How misinformation works:
- ONS report shows breakthrough infections in the vaccinated are more likely to be Omicron.
- HART's Will Jones writes a Daily Sceptic article falsely claiming "the vaccinated are playing an outsize role in the current outbreak".
- Toby Young: 2+2 = 541.
The ONS report *actually* says that if you're vaccinated you're LESS likely to catch covid.

But if you DO still catch covid, it's more likely to be Omicron. As you'd expect from a variant more able to evade immunity.

PS: The same's true for people who have had covid before.
The Daily Sceptic article admits this "doesn’t tell us how likely a person is to test positive in the first place".

But then falsely suggests that the Omicron outbreak is somehow the fault of the vaccinated! 🤨

Another HART attempt to "seed the thought vaccines cause covid"?
Unfortunately Daily Sceptic boss Toby Young doesn't seem to have got past the first paragraph of the article (which is wildly misleading) before tweeting about it.

Either his tweet is VERY poorly worded, or he actually thinks you're 4.5x more likely to catch Omicron overall. 🤦‍♂️

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Bye

John Bye Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @_johnbye

19 Dec
Another Sunday, another wildly misleading article and tweet from @thelucyjohnston, this time cherrypicking one sentence from a 31 page study by @collateralglbl to claim 40% of excess care home deaths weren't caused by covid. That figure is only for the first wave, and it's wrong.
The article does at least say this figure is only for March to June 2020. But it doesn't mention that many (possibly most) of those "non-covid" excess deaths are believed to have been undiagnosed covid, which in the elderly can look a lot like dementia.

We've long known covid deaths were under counted in the first wave. Concerns had already been raised in April 2020 that, in the absence of testing, care home death certificates weren't mentioning covid, even when it was suspected to be the cause of death.

Read 6 tweets
15 Dec
This paper by several HART members misses an obvious explanation for some odd looking ONS data, ignores the ONS' data definitions, then manipulates that data to falsely claim the vaccines cause a (non-existent) spike in deaths!

(Repost / update, as I broke the original thread)
The data oddity that caught their eyes is a bump in deaths per 100,000 in unvaccinated people in each age group, soon after that group starts being vaccinated.

But as the overall mortality rates show, there is NO spike in deaths during the vaccine rollout.

So what's going on?
The paper's authors wrongly believe the vaccines are killing us, so they present the data like this.

I replicated this graph from the raw ONS data, and it is correct. BUT it has an obvious explanation that doesn't involve claiming the ONS is deliberately miscategorising deaths!
Read 18 tweets
4 Dec
Anti-vaxxers have been going wild over this paper from several HART members. But it misses a blindingly obvious explanation for the odd looking ONS data, ignores the data definitions, then manipulates the data to falsely claim the vaccines cause a (non-existent) spike in deaths!
The data oddity that caught their eyes is a bump in deaths per 100,000 in unvaccinated people in each age group, soon after that group starts being vaccinated.

But as the overall mortality rates show, there is NO spike in deaths during the vaccine rollout.

So what's going on?
The paper's authors wrongly believe the vaccines are killing us, so they present the data like this.

I replicated this graph from the raw ONS data, and it is correct. BUT it has an obvious explanation that doesn't involve claiming the ONS is deliberately miscategorising deaths!
Read 15 tweets
28 Nov
New low for @hartgroup_org crank @TonyHinton2016, who is due to give a talk tomorrow to a group that's openly threatening violence and claims to be recruiting serving police officers and military personnel.
This group seems to be the brainchild of Ian Clayton, who's also associated with Ivermectin pushers BIRD.

He's threatened violent opposition to covid restrictions, and has a noose in his Twitter profile pic.

Hinton follows him, so must know what he's getting himself into.
UK Citizen say they want to bring down the judiciary and "predict a grim future" for politicians.

They retweet messages implying officials should be hanged, and conspiracy theories about the government building prisons with crematoria as concentration camps for the unvaccinated.
Read 4 tweets
20 Nov
The Strange Case of Dr Renee and Mrs Hoenderkamp... ImageImage
ImageImage
ImageImage
Read 9 tweets
28 Oct
A number of politicians, including the CRG and senior backbenchers like @SirGrahamBrady, have been working with anti-vax group HART.

One member of the House of Lords even joined the group, and offered them media training to help them get their message across!
At the beginning, HART's strategy (set by founder Narice Bernard and political fixer Bernie de Haldevang) was to work as a "scientific partner" to the Conservative backbench 1922 Committee and Covid Recovery Group, providing them with evidence to use to sway government policy.
Andrew Rosindell (Con, Romford) provided an early opening in mid January, before HART officially launched.

Bernie claimed to be "quite pally" with Rosindell, who was "completely on side".

He then uses Rosindell as a gateway to Liam Fox and the CRG's Mark Harper and Steve Baker.
Read 23 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(