There's an article to be written explaining how and why so many people who began with "anti-woke" as their defining identity ended up as "anti-vax."
But who should write it?
Even weirder
Some who started on the anti-anti-Trump right; others on the anti-HIllary left - none with any particular interest in the vaccine issue one way or the other - but who are now drifting toward anti-vax crackpot ideology only because they hate liberals so much.
Likewise, there's no apparently necessary reason that ex-leftists who pooh-poohed Trump's Russian connections should drift toward championing ivermectin and mocking Dr Fauci - and yet it keeps happening. Why, why, why?
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
But it still seems a crazy trade-off. "Yes, we have smashed up our most important economic relationships, imposed huge new barriers to trade, burdened our future growth prospects - but on the bright side, we might get an even number of servings in our champagne bottles ..."
America's top anti-vax, pro-Putin TV host incited his audience against me last night, I see from the morning load of hate mail. Just remember everybody: the Fox hosts are all vaccinated themselves. It's only their audiences that they are urging toward illness and death.
Many mocked Dennis Prager for intentionally seeking COVID infection to acquire "natural immunity" (if he survived). thedailybeast.com/dennis-prager-…
But at least Prager led from the front. Led stupidly, yes, but not dishonestly. Almost everybody else encouraging anti-vax resistance on TV, Facebook, Rumble, etc.? Vaccinated all, to protect themselves and their families from the dangers they urge upon their followers.
The great British PM, the Marquess of Salisbury, warned: "If you believe the doctors, nothing is wholesome; if you believe the theologians, nothing is innocent; if you believe the military, nothing is safe." At some point, it's the job of politicians to decide: we're safe enough
Unless the US moves to vastly stricter vaccine mandates - which I would favor, but which is plainly not going to happen - the US will stall at present vaccination levels. 1/x
@HotlineJosh So the practical political choice is: keep schools and businesses on the present hobbled footing indefinitely - or return fully to normally as boosters become available to all, accepting the inherent risks of "normal" in a 30% unvaxxed society? 2/x
@TheAtlantic China generates 65% of its electricity by burning coal. India's electricity comes 73% from coal. And those are moving targets as electrical output rises. There's no way renewables can come online fast enough to catch up. Only nuclear can do that.
@TheAtlantic Here's China's electricity production since 1986. How do you decarbonize this surging output without a massively productive power source like nuclear? ceicdata.com/en/indicator/c…
On this anniversary of Pearl Harbor, an anecdote from Max Hastings' "Overlord":
Before DDay, a US officer briefed a roomful of Poles on modern war tactics. The Poles, veterans of 5 years of combat, listened dutifully. 1/x
Afterward, a Pole with a healed gash across his face, approached the American lecturer. “You omitted the most important lesson of all."
“What’s that?” asked the American.
The Pole replied: “Be the stronger one.”
2/x
Until this date, 80 years ago, there was uncertainty about how the Second World War would end. After this date, it was only a question of when - and how much suffering until the inevitable arrived. 3/x
Congressional subpoena power was agreed in the first Congress by a committee led by James Madison that also included constitutional signatory Roger Sherman