“Now we know that the vaccines work well enough that the virus STOPS with every vaccinated person.” - @maddow in late March of this year. (Source of this show is @NBCNews@MSNBC or whoever will try to get this shaming tweet down for “copyright.” It isn’t. I am giving due credit.)
“You are not gonna get COVID if you have these vaccinations.” - Biden in July.
(Source of this show is @CNN or whoever in that cooperation will try to get this shaming tweet down for “copyright.” It isn’t. I am giving due credit but real rules don’t matter around here.)
He wrote “100%” twice; once as in 100%!
The promise versus the outcome is why vaccines shouldn’t be mandated before being years in the filed with a full understanding of how things workout. Vaxx passes were made with the assumption of no spread.
Fauci in May on @FaceTheNation to @johndickerson: “When you are [C19] vaccinated… you become a dead end to the virus and when there are a lot of dead ends around the virus is not gonna go anywhere.”
Update: 70% populations are “dead-ends” yet cases are busting old records. How?
Many COVID policies still in place such as vaxx passed are rooted in the assumption that being COVID-19 vaccinated means a dead-end to spread. Despite it being more broadly acknowledged in recent weeks that this is not the case, the same policies remain.
Vaccine Fanatics.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2 million non-Jewish Arabs live in Israel, and Jews were "Palestinian" the same as non-Jews.
On the flip side, Palestinianism today is predicated on the notion that the area should be free of Jews; the same as in Nazi Germany.
Israel = Inclusivity.
Palestinianism = Nazism.
2/ It's not that Antisemites attach themselves to the "Palestinian" cause. The movement IS antisemitic because if Jews are Palestinian, then "Palestine will be free" from what? The Israel government? Um, if we call it Palestine, Jews will still be in the government. Then what?
3/ "Palestine" is a geographic area that had Jews, Muslims, Christians, so to use "Palestinians" as non-Jews only is Nazism.
This is worse than a white guy who wants NYC to be 91% white as it was in 1948. It's worse because Palestine in 1948 was +50% Jewish, then Arabs invaded.
1/ Why didn’t Obama & Dems make Juneteenth a federal holiday a decade ago?
Simple. The day came into focus only when Trump had planned to return campaigning on 6/19/20. Faix storm ensued.
To own Trump, a federal holiday was born.
I am not complaining; I am giving you history.
2/ Check the Twitter feed of many congressional and Senate Dems, TV heads, and leftists pundits. Most of them literally never sent a tweet about Juneteenth before it became an issue to own Trump in 2020; some only had a mention here and there in previous years.
3/ For example, in all her years on Twitter until 2020, @SpeakerPelosi’s account had tweeted only 4 times abut Juneteenth.
In 2020 alone she tweeted it 4 times; passed a House resolution about the day and got it signed a federal holiday in June '21 by Biden.
- There are no 250+ deaths from the rescue; sure not mostly civilians.
- There is no famine; 99.9% people are full-faced.
- It is not a "camp" of "refugees." It is a fully-developed neighborhood by people who never lived elsewhere.
It's a movement predicated on brazen lies!
Gaza claimed that 23,300 of its citizens died in the first 3 months of the war.
That's 260 deaths a day; 90 days in a row.
If true, the strike in Rafah 2 weeks ago; the strike on a "UN warehouse" last week; and deaths from the rescue would hardly be news.
It's a BS Machine.
No one sane refers to Hasidim in Williamsburg as refugees despite their grand parents having escaped from Europe and from Muslim-majority countries 70-80 years ago. Yet grandkids from Jordanians who worked 2 years for Jews in Haifa in the 1940's, are called refugees...
Can a POTUS retroactively revoke his political opponent's presidential privileges which paves the way for a raid on and prosecution of his opponent who is now seeking immunity from this POTUS?
The answer is yes. Biden did just that.
A Biden Judge asked the attorney of Biden's Political Opponet if a POTUS has the authority to take out his political opponent, and if the answer is no then it implies that Biden('s DOJ) can continue to try to take out his political opponent...
1984 wasn't this convoluted.
The Biden DOJ asked Trump for docs.
Trump claimed executive privilege (EP).
DOJ went to the WH for help.
Biden Deputized the National Archivist to revoke Trump's EP.
She did.
DOJ affidavit mentions violations of Archive laws (created by action above) as a reason to raid! 🚨