In BIG news for #PersonalJurisdictionTwitter, the Pennsylvania Supreme Court UNANIMOUSLY holds that consent by registration under Pennsylvania's long-arm statute violates the Due Process Clause. /1

#AppellateTwitter Image
With the Philadelphia Court of Common Pleas a popular plaintiff destination, many thought that the PA Supreme Court would uphold consent by registration. And PA's statute was unusually clear that it imposed general jurisdiction as a consequence of registering. /2
This was the big case we consent-by-registration people were watching and it is pretty amazing it came out in favor of the defense.

This leaves Georgia standing alone in the post-Daimler appellate world. And Cooper Tire has sought certiorari of that decision. /Fin
P.S. Thanks to @masslon for the pointer.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Sean Marotta

Sean Marotta Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @smmarotta

15 Nov
Here it is! The big Multicircuit Lottery step-by-step thread for what will happen tomorrow! For all of those on the edge of your seat/prewriting articles!

#AppellateTwitter
1. OSHA will e-file what is called a "Notice of Multicircuit Petitions for Review" with the JPML. It will include as appendicies a schedule of all lottery-compliant petitions (which may not be all petitions) and copies of each. It will be docketed as MCP 165.
2. OSHA will file copies of the Notice in all of the circuits where petitions for review are pending and on counsel for all parties to the petitions for review.
Read 13 tweets
10 Jun
Good question! It's different for every client that embeds appellate counsel, but I've done two for the same client and this is what I do. /1
Appellate counsel is attached when a case is set for trial and looks like it's actually going to go. My first order of business is to prepare motions in limine and argue them before trial. I also attend the pre-trial conference. /2
At trial, preservation is priorities 1-6. If I do nothing else, it's making sure we say "objection" when necessary to preserve the record. If the judge allows, I will argue sidebars. If not, I am whispering in examining counsel's ear. /3
Read 10 tweets
10 Nov 20
As outside counsel for @AHAhospitals, I will be live tweeting the #SCOTUS oral argument and providing analysis starting at 10 a.m. today. Opinions are mine. Read my earlier piece on their blog:
aha.org/news/blog/2020…. 1/
After the Chief Justice calls the case, we'll hear from Michael Mongan, the Solicitor General of California, who represents the coalition of States defending the ACA. He'll start with two minutes uninterrupted for an opening statement. 2/
Mongan's opening statement defends the constitutionality of the individual mandate with a $0 penalty, but also shifts to "severability" - whether the rest of the ACA can stand even if the mandate is unconstitutional. /3
Read 72 tweets
5 Jun 20
I talk about this question a lot when doing panels on social media. There are no good answers, but I think it's useful to tease apart a few different kinds of "sail trimming." /1
Some sail trimming is needed as either an ethical or good-partnership practice. For instance, when you work in a firm (esp. a big one), what you publish or say in your professional role is often constrained by who the firm represents, even if you don't know them. /2
I've had to spike or reel in views just because some other partner or partner's client justly would not want a fellow attorney from the firm that represents it saying X. You can quit, of course, but I'm talking about smaller issue commitments here. /3
Read 5 tweets
24 Nov 18
So here's a boring procedural take on these petitions while you enjoy your leftovers. /1
The government says that it needs certiorari before judgment because without it, review would not take place until October Term 2019. /2
But here's the thing: To secure review /this/ Term the petition will need to be fully briefed and submitted to the Court by mid-January. Currently, the briefs in oppositions are due on December 24, 2018. /3
Read 14 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(