This is the most important tweet of the next ten years in politics:
Donald Trump is appealing to Hispanic men who work for a living and who do not vote Republican.
2022 will be a very pivotal year in the history of coalitions.
P.S. A word on California redistricting…
If you are seriously arguing that all was legit with the commission in California, then you either have no first-hand, insider knowledge OR…
you’re a full-time fraud as an election “guru”…
Which is it?
Ever wonder why, with all their smears and jealousy, they routinely offer analysis that is two years too late, at least?
We all have personal political views. The difference is that some of us know if we offer up our own as legitimate analysis, we’ll be wrong more than right.
Further, some of us care more about being right than we do about helping those we agree with, which unfortunately, is increasingly rare in this business.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Presidents can talk to staff about whether they were robbed of re-election.
1/6 Commission is D.C.’s second chance to legally prevent Donald Trump from running against whomever and beating them in 2024, and a pretext for dissenter persecution.
The House Republican report doesn’t at all read like a partisan conclusion. In the end, Trump listened to advisors and refrained from pushing DOJ, which Democratic Presidents do without fear. Biden is using DOJ to do the bidding for Democrats on redistricting, right now.
Please.
Nobody can seriously dispute the prior claim re: Biden using DOJ as a political weapon on redistricting. Sue Texas, but splitting Albuquerque in 2, Portland in 4, etc. w/o care for county or geo integrity are somehow perfectly reasonable and do not warrant DOJ?
Is nobody remotely interested in "WHY" Jussie Smollett faked a hate crime?
@VP@KamalaHarris & @CoryBooker—two senators with presidential aspirations and no legislative achievements to speak of, had just revealed an anti-lynching bill.
I have a very hard time believing media wouldn't be exploring their personal relationship in more detail if it appeared a rightwing celebrity faked an event that coincidentally helped push Republican legislation sponsored by a friend.
I'm not a big believer in coincidence.
These tweets were very clearly coordinated. Look at the language they share and the time between them, both of which being right after the story made headlines in gateway liberal publications.
1. I'm highly skeptical of the assertion that a SCOTUS ruling against Roe would result in political blowback favoring Democrats.
There are a number of reasons, which I will list.
But to sum, the "pro-choice" designation is no longer dominant, and it no longer means what it did.
2. In "SELECT A COLUMN DEMOGRAPHIC VARIABLE", choose "ABORTION DESIGNATION", and load the table.
Aside from the nation being split on the designation, a significant number of those who refer to themselves as "pro-choice" do not oppose such restrictions. application.marketsight.com/app/ItemView.a…
3. Forget 15 weeks. More than 1/5 "pro-choice" voters do support the heartbeat bill; more than a third (33.4) support banning abortion after the "Pain" threshold is reached; and 54.6% support bans on late-term abortion in the final 3 months. application.marketsight.com/app/ItemView.a…
"I would never point a gun at someone and pull the trigger."
See, that's a problem. Any responsible gun owner knows the first part of that sentence is enough. You never point a firearm at anyone, period. Not unless you intend to use it.
And triggers don't pull themselves.
I smell an attempt to blame firearm manufacturers for a privileged, entitled celebrity who had no business pointing a weapon at anyone, killing his colleague.
Triggers don't pull—squeeze actually, never pull—themselves. That doesn't happen.