hello my friends. how you you. still half on half off for the holidays but i thought it would be cool to do a [RECAP] thread for what we got done this year, as we are gearing up for the craziest year at the studio yet (next year). lets do it. flashback. montage. roll the tape:
will probably just slowly continue this thread until the new year.
i think this was the first thing i dropped this year: the inverted soviet propaganda series. honestly this took forever, but im really happy with how it ultimately turned out. heres the thread:
the weird thing that happens when you have something cooking for months is that you always want more of a response, but people were really into it. i thought they turned out really well:
i had to order a lot of test prints to make sure they had this silkscreen propaganda look. that was cool. what i think i learned from this is something im trying to actualize next year which is documenting everything better, so its easier for people to link to and share stuff
like i kept seeing people sharing it around linking to the thread on twitter and i was like, man thats kind of unideal, i need a dedicated page for projects and stuff like that. part of the goal next year is to have a better hub + cataloging process
we will continue the montage when i am back at my desk
guess ill mention a few background things here as well. one cool thing about having a whole image situation going is that you accumulate little things and store them and then use them later. for example, i just pulled up this sketchbook page from august of 2020:
(from my patreon, where I post such things, little plug). you can see the tulip / rose / lily seal there twice at the bottom. i had this idea because tulips to me are kind of the gene and genetics flower, I was thinking about Christ's lineage, the rose representing his passion ..
the lily as a symbol of mary, and it kind of fit together nicely in this seal, but i didn't do anything with it.
then way later, as i was finishing up these posters, i realized i needed a little logo or seal to put on them to give them that official company state propaganda look
so i ended up using it for exactly that. thats part of why i call it the lab, it really is like u have a bunch of experiments going on and you pull things from one to other, etc
small note, in the second image you can see i accidentally first sent it out saying "ethnically". lol
there were a few other ones i roughly mocked up to think about, i may return to this theme at some point. here you can see one. didnt plan on this being a patreon thread but this is the kind of thing i post there, when im working on projects, sketching things out, every week.
next up: i think this was the next big project I dropped this year. this american cryptid print. this one took forever to make happen. heres the thread:
this one took forever man. some of the files I have are from fall 2020, but i know i started it way earlier than that. actually i remember working on this in colorado so, yeah it took forever. i had to research each cryptid, decide which to include, then i hit a few obstacles.
one thing i realized running a creative operation is that if youre not doing something, its often because mentally you've hit a wall and havent realized it. so i sketched this one out, and then, i knew i was making it an analog print which really changes the color situation.
(last time ill mention it but since im posting images from patreon, just so u know, if ur on there, i only release images publicly from the private feed after a really long time, rarely, so, anything i post from there is from at least over a year ago, maybe a little less).
because when i do a physical print, i usually want it to read like it was made via an analog (i.e. non digital) print method. so i guess at first i was thinking silkscreen and, i was in the mountains, it was fall, and i got really into this red and grey vibe:
but it just wasn't happening man. i kept scrapping all the color, then coming back to it, then starting over, and at first id limit myself to one or two colors, then go full color, it just wasnt working, so i put it away from a few months.
btw here are some of the sketches. maybe the second image is why i thought the spot coloring / only patches of red thing was the way to go. but then, am i letting the paper show through? i couldn't tell and got kind of stuck. you can also notice the first one is labeled.
⏸
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
if u dont know already, if u see a footnote or background historical note for something unless u actually go check + prove to urself that its real you should not believe it. once i started following footnotes and looking into it people literally just make things up all the time.
before the internet + searchable texts, i mean they probably still do it now, people apparently just made up church father quotes and stuff quite often. most times i have attempted to source a strange augustine quote for example the only thing that comes up is the book im reading
i have often wondered the concrete mechanism at play here like, if some guy 200 pages into a book before control+F searchable type existed just said “eh no ones actually going to check this” and started winging it, or if many fake quotes and documents were circulating, or what.
theres some fascinating inverse correlation for how the pop caricature of liberals and conservatives relate to individuals vs groups that i can almost articulate but cant. ie liberals are supposed to be worried about “offending” but this only applies to groups of people. [...]
in practice whenever im around them they invariably assume aspects of your own worldview are actually extremely offensive without even pausing for a second to consider it. likewise the pop caricature about conservatives is that they dont care about helping others. [...]
but to whatever extent this is true, this also only relates to groups and likewise has an inverse correlation with their relationship to individuals. if i had a flat tire i could probably wait on the side of the road where im from (liberal) for days and no one would stop to help.
one of my favorite closed loop / back door thought implications that is never discussed is that telling someone they dont have the credentials to fully understand or analyze something cuts both ways. its used to dismiss doubt but it also consequently dismisses certainty.
said more simply, if someone doesnt have the background knowledge or degree or credentials to question something, that also means they dont have the means to accept it - intelligently anyway. “you’re not equipped to analyze this” goes way farther than the way its normally used.
ie if im questioning something about the geological record, and i say, does this really make sense? and someone says, well, youre not a geologist, what do you know- thats actually an admission that you’re asking me to take what you perceive to be true on faith, to just believe it
now that the first day of christmas is over i feel pretty good weighing in on the “what do you tell your kids about santa” situation. im going to tell owen jr “i dont know” and use it as a learning experience for figuring out something society wide and mythological for yourself.
a big part of our theory of children here comes from steiner, so, on one hand the magic of childhood thing and kids living in a somewhat imaginary world and experiencing things on those terms is relatively central, yet i also am not comfortable “straight up lying”, to be harsh.
therefore i am extremely confident in this approach. told my wife to do whatever she wants. for the record i used to work around kids and this was the approach i took if they asked about certain ancient stories or mythology, in certain situations, if it was prudent to do that.
new age never really went away it just became the default spiritual system. explicitly identifying with crystals and people channeling entities from the pleiades then leading seminars in holiday inn conference rooms just became tacky but its the same continuum and heritage
when that tony robins doc came out a while ago i almost wrote something about it because at his seminars, he uses the term God sometimes. this is actually very interesting because no one would describe it as religious, but it fits and works because of the larger spiritual system
- pathologizes everyone (everyone needs it)
- no null hypothesis (it never [doesnt work], you just need a different one or didnt do something correctly)
- personal eternal eschatological endpoint that relieves any further responsibility (yes, im working on it, im in therapy)
if everyone needs to be in therapy (not saying no one needs it), then that means that every single person simply by virtue of existing requires a institutional + accredited trained merit badge holding experts just to function
thats why. if thats true then that changes everything
in that way its obviously a type of parallel priesthood. i mean its basically confession right, ur just confessing to someone with a degree or special training instead of someone you view as an officer of God