many otherwise smart seeming people claiming that the risk of harm from vaccination is very small.
no. we don't know what the risks are. because: 🧵
1. there's no rigorously collection of adverse events. only passive systems like VAERS. VAERS, known to be subject to massive underreporting, *is* seeing many times more reports than the increased rate of vaccination alone would predict. this is ignored by 'authorities' so far.
2. there is no routine testing for subclinical damage post vaccination. nor was there any biomarker testing for the possibility of such damage in the trials - for instance micro clots.
as far as I can tell, the risk, by the way has entirely to do with the user needing to precisely measure out a correct weight-adjusted dose themselves.
this, needless to say, is not medical advice. and neither is what the FDA is flippantly shitting out above.
thread: The Rounding the Earth substack contains the claim "Even worse, we know that vaccine deaths seem to be automatically classified as COVID-19 deaths". roundingtheearth.substack.com/p/how-underrep…
The paper examined 250 death reports. It says:
"all 250 people in this interim collection were reported as COVID-19 deaths. This means that all [...] are erroneously counted in the officially reported national COVID-19 death tally."
"We have observed weak super paramagnetism and hysteresis in the samples of both GO (graphene oxide) and RGO due to presence of functionalized groups and other defects in the layered carbon structures. sciencedirect.com/science/articl…