They both claim the the change in guidelines is based on science but I have yet to see anything released that actually shows the science they used for their decision making. 2/
For background, you may want to read this thread about when it is appropriate to use PCR, rapid tests, and antibody tests with their strengths and weaknesses (
Before Omicron, evidence from 113 studies in 17 countries found the mean period of infectiousness and risk of transmission could be somewhere between 2-3 days before and 8 days after symptom onset, well past the 5 days in the new guidance ( thelancet.com/journals/lance… ). 4/
For some real-world data, Dr. Erin Bromage oversees testing of thousands of people each week in workplace surveillance programs (
). Some people are tested weekly and some daily with millions of tests over the past 18 months. 5/
They have been using PCR tests since the beginning but over the last 9 months have been supplementing with rapid tests. As we saw above the ability of PCR tests to detect very low levels of virus meant they saw people test positive for months after recovery. 6/
They can now use RATs as a good balance to help determine when someone has a very low likelihood to transmit the virus to others. 7/
He provides a recent example of someone who was asymptomatic. The rapid test started showing they were positive 3 days after exposure to the virus when viral loads became high enough to be detected. 8/
As you can see from how dark the test line is, the person still had a large viral load in their nose 8 days after testing positive. Since this is a rapid test, it only shows positive when someone has a viral load high enough for the person likely to be infectious. 9/
Looking at 59 people in their surveillance program with rapid tests, the fastest someone cleared the virus was 6 days and the longest was 8.5 days. 10/
Dr. Bromage is baffled by the new CDC guidelines that allow people to stop isolating 5 days after testing positive for COVID-19 unless you have a fever since everyone in his surveillance program still has high viral loads consistent with being infectious at 5 days. 11/
Dr. Jennifer Glass who had 3 doses of Pfizer (3rd received 2.5 months ago) and still had a breakthrough infection documented her rapid test results (
She believes she was exposed to COVID-19 at a conference in New Orleans and tested negative 3 days before her symptoms started when she traveled home. She had a faint positive line the first day she experienced a slight headache, stuffy nose, and muscle aches. 13/
An hour and a half later she retested and had a much stronger positive line. Six hours later she had an even stronger positive result with the rapid test. The following day she tested positive from a PCR test, and continued to test positive on a rapid test for 10 days. 14/
She no longer had symptoms on day 5 so by the new CDC guidelines could have stopped isolating, but continued to have viral loads high enough on day 10 for a rapid test to turn positive which means she is likely still infectious. 15/
On Day 11 she finally tested negative on a rapid test (
). While testing positive on a rapid test is not a guarantee that a person is infectious, there is a much higher probability that the person is currently infectious than with a PCR test. 16/
There are some studies looking at the sensitivity of rapid tests with Omicron and the best place to swab now:
COVID-19: Ontario and UK early estimates of Omicron severity
Both Ontario and the UK recently released reports on early estimates of Omicron severity with the UK also looking at data including children. H/T: @Billius27 & @ASPphysician 🧵1/
First, Ontario used a matched cohort study with 6,314 Omicron cases matched with at least 1 Delta case based on age, gender, and onset date ( publichealthontario.ca/-/media/docume… ). 2/
A big caveat to their study is the median age of cases was 30 for Delta and 28 for Omicron so a study population that was on the lower end of hospitalization risk in the first place. 3/
COVID-19: Rapid test sensitivity with Omicron and where to swab
A couple of studies on the sensitivity of rapid tests with Omicron have recently been released. The first is a pre-print that evaluated 7 rapid tests ( medrxiv.org/content/10.110… ). 🧵1/ FYI @SabiVM,@imgrund,@DFisman
They found that detection of Omicron is the first variant of concern (VOC) that showed a tendency towards lower analytical sensitivity across tests. They found a considerable difference in sensitivity patterns between tests across variants including Omicron. 2/
The differences in analytical sensitivity between rapid tests might be explained by the different epitopes each test is looking for in the virus and potentially impacted differently from mutations in the nucleocapsid protein that most tests use (not the spike). 3/
COVID-19: When to use PCR, Rapid Tests, and Antibody Tests
A study looks at diagnostics for COVID-19 and their role to move from pandemic response to pandemic control ( thelancet.com/journals/lance… ). H/T: @EricTopol 🧵1/
There are 3 major methods for the detection of COVID-19 virus infection. Molecular tests (PCR) are highly sensitive and specific at detecting viral RNA and can detect it at very low levels. 2/
The PCR method of test is recommended by the WHO for confirming diagnosis of individuals who are symptomatic for activating public health measures. 3/
The posted PPE/N95 checklist (see image) is dated more than a year ago and still calls for N95 protection only when certain aerosol generating procedures (AGPs) are present. I fixed it for them... 2/
Ironically breathing, talking, exercising, shouting, and coughing generates more aerosols than the last two AGPs on their list (NIPPV and HHFNO) which were measured in this research study ( …-publications.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/an… ). 3/
[Part 2 of 2] COVID-19: Why respiratory viruses surge in winter
In part 1 we looked at the seasonality of respiratory viruses in the human population and the effect of environmental factors on stability and transmission of respiratory viruses (
We continue with part 2 focusing on the effect of environmental factors on the host airway antiviral defense ( annualreviews.org/doi/10.1146/an… ). 2/
The mucosal surface of the respiratory tract is continuously exposed to inhaled environmental air that contains pollutants and pathogens but there are multiple defense systems that prevent infection. 3/
In temperate regions, annual epidemics of the common cold and influenza hit the human population like clockwork in the winter season (barring pandemics) so why is that? 2/
There are multiple factors that affect respiratory virus transmission including seasonal environmental factors which modulate host airway immune response and affect viability and transmission of viruses. Human behaviours also affect rates. 3/