Been busy this holiday break. First PTO I've taken all year, and I'm losing some even with being off since Dec. 8, so catching up on a lot of stuff.
But, as promised, here's the Somatic Hypermutation thread to accompany the Omicron vaccine response thread, yesterday.
Sorry, lots of family and professional stuff to do, today, threads get interrupted.
So. I'm gonna skip a LOT of Immunology, here, so if you have questions or need to fill in gaps in your understanding, feel free to ask questions on the thread or DM.
Down to brass tacks: B Cells mature into Plasma Cells that make antibodies. But the core of antibody diversity is controlled by your B cell population.
Your B Cells contain the genes to make antibodies, which are proteins. DNA is nothin' but a blueprint to make proteins.
Evolution is a slow motherfucker, even allowing for the background rate of mutations (each of your cells has about 150 - 200 mistakes in their nuclear DNA that make your DNA different from that you received from your parents).
Nature, on the other hand, is beautiful in its diversity, & that diversity includes a plethora of ways to kill you in both spectacularly gruesome and boringly mundane ways.
Most of which involve foreign proteins of some type, against which, your immune system maintains defenses.
Now, if we waited for normal DNA mutation to shape our evolutionary response against new threats, nature would far outstrip our ability to create antibodies that bind to new threats.
In the bone marrow, as B cells for, the genes that code for the B cell receptors (which are just surface bound antibodies, for all practical purposes) are to some degree mixed and matched.
So your naive B cell population has a variety of antibody prototypes ready to go, just nowhere near enough to keep up with nature's assaults.
When an invader pops up and its proteins get presented to T helper cells, the T helpers that recognize proteins similar (but probably not exactly matched) to the invader proteins, go find a B cell in the lymph node that has the closest-matching proto-antibody to the invader.
Those B cells then get cloned in the lymph node at a tremendous rate. But they're not exactly matched to the invader, they're just close enough.
To get better affinity (binding strength) for the antibodies expressed on those B cells, mutations are deliberately introduced during the cloning process.
This process of deliberate mutation is called omatic hypermutation. It's about one million fold faster than normal evolution, and its why you can produce a massive variety of antibodies without altering your DNA.
(Sorry - SOMATIC Hypermutation - my S key is sticking).
These mutations are unique to your B cells (which are somatic, or post-germinal cells). You will not pass these mutation on to your children.
Your children can benefit from your immune memory, however, and your mother's IgGs were transported across the placenta to your by the FcRn receptor, and after birth you got more of them in breast milk.
This is one reason why breastfeeding is so important - maternal IgGs in breast milk provide a substrate for jumpstarting the infant's immune system.
IgGs are a specific type of antibody - sorry for the jargon - the kind elicited by the vaccines we have right now for COVID and also the only kind passed across the placenta.
Back to the cloned B cells in the lymph nodes:
The cloned B cells express a variety of antibodies - variations on a theme of the invader protein. Some are good matches, some just kinda match. But those kinda matches are important: they are they key to why boosting against original flavor SARS-CoV-2 will help against Omicron.
Those mutated B Cells are culled. Any that stray *too* far from the original are killed, as are any that happen to land on sequences expressed by your own proteins - but when that editing function breaks down, you can get certain kinds of B cell-driven autoimmune diseases.
(Those auto-immune diseases are one of my professional specializations).
But there is still a decent spread of randomly mutated antibodies in the remaining B Cell population.
The reason for that is that evolution has landed on this elegant solution to viral evolution - those random mutations will, by chance, contain some antibodies that will respond to any given mutation the virus may undergo.
Now, this is an iterative process, so the first exposure does not produce that large a repertoire of slightly off-target B Cells, but the second one makes more, and a third exposure really shoots them through the roof.
So you see what I am getting at, tight? Your first vaccination made a lot of antibodies against original flavor spike, the second got you a few Omicron killers and the third got you a lot more Omicron killers.
Now, even after the third shot, the Omicron killers are in the minority of antibodies you make, but there are a lot more of them than before.
So post-boost, after just one or two somatic hypermutation passes after you get infected with Omicron, you are ready to go, rather than the (for example) 8 or more passes you'd need if you were completely unexposed, or the 4 or more you'd need after just a double vax.
You'll probably still get some symptoms if boosted, but in most people, they'll go away quickly as the B Cell population homes in post haste.
So, this is the mechanism by which you can develop immunity to a variant you've never encountered by repeatedly boosting against the original.
Is it as good as an Omicron booster?
No.
Is it a damn sight better than just the two-shot original vax?
Damn straight.
For the curious, here's a decent video on the somatic hypermutation process:
Udarnik out. Night, all.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
OK, quick rundown on the reading I've been doing this morning on booster efficacy and Omicron.
Most of the data we have is from the UK, and most if it isn't exactly garbage, but it is highly contaminated: there is as much noise as signal.
First, to set the stage, the UK has about a 34% booster rate. That *should* give some decent statistical basis for analysis - but it doesn't.
The UK preferentially boostered the at-risk - elderly and immunocompromised.
That means that their population-level booster stats are going to show more rapid declines than the *actual* population level booster stats - those folks' immune systems don't mount as rigorous a response, nor do they maintain as strong a memory function.
Where is Tyson coming from? A knee-jerk response to the post-modernist nonsense of the '90s, where tenured idiots maintained that the fact that scientists were biased meant that the scientific process was, regardless of time span, not deserving of privilege as a "way of knowing".
This is 100% wrong. Rare events with significant health impact regularly result in FDA clinical holds, temporary restrictions in distribution, or even permanent withdrawal. The FDA is more apt to act the the wider the use of the drug in people with no other health concerns.
For example, birth control gets more scrutiny than oncology drugs.
Trovafloxacin was withdrawn in the EU and severely restricted in the US based on 14 cases of liver failure in roughly 2.5 million administrations.
The public health risk / benefit calculation is also affected by other drugs on the market. The fact that we have 2 other effective vaccines without this cloud hanging over them also influences the FDA's decision.
I've seen quite a bit of nonsense from a variety of people pushing a narrative of "our kids will have PTSD from this year" and "we'll never undo the damage" from the lost schooling.
Horse shit.
In the wake of Gagarin's historic flight, let me remind you that he lost nearly *4 years* of schooling during the German occupation. I think he did OK.
Yes, we will need to conduct some remedial education, but if kids suffer from this, it will be due to lack of will to put resources against the problem. I would also note many of the people screaming about this are loathe to spend tax money on education in normal times.
There are a few people who follow me on here at least in part because of COVID, and for those I want to riff on this finding to explain some of my current attitudes, and in the true spirit of a Cargo Cult Scientist, also explain what data will *make me change my mind*.
So @sailorrooscout is an expert, so definitely listen to what they have to say about T cells and other elements of the immune system.
But you will have also, almost definitely, heard right wing pundits, especially a few months ago, espousing the idea that T cell immunity was sufficient for protection from COVID.