🧵Jan. 6 comm to Jim Jordan: “We understand that you had at least one & possibly multiple communications with Pres. Trump on Jan. 6th. We would like to discuss each such communication with you in detail. & we also wish to inquire about any communications you had
“on January 5th or 6th with those in the Willard War Room, the Trump legal team, White House personnel or others involved in organizing or planning the actions and strategies for January 6th.” january6th.house.gov/sites/democrat…
“…you may also have info about meetings with WH officials & the then-President in Nov. & Dec. 2020, & early-Jan. 2021, about strategies for overturning the results of the 2020 election. We would also like to ask you about any discussions involving the possibility of
“presidential pardons for individuals involved in any aspect of January 6th or the planning for January 6th.”
pardons like the ones Bannon, Flynn and others got?
“When you were asked during a Rules Comm. hearing on Oct. 20, 2021, whether you’d be willing to share with the Select Comm. the info you have re: Jan. 6th & the events leading up..you responded, ‘I’ve said all along, ‘I have nothing to hide.’ I’ve been straightforward all along.’
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
👀🧵 “Rubio was scheduled to attend peace talks with Ukrainian officials in Switzerland, but Witkoff had set off early in what some officials saw as a bid to beat him to the punch…, Witkoff did not communicate his travel plans to Rubio & other State Dep. officials, the 3 sources said, in what they perceived as a move to allow Witkoff to negotiate with Ukraine in a way he saw fit.
“It was not the first time U.S. officials had seen Witkoff’s actions as an attempt to make an end-run around Rubio. …latest example of a long-running rift between the two senior figures…with sharply different views about how to end the war in Ukraine and how much the U.S. should trust Russia’s promises.”
“Late last month, days after the Geneva talks, Witkoff arranged a meeting with Ukrainian officials in Florida. Rubio became aware of the planned session only when the Ukrainians asked his team about it, according to a U.S. official and a person familiar with the incident.”
US official on talks with Ukraine says US willing to submit security package for Senate ratification.
Another US official says they have beefed up the security guarantees package but warns the guarantees will not be on the table forever. eg pressure on Ukraine to take it sooner
Second US official: “…details on security guarantees we are not ready to provide yet. They will come out soon. Think you will find everyone is happy with them.”
“As the negotiations over the chip exports continued, some WH officials noticed that Sacks had an ally in Witkoff, who was seen as a valuable supporter for the U.A.E., because he had Mr. Trump’s ear…
The Emiratis floated an even bigger request.
“US special envoy Steve Witkoff misunderstood Putin's statements & took them for a concession. .. 1/ unn.ua/en/news/trumps…
“He interpreted Russia's required ‘peaceful withdrawal’ of Ukrainians from Kherson & Zaporizhzhia as an offer of a ‘peaceful withdrawal’ of Russians from these same regions, reported BILD. 2/
“‘Witkoff doesn't know what he's talking about,’ a Ukrainian official stated. According to the publication, representatives of the German government share this assessment.”
🧵Iran Dep FM Ravanchi to NBC: “As long as there is no act of aggression being perpetrated by the United States against us, we will not respond again,” Takht-Ravanchi said when asked if more was to come.
“We are for diplomacy” & “we are for dialogue,” Ravanchi. But the US gov’t needs “to convince us that they are not going to use military force while we are negotiating. That is an essential element for our leadership to be in a position to decide about the future round of talks.”
“Our policy has not changed on enrichment,” Ravanchi said. “Iran has every right to do enrichment within its territory. The only thing that we have to observe is not to go for militarization.”
🧵Reporter: Mr. President, what's your reaction to the intelligence reports saying that the Iranian nuclear sites were only partially devastated, not entirely?
Trump: Well, …the report said it could have been very, they don't know.
Trump: I mean, if they did a report, I could have Pete [Hegseth] talk to it, because his department did the report. They really don't know.
I think Israel is going to be telling us very soon, because Bibi is going to have people involved in that whole situation.
Trump: We hear it was obliteration. It was a virtual obliteration.
When you take a look at the ground above, don't forget, the flame is all underground.