Somethings I’ve already noted (it’s a large volume of course. Typical.)
From session 9. 18 june 1923, afternoon
Centralism – Report and Discussion
Index
From glossary.
The focus on fascism is striking from a ‘21 perspective. From the editor’s intro…
(Note end of Harding’s presidency- successor of Wilson, is not even two months later. Just noting.)
This final report is referenced in intro above.
The response to what they call a coup in Bulgaria leads next to its resolution on Fascism. But the resolution’s persuasion is…see for yourself.
Remember. These are the victors. White movement is anti communist but specifically anti Bolshevik. (Whiteness. white supremacy. It’s so obvious when you remember or read their writings. How do we not teach this to this day? Especially now?) @ConceptualJames@NickHudsonCT
Remember the peasant class across the “blood lands?” Beginning in Ukraine then continuing on after *Yalta*? 1923 continues…
On religion. Note the utilization of religion in one direction. Is it antisemitic to point to similarities to beginnings of the holocaust? Or…@ConceptualJames I think this is important.
And “fascism”…just read the whole thing.
White = fascist = white supremacy = whiteness = revolution = dictatorship of the proletariat = civil war = “revolution” then repeat. Forever.
There is no utopia.
*trade* unions “question”
“Cooperative” question
Finally they plan for 1924 which meets in June rather than March and Germany received the flag and symbol that is visible everywhere. timesofisrael.com/the-1924-trial…
So this is a massive document with only a little featured here. And wow. Again. How do we not teach this? 1922 avalon.law.yale.edu/20th_century/r…
🧵THREAD: What Really Happened in World War I The Great War
Not the story you were taught. A tale of broken empires, ritual inversion, and the memory war that never ended.
🕯️ On this day, August 3rd, Germany declared war on France. But the real story started long before…and it’s still unfolding.
1. The End of a Sacred Order
World War I was not just a geopolitical accident.
It was a ritual dismemberment of the old world monarchies, lineages, and sacred patterns of time and memory.
Czar Nicholas. Emperor Franz Joseph. Kaiser Wilhelm.
All related. All gone by war’s end.
This was not chance.
2. A War Against the West
What collapsed in 1914 wasn’t just empires.
It was faith itself—the covenant between the individual, the sacred, and the real.
It wasn’t only Christendom that fell,
but the very promise of religion:
That life had meaning.
That suffering had dignity.
That the soul stood before God - not the State.
THREAD 🧵 | Why some media outlets may shut down instead of reporting the truth: The hidden history behind the Smith-Mundt Act, intelligence-media networks, and the rise of the information-industrial complex (2012 to 2025) - a study.
1. They call it the Great Narrative. We call it what it is: weaponized consensus built by midwit technocrats, intel cutouts, and corporate priests.
You’re not watching collapse.
You’re watching controlled reconstruction through chaos.
Let’s name it all.
Let’s ✨Zachor what we learned from Covid.
2. It started in 2012. Quietly.
Congress passed the Smith-Mundt Modernization Act, buried in the NDAA. It repealed a Cold War rule that banned the U.S. government from deploying propaganda against its own citizens.
The firewall came down. The machine turned inward.
1. In Oct 1944, Stalin and Hitler helped a fringe paramilitary party — the Arrow Cross — seize power in Hungary in 1944 - A Catholic priest, András Kun, used religion to justify mass executions.
2. The Arrow Cross Party began in the 1930s as a minor extremist movement in Hungary.
They called themselves “Green Shirts”, copying the uniform tactics of militant groups in Europe.
The color “green” was meant to signal renewal, nationalism, and peasant identity as a branding move to appeal to “the people.”
Something changed in us after the lockdowns. Not just mentally. Not just emotionally. Deeply. Spiritually. Here’s what I’m seeing—and why we may be living through the long echo of mass psychological programming. 🧵
1/ After the mandates, lockdowns, and messaging loops, I’ve been watching people. And what worries me most isn’t fear.
It’s this:
People no longer seem moved to act just because something is good.
Only if it is “effective,” “impactful,” or “productive.” This inverts Hope.
2/ Rather than Hope being relational and personal it’s mechanized, institutionalized, made into something determined by a system. Vaclav Havel said this about Hope.
What the Talmud really says—and why misunderstanding satire leads to dangerous distortion.
Let’s talk about Peter Schäfer, “Yeshu,” and why misreading rabbinic humor is like thinking A Modest Proposal advocated cannibalism. 🧵
1/ @RealCandaceO here cites Princeton scholar Peter Schäfer to claim the Talmud says disgraceful things about Jesus.
That’s not just incorrect—it’s a misreading of satire, of literary context, and of Jewish interpretive tradition. Remember what Robin Williams said about killing all the funny people?
@RealCandaceO 2/
In Jesus in the Talmud, Schäfer analyzes stories about “Yeshu” (a figure some associate with Jesus) in rabbinic texts written centuries after his death.
These stories are not creeds…they’re literary, often satirical, and encoded for a reason.