many otherwise smart seeming people claiming that the risk of harm from vaccination is very small.
no. we don't know what the risks are. because: 🧵
no. we don't know what the risks are. because: 🧵
1. there's no rigorously collection of adverse events. only passive systems like VAERS. VAERS, known to be subject to massive underreporting, *is* seeing many times more reports than the increased rate of vaccination alone would predict. this is ignored by 'authorities' so far.
2. there is no routine testing for subclinical damage post vaccination. nor was there any biomarker testing for the possibility of such damage in the trials - for instance micro clots.
there is circumstantial evidence supporting delayed vaccine harm in the greatly elevated numbers of athletes suffering cardiac events in the period since vaccination campaigns began.
"but almost 4 billion have been vaccinated, we'd know if they were causing harm!"
people thought smoking was safe for a long time, then we figured out it's not safe.
turns out we have to study with care and diligence to figure out that some things are harming us.
people thought smoking was safe for a long time, then we figured out it's not safe.
turns out we have to study with care and diligence to figure out that some things are harming us.
(as we know, institutions may not be well incentivised to help with that kind of project, to put it lightly)
another way vaccination can harm is by putting users at greater risk of contracting the virus (family) they were designed to target (!). there's mounting evidence consistent with this already happening. some examples collected here:
https://twitter.com/mormo_music/status/1474278253338714138?t=4X4Wk7KKX8sD9MfgMxVxXg&s=19
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
