Keep Current with bitbutter

bitbutter Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @mormo_music

30 Dec
many otherwise smart seeming people claiming that the risk of harm from vaccination is very small.

no. we don't know what the risks are. because: 🧵
1. there's no rigorously collection of adverse events. only passive systems like VAERS. VAERS, known to be subject to massive underreporting, *is* seeing many times more reports than the increased rate of vaccination alone would predict. this is ignored by 'authorities' so far.
2. there is no routine testing for subclinical damage post vaccination. nor was there any biomarker testing for the possibility of such damage in the trials - for instance micro clots.
Read 6 tweets
21 Aug
is this an official FDA account?

one of the entities responsible for limiting access to ivm packaged for human consumption, driving people to take more risky animal formulations?

seriously, y'all. Stop it.
as far as I can tell, the risk, by the way has entirely to do with the user needing to precisely measure out a correct weight-adjusted dose themselves.
this, needless to say, is not medical advice. and neither is what the FDA is flippantly shitting out above.
Read 5 tweets
11 Aug
Can you take a look at this @EduEngineer?

thread: The Rounding the Earth substack contains the claim "Even worse, we know that vaccine deaths seem to be automatically classified as COVID-19 deaths". roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/how-underrep…
This claim is based on the following paper: researchgate.net/publication/35…
The paper examined 250 death reports. It says:
"all 250 people in this interim collection were reported as COVID-19 deaths. This means that all [...] are erroneously counted in the officially reported national COVID-19 death tally."
Read 8 tweets
7 Jul
as a layperson, under what circumstances might it be reasonable to be skeptical about the claims of a majority of experts on a subject?

when the incentive structure in that domain is broken
when the 'consensus view' is the product of social engineering; expert dissenters institutionally excluded for plausibly political reasons

when continued gov funding and/or career opportunity looks like it depends on having advanced the 'consensus view'
when you notice that counter-evidence is reflexively dismissed; institutional messaging pretends it doesn't exist. uncertainties not acknowledged.
Read 14 tweets
5 Jul
wait. the post-vaccination magnetism was real?
relatively low confidence in the veracity of this. but watching: orwell.city/2021/06/graphe…
"We have observed weak super paramagnetism and hysteresis in the samples of both GO (graphene oxide) and RGO due to presence of functionalized groups and other defects in the layered carbon structures.
sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(