A group claims that Allah's actions are Muhdath [Originated] yet not created. They have opened the door to Kalami arguments.
Why do they say this?
1) Because it happens when Allah wants it to happen, for example, Allah spoke to Musa a.s. in the past, not in the present.
They use the above example as proof, that Allah's actions of speaking with Musa, isn't eternal, rather it originated at that moment when of event.
2) Here is the error in this claim - If it happened at that time and it could not happen in eternity, does this mean Allah's action is bound by that time?
If the answer is yes, then this means, Allah is affected by the creation.
Why? Because he in fact has to give the honor to the creation to carry out the action at that moment.
This is where Imam Tahawi refutes this entire claim.
Does Allah not have unlimited attributes? An example,
A glass of water, contains unlimited water, will this water when I drink it ever be affected [in the meaning of amount]?
No.
Allah is independent of His creation, and His creation is dependant upon Him. He is pre-eternal, with His attributes, Essence, and actions.
So when a person asks, did Allah not *create* Ahmed 5 years ago? Did Allah not provide for me today?
What is bound by time, is the result of that action, but the action of providing itself is pre-eternal. We came to know about provision only today. The same way, when Allah created time, did he create it in the past? If yes, was time always existing with him?
The last point to mention is about being free of His creation.
When a person writes a book, he requires, a pen, paper, will, and ability. He relies on other things to make something to reality.
Does Allah need to rely on time for his actions to be or are they eternal? Rather the effect comes into place in time but the actions are carried out eternally.
وقال العلامة السفاريني:
فسائر الصفات والأفعال قديمة الله ذي الجلال
/end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
The reality of Allah's hearing and seeing and how they differ from what we know [Part 2]
[A 🧵]
Today we carry on about unveiling the reality of the understanding, about the the hearing and seeing of Allah according to the Maturidiyah.
We will start with Imām Al-Maghnīsāwī and his explanation of Al-Fiqh Al-Akbar:
„And he sees, not like our seeing – because we see shapes/forms and colours with organs and restrictions, Allah sees shapes/forms and colours with His seeing, that is His attribute in eternity, not
„Actions are other than the belief, and the belief js other than actions, the evidence for this is at many times an action is uplifted from a believer, and it is not allowed to say, 'Iman was uplifted from Him.'
So an example would be, Allah ﷻ has lifted the prayer from her (the woman on menstruation), but it I not allowed to say, 'Iman was lifted from her and [she] was commanded with leaving Iman.
Recently, I was listening to a discussion about the issue of Kalamullah where one Salafi brother threw in the claim that the actions of Allah are Muhdath in support of his claim that the Qur'an is Muhdath, and something Muhdath can be applied to Allah.
Oftently, when we see the Mutakallimeen and opposite cross paths, they roll over each other due to their terminological differences.
The reason for this question is, due to the following point:
ربيت هذا الولد بيدي
I raised this child with my hands.
NOTE: This is not to discuss any specific Sifah of Allah, moreover is it about the Murad what one person makes.
In the above example, we know what Yadayy means and we know I am talking about hands > which are body parts (but this is not the point). However, what is my Murad when I make this statement?
My Murad with this is, that I raised this kid personally myself.
Pleaseeeeee I beg you to read my threads more carefully. Where did I say we don't understand anything from this? I even stated it is less Mutashabih than the others. I gave you that which we understand for ourselves in this.
As you like to call it, the رسم understanding of the Sifāt. Affirming the attributes of السمع and البصر is not related to which meaning we are affirming, but we all unanimously agree with the رسم I have stated.
I'm guessing you are blocked but I am adding this in anyways for people to see.