1] There's a need to balance embracing ex political opponents & creating strategic allegiances founded on trust.
Politics is no child's play, neither is defeating an entrenched military dictatorship.
Any serious politician would do so, constantly checking their shoulder.
2] The same political leaders you're forcing to embrace some of these unrepentant characters like true Statesmen, will have difficult questions to answer, when you flip scripts, abusing the benefit of hindsight.
A simple case in point is the unfolding drama of Jabulani Sibanda.
3] Adv Chamisa once spoke of infiltration challenges which historically troubled the MDC.
He mentioned how ZanuPF would know some of their plans before their internal strategic meetings even ended.
Looking back now at the behaviour of these MDC-T people, you see whats at play.
4] ZanuPF might be clueless when it comes to governance, but give them credit when it comes to running effective intelligence.
They even 'hound out' some of their own, & set traps for the ever welcoming Opposition who do so much damage before eventually 'going back home'.
5] Allegiances should be founded on trust & a common agenda.
Forcing alliances with people who have a diff agenda may not be worth the risk, because you might become a hindrance to them.
Don't force yourself to trust people with a well documented history of being untrustworthy.
6] While we tweet here on social media, politics equally involves having sensitive strategic meetings outside the glare of SM.
Don't burden your leaders with having such engagements with these hypocritical characters least we willingly prolong the change agenda.
Trust is key!
7] Of equal importance, is avoiding leaving loyal supporters disillusioned by needlessly trying to woe characters with a checkered history.
How do you ask people not to be emotional. Are human capable of such?
Some of these people bring back a lot of memories, all of them BAD.
8] Leaders should attract respect even when you disagree with them.
On the basis of their history of violence, how can some aggrieved citizens ever embrace the current Leadership in Harare?
The same question arises with regards to some characters angling towards replacing them?
9] Why should you burden citizens by recycling failed 'leaders' & forcing them on us?
Will the democratic alternative fail to attract new "thinkers & political scientists" without a bad history?
Surely there can arise a new generation of patriots who can fix our man made mess!
10] Ofcourse I won't try to paint everyone with a single brush
After all, I'm not God, & won't play gatekeeper against those seeking a new path
I however ask, like in 2017, is there wisdom in consuming medicine which leaves side effects worse than what its 'curing'?
enkosi!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2] Let's start perhaps with what the long thread ignored
Over the past few days, even if one ignored the genesis of this 'twar', Prof JN & his peers have been throwing all sorts of vitro & character assignation against WaMagaisa's person.
Prof decided to ignore this completely.
3] Prof's thread equally ignores that actual issues raises in response to his 'advice'.
Some felt he disqualified himself from having an opinion on how the funds are to be used by blueticking the initiative.
Others queried the legality of diverting funds raised through gofund.
1] When a whole Chief admits that he has had to swap jackets & vigorously campaign for his muzukuru, ED, & ZanuPF, then know he's part of the problem.
Chief simply need to maintain their identity as traditional leaders, and use that authority to lead their communities.
2] As long as Chiefs allow themselves to be entangled in partty politics, those actually occupying higher posts within those political institutions, will treat them as subordinates.
Chiwenga clearly spoke like he was reprimanding his party's self-proclaimed Provincial Commissar.
3] Individually & collectively, Chiefs needs to start conversations on how to reclaim their autonomy & identity.
They equally need not treat elected leaders as their equals, for their sources of authority are different.
How often have we heard DM & Komichi claim they campaigned vigorously for Nero?
Does it make sense, in relation to their admission that they were plotting against Nero, since the 2018 Nat Council Komichi chaired, which made him their candidate?
3] another hypothetical question:
How does a respondent "work tirelessly" for a Supreme Court judgement which they loose, whilst holding a prepared speech accepting and celebrating the judgement?
What was the role of Mwonzora,Komichi et al, in the court application, & outcome?
"Mtuli Ncube's budget was one of the most dishonest budgets ever presented. It was technically unsound & doesn't meet the test for credibility. This was a man just going through a ritualistic formality since Sec 302 of the Con demands he goes through the process"
"Mtuli Ncube presented a ZW $900 billion budget using an exchange rate of 1:105, the official exchange rather on the day he presented the budget, on the 27th of November 2021. It is a USD $8.7 billion budget. This economy can't collect USD $8.7 billion"
"you can't collect USD $8.7 billion in an economy where more than 90% of our people are unemployed; where more than 70% are in the informal sector; where according to the World Bank & other sources, 50%/70% of our people are living in extreme poverty"
1] Nothing screams incompetence, & exposes the leadership kwashioker in Harare, more than these PR stunts being pulled by ZanuPF, in their fight over the sanctions.
Outside these optics, this so called "UN Special Rapporteur" is just another European on holiday in Zimbabwe.
2] From the get-go, ZanuPF has never been interested in having an honest conversation over sanctions, with anyone.
After years of blaming Tsvangirai, they moved to Mugabe, now their it's all on Chamisa
How/Why then should ZanuPF be seen as being sincere?
3] But perhaps more concerning, or is it embarrassing, is how ZanuPF is prepared to talk to anyone, except the countries they blame for imposition of sanctions.
Its embarrassing how Mnangagwa enjoys hiding behind fatigued politicians & international crooks in his sanctions fight
2] The Judge reasons, rightfully so, that by the 2018 elections, there were two distinct PDPs.
In doing so, the Judge recognizes the right of association, by the Biti led PDP faction, to belong wherever, without being entangled in some supposed "one PDP" under any individual(s).
3] The judge makes another determination, on how frivolous it would be, for individuals who went to the 2018 election under "rainbow coalition", as did Matibenga & team, to now claim ownership over MPs elected under MDC-A.
He calls the imposter PDP Secretary & team, "cuckoos".