Out of the climate scientists on here, my voice is one of the most desperate and the most like the scientists in #DontLookUp. I plead, I curse, I make myself vulnerable. I point steadfastly to the meteor. Ironically, this limits my access and exposure in the mainstream media.
I call for big changes to our social, economic, and human systems in response to climate and ecological breakdown. I see both political parties failing on climate. I see a need to rapidly change the status quo. But most people in the media don't want to platform these views.
This is why I felt seen when I watched the movie. I hope it signals a sea change in mainstream climate storytelling. We desperately lack climate stories, and this void is being filled by things like "carbon capture" and "we'll go to Mars" and "COP26 was a success." (it wasn't)
First come the stories. Then the big (truly big) grassroots movement. (So big it makes what we have now look tiny - a billion climate activists.) This unlocks meaningful policy and big systemic change. And then, a sense of solidarity and gratitude, and a new outlook for humanity
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
It's weird how climate breakdown has been such an untouched subject by our greatest artists - musicians, writers, filmmakers, visual artists... there has been some stuff, but given how literally Earth-shaking the subject is, weirdly little. We are still a society in denial.
This is why #DontLookUp was so powerful for me. I actually feel uncomfortable in new fictional worlds that pretend climate breakdown doesn't exist (movies, shows, books) because at this point in climate emergency they feel denial-y and irrelevant. And they help perpetuate denial
And then there are the disaster movies that are obviously inspired by climate anxiety, but that are frankly also perpetuate denial, probably because the artist is her or himself still in denial to some extent. A great example of this is the George Clooney film "The Midnight Sky."
No, @nytimes the planet isn't "failing." It is being actively destroyed, irreversibly, by the fossil fuel capitalists.
Also, @nytimes, you say that the solution is carbon capture. You are wrong. The solution, obviously, is to end the fossil fuel industry. Why can't you just say it?
To even think for a moment that THIS could save us when we now have roughly five years left before locking in 1.5°C at current emissions rates. Not even @nytimes editors grasp the depth of the emergency we are in. #EmergencyMode
This is a mind-blowing simulation from a team led by @RommieAmaro, and with stunning visualizations. Truly fascinating. Einstein would have loved to see it. nytimes.com/interactive/20…
There have been a few other times when I felt the awe of being "transported" into the world of the very small. A foray into scanning tunneling microscopy in a lab class, and research involving modeling molecular rotational transitions, both as an undergrad. 'k back to climate
I just want to add, what a truly bizarre species we are. That we can accomplish so much, but can't take obvious, and not even very hard steps collectively to safeguard the habitability of our planet.
Did you know that the rate of mean sea-level rise has roughly doubled since the 80s and 90s? Currently at about 4 mm per year. That may not sound like much, but it's 4 mm of inexorable ocean rise, every year, and it's accelerating rapidly.
Sea-level rise isn't even what keeps me up at night, though. That would be the coming extreme heat waves, crop failures, ecosystem death, and geopolitical instability! #EmergencyMode#EndFossilFuels
I don't see any way to sugar coat this, or that sugar coating it is in any way useful. But, here are some general guiding ideas on climate activism that may be helpful. Ultimately though, how you create change is up to you. It's a grand, joyful experiment.
All ads from fossil fuel corporations should now be illegal. Period.
Fossil fuel ads routinely misinform to promote neocide and the destruction of our planet for profit. The fact that they are not yet illegal, even as climate breaks down all around us, is evidence of how the industry has captured our legislative process and our media.
I wanted to clarify where we're at with global heating. You may see 1.1°C sometimes, and 1.2°C other times. 1.1°C is for the 2011-2020 (decadal) mean, and 1.2°C is about where we are right now.
Every 5 years this goes up about another 0.1°C.
Humanity emits more than 1,000 metric tons of CO2 each second, or over 40 billion tons per year, mainly from burning fossil fuels. The richest 1% emit more than twice what the bottom 50% of humans emit.
(part of why we can't keep supporting this ultra-rich ruling class anymore)
The IPCC estimates there are about 200 billion tons left to emit and still have a two-thirds chance to stay below 1.5°C. So that's 5 years from now. Just like the Bowie song. That's why this year is so incredibly important.