One month ago, I wrote a first thread on #omicron (before it was called that) and I said we needed patience and we would learn a lot more.
So where are we today?
A quick #omicron thread before I sign off for a few days:
WHAT WE HAVE LEARNED:
A lot of the early fears have been borne out.
The virus is spreading in many countries just as it did in SAfrica.
It clearly has a huge growth advantage over Delta.
It is a lot better at infecting vaccinated and recovered individuals than previous variants.
BUT:
As the virus has spread, we have seen some hopeful signs as well.
We have seen fewer hospitalisations so far than in previous waves.
We have seen a faster than expected turnaround in South Africa.
We have early data suggesting the virus *might* be inherently milder.
WHAT WE HAVE YET TO LEARN:
It is still unclear how much of the lower number of severe cases in this wave is down to the virus itself having changed to cause milder disease and how much is down to it being able to infect people protected from severe disease.
(If you take the Imperial College report, you can see that a lot depends on your assumptions about how many of the infected people now had prior infections.
If a lot of the mild infections are actually in recovered people then it is more about immunity and less about the virus. )
Given data so far and first indications of plausible mechanisms from lab experiments, I would say that both factors probably play a role.
But as UK's latest threat assessment says: "We cannot confidently quantify the relative contributions of these 2 factors at present.”
Why is it important?
Because it will partly decide how #omicron plays out in countries with lower population immunity than South Africa or UK.
The other important and interesting question raised by the South African wave and some of the early lab data is about generation time:
Do cases in an infection chain follow one another faster than they did with previous variants?
That is important because the overall size of a wave really depends on the transmissibility of the virus. The generation time mostly decides how fast these cases accrue.
So a shorter generation time could lead to a shorter, narrower wave, as seen in South Africa.
As the latest #omicron assessment from @WHO notes:
“At the tie [sic] of writing, estimates of generation times for Omicron are still needed to better understand the observed dynamics.”
@WHO WHAT DOES IT ALL MEAN?
Omicron clearly has the potential to cause a lot of disease in a short time.
That will add to the burden of healthcare systems already strained (for instance in Germany), both with severe cases needing treatment and mild cases leading to staff shortage.
@WHO How it will play out in different countries will depend a lot on the answers to the open questions I outlined (and others, like how omicron affects children, the risk of long covid, etc.)
So message is still:
The next few weeks will be dangerous and difficult.
@WHO But overall, things could have looked bleaker at this point.
(There have been other good news: paxlovid, Novavax)
The biggest threat to all our health and wellbeing is still our utter failure at making the tools to fight #covid19 available to the most vulnerable everywhere.
@WHO I was hoping the world would be in a different situation as 2021 ends, but we are where we are.
It’s worth reflecting on how/why we have not used #covid19 vaccines to their full potential this year. I tried to do that in this piece: science.org/content/articl…
Interesting early data on #omicron severity in this preprint from SAfrica.
Main take-away for me still:
Population with high protection from severe disease but low protection from infection means more infections with mild symptoms.
Inherently milder? 🤷♂️
The authors compared SGTF cases with non-SGTF cases during the same time period (1/10 - 30/11).
Remember: SGTF is S gene target failure, the signal in certain PCR tests that is currently used as an (imperfect) proxy for omicron infections.
The authors found that the risk of these likely #omicron cases to end up in hospital was only about one fifth the risk (10-30%) of cases without SGTF (likely not omicron)
But once patients were in hospital, their risk of severe disease was about the same.
"We are clearly in a new and troubling phase of this pandemic. What we have seen so far is sobering but there is still much to learn about Omicron. We cannot afford to cross our fingers and hope this crisis blows over”, @JeremyFarrar writes in a statement just out.
@JeremyFarrar If transmission isn’t slowed, "we could see profound impacts on health systems but also across sectors such as education, hospitality, public transport, police and essential national infrastructure as infections prevent people from working.".
@JeremyFarrar It's "staggering and deeply frustrating that two years into this pandemic – when we have gathered so much evidence and made huge scientific progress – that governments are still not anticipating events and acting early or working together anywhere near the scale that is required"
Gemany’s @rki_de (basically our CDC) just put outs its recommendations for measures to curb #omicron.
Background: Number of delta infections and hospitalisations are declining, but #omicron cases are currently doubling about every 3 days and ICUs still very full.
@rki_de They recommend immediately:
- continuous masking indoors (and outdoors if <1,5 m distance), incl. for vaccinated people and in schools
- closing all bars, clubs, restaurants (except for takeaway), indoor sports
- cancelling large events
@rki_de - 2G+ for cultural events etc (so vaccinated or recovered, and test needed)
- 2G in most shops (only vaccinated or recovered allowed)
- 3G in supermarkets etc (so test needed for those not vaccinated or recovered)
- no singing indoors (for instance in church)
You must all be tired of this, but really:
There is still a lot of uncertainty about omicron’s characteristics, especially its severity.
Yes, there are more and more pieces of the puzzle, but they don’t fit together all that well and there are a LOT of questions and hypotheses.
You can look at the current data and come up with a lot of theories - and the less you know the easier it is for that theory to fit what you know.
But some of the smartest people I know have told me they are simply not sure what to think yet.
Just one example:
I talked to @trvrb briefly yesterday (for a story to come later) and asked about data from South Africa on severity vs. early reports in Europe. He said: “I don’t know how to square these two things and that is probably giving me the most pause at the moment.”
Germany’s new expert council weighs in on #omicron:
"Due to the simultaneous, extreme number of patients, a considerable overload of the hospitals is to be expected - even in the unlikely case of significantly weakened disease severity compared to the Delta variant"
They call for:
- further measures to reduce contacts
- enforcing current measures
- intensifying vaccination and booster campaigns
"all models show that booster vaccinations alone do not adequately contain the omicron wave, but that additional contact restrictions are necessary"
Beyond political decisions, "the population must be called upon to actively control infections. This includes avoiding larger gatherings, the consistent, preferred wearing of FFP2 masks, especially indoors, as well as the increased use of rapid tests at gatherings…"
Going by what we know so far, places like Germany or the US are in for a world of trouble in the coming weeks.
So I want to make a few general points here once that go beyond the science (will do the rest later):
Firstly, why are we in trouble?
Forget everything else for a moment and just look at the growth rate of #omicron in places like Denmark and Norway. Look at London. This virus is moving fast. It spreads fast. And it will find those most vulnerable fast.
Unfortunately, places like Germany and the US still have a lot of vulnerable people who are unvaccinated.
This variant will find those people fast and if it is anything like previous variants it will make a significant portion of these people very, very sick.