Will probably regret this thred later, but mainly I tweet about things I am thinking about. I am sincerely grateful for all of my Substack readers, and yet the phenomenon of angry unsubscribers has since November become a source of amusement to me.
There are first of all those I am least patient with, namely the lot who accuse me of being a grifter. I don’t know what to say here: It takes a lot of time and effort to write these pieces, and most are free anyway.
Then there are the lot who say I write too much. That was mainly in November, when I had a lot of momentum and I resolved to poast nearly every day, and with a few early mornings/ late nights almost managed it.
In December I couldn’t quite poast as much, and got the opposite angry unsubscriber complaint: “Your content is really trailing off.” Lol OK. For my pieces on bureaucracy and conspiracy, I got angry unsubscribers claiming I was running cover for Bill Gates.
My piece on Paddock yielded me unsubscribers accusing me of being too alt-right.
The moral of the story, is that beyond a certain audience size, almost anything you do yields a few loud unsatisfied readers.
It’s just amusing how diametrically opposed to one another all the complaints turn out to be.
Anyway, another thanks to all my readers, even the grumpy ones. It’s an incredible privilege to have a platform like this, I strive every day to be worthy of it.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Liberal democracy has given us pointless wind turbines on every horizon, mass immigration, the World Economic Forum, femael suffrage, Corona lockdowns, and the EU. Herewith, a thread on why liberal democracy is so bad.
Political power has a will of its own. It wants a single locus. Liberal democracy is premised on the idea that you can divide power among the people, place it in different regime silos (the judiciary, the parliament), and keep it fragmented.
In practice this just means that power in liberal democratic systems accrues over time to suboptimal, dysfunctional, illegible, unknown organisations and systems - the bureaucratic institutions.
Bad metaphor. A better one: in an effort to stop all football fouls, players are screened prior to matches for biomarkers predictive of red cards, and preemptively excluded on that basis. The system excludes so many players, matches become mostly impossible. …
Those few that still go ahead see just as many red cards as before. Defenders of the system respond to their failure by asserting that there would be *even more* red cards without their dumb screening system.
Then they switch tactics and say players can be exempt from screening if they just take foul-preventing injections prior to matches. These injure an unknown number of players but also don’t have any measurable effect on fouls.
1) Critical (& investigative) journalism is dead. Everything put out by major broadcast & print media is low-effort narcicissm poasting masterminded by uni interns & racially/ sexually obsessed lunatics. Stop being mad about this. It is opportunity.
2) Longer form journalism is a field almost entirely open to us. There is no competition, people want to know what is happening, they want to have comment sections where they can discuss this insanity, and their heretofore trusted newspapers feed them nothing but agitprop garbage
3) I think Substack is interesting platform we should explore & consider colonising. The email subscriber lists make our accounts resilient to banning. Look at successful Substack authors: Many of them are writing precisely in areas ignored or sidelined by our broken press.
Since nationwide house arrests were introduced, we've seen pervasive manipulation of scientific & media information, to create support for & encourage compliance with containment. This has in turn corrupted and hystericised the information available even to policymakers.
The people steering containment very obviously have only the most tenuous understanding of what is happening and what their policies can achieve, since they have repurposed most of their information sources to churn out constant streams of panic propaganda.
This is by the way one of the most important reasons, why technocratic fantasies of ScIENcE or FaCT BaSEd PoliCIeS are stupid. Scientific inquiry is, always will be, subordinate to political power. As soon as you set about trying to base something on ScIENcE ...
Comparing to the week 49 report, we see that the 30-49 year-olds are also falling deeper into negative efficacy, while things are improving for 60 year-olds, as they continue to boost.
While the booster campaign was still ongoing, we saw that vaccinated people in their 80s had about the same risk of death as that of unvaccinated people in their 70s. The boosters have improved things for them a little bit.