War 2.0 has ALREADY begun in the United States.
The future is already here, it’s just unevenly distributed
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(