1/ Happy New Year! 🎉🍾

Let’s start the year off right by trying to improve #fintwit.

My humble contribution today is a small thread on how to identify (and then roundly ignore) finance Twitter grifters…

🧵👉👉
2/
1⃣ Grifters talk a lot about specific trades and (post-facto) outcomes.

Good follows talk about process, principles, and about how they might be wrong. Not as sexy but much more useful.
3/
2⃣ Grifters make “predictions” that are hard to falsify. Even worse are the ones that tell you about predictions they made before. Even if accompanied by a timestamp, this is nearly worthless.
4/ Grifters think: “I’ll just retweet the half of my predictions that I was right about and I *know* they’ll ignore the other ones."
5/
3⃣ Grifters make insanely confident or large predictions. “Elliot-wave Ichimoku breakout pattern. Target SPX price of [20% higher].”

This is nuts. If you really could make good predictions this big in SPX, you’d be a trillionaire. SPX edges are measured in fractions of bps.
6/
4⃣ Grifters make it feel like they’re on to a deep secret, and that they’re doing you a favor by telling you tiny pieces of it. This is basically the QAnon playbook applied to grifting.
7/ We’re all suckers for a story, a mystery. The best grifters are *really* good at spinning a mystery around themselves. Don’t be fooled!
8/
5⃣ Grifters shitpost a lot. This doesn’t mean all shitposters are grifters, but it’s definitely a thing. The sales cycle is as old as the hills:

👆Know
✌️Like
🤟Trust
9/ Shitposting is a way to get a lot of eyeballs. So it takes care of the “know” part of the equation.

If they’re decent at shitposting, then some fraction of readers will enjoy that. That takes care of the “like” part.

Finally the “trust” part. See 4⃣ above.
10/
6⃣ Grifters set themselves up against “the man”, however they define it. Pro traders, market makers, people inside the marble hallways of Wall Street, etc.

This is another “trust” technique: “I’m on your side, telling you the stuff *they* don’t want you to hear.”
11/ What they’re actually telling you is the stuff *you* want to hear:

- that trading isn’t that hard
- that “people overcomplicate options”
- that there’s an easy way for the little guy to get ahead.
12/
7⃣ Finally and most importantly, grifters care a lot about acquiring viewers/customers.

Remember, they don’t actually have any value to offer you. Over time, the people that got suckered in will leave.
13/ So grifters need to work hard to replace all that churn. Flash sales, limited time offers, special events, etc.

We’re so used to this stuff that we forget how artificial and stupid it is.
14/ Thoughts? What am I missing?

/END
15/ Update based on the conversations I've had today due to this thread:

If you sell services/info/etc to retail, I certainly don't believe that *automatically* makes you a grifter.

Maybe 5-year-ago me did, but I've learned so much that has made me change that tune.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Agustin Lebron

Agustin Lebron Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AgustinLebron3

31 Dec 21
1/ In the spirit of end-of-year housecleaning, here are some things I believe about the crypto world as we close 2021.

Reasoned disagreements *very* welcome!

👉👉👉
2/ Self-custodying of important things (wallets, etc) is not a viable long-term solution if 100x'ing crypto is a goal.

My mom can't be trusted to have the necessary opsec to handle her $ in irrecoverable ways.
3/ Relatedly, code-is-law also isn't viable long-term. There will need to be mechanisms akin to our legal system to be able to "sue" to get your stuff back, adjudicate disputes, etc.
Read 14 tweets
15 Dec 21
1/ So I’ve been thinking a lot recently about arguments we see on the Twitter.

One case in point is the “crypto is the future” people vs the “crypto is a scam” people.

But what follows applies broadly. 👉👉👉
2/ Yes, there are people out there who just want to argue.

But I assume we all block them already.

I want to talk about (and to) those of us who want honest truth-seeking conversations, but sometimes get bogged down in pointless debates.
3/ I offer a mental model to help frame both our own thoughts and those of others.

This model is mine, but it’s also not mine in the sense that it’s an amalgamation of all the things I’ve learned and read and half-forgotten over the years. Here goes…
Read 12 tweets
31 Oct 21
1/ A Sunday question thread: why do American parents care so much about their kids' sports?

👉👉👉
2/ Numbers vary but from a cursory look, somewhere between 55% and 65% of American children between 6-17 play some form of organized team sports (i.e. with instructors and coaches).

Add in the tennis, golf, running, and other individual sports and you're surely around 70%.
3/ The time investment is big, and the financial investment too. A lot of high schools are oriented around their sports teams (Friday Night Lights, etc). But why!?!?

Let's look at some reasons:
Read 14 tweets
23 Oct 21
Watched the new Bond last night.

I think I've discovered a common cognitive error which I'm going to label the Physical Embodiment Fallacy.
In this and many other superhero movies, the bad guy creates/steals some horrifying new piece of technology which is going to kill millions, enslave the world, etc.
The solution in every movie is simple: kill the bad guy and destroy his evil lair.

I.e. eliminate the physical embodiment of the problem, and the problem is solved.
Read 9 tweets
13 Oct 21
1/ The key to understanding "news" is to think about probabilities and incentives. A thread... 👉👉👉
2/ Let's say you're trying to estimate the chances of some future event happening.

As an example, let's take P(Trump runs for President in 2024).
3/ So you read the news about such an event. CNN, FoxNews, Politico, whatever. And it feels like a steady drip of "news" about tiny events which could affect that probability.

So how do we integrate all these pieces of information into a prediction?
Read 15 tweets
1 Oct 21
1/ A short thread about the relationship between academic finance and real $ trading. 👉👉👉
2/ First of all, I need to get something off my chest. I loved the Asimov Foundation books as a kid.

Much like Paul Krugman, the idea of doing math to understand complex societies, and to predict their evolution, was transfixing. And still is.
3/ I used to do mathematical modeling of complex systems before I even knew it was a thing.

When I was working as an engineer (and running a lot), I spent more time that I'll admit trying to build a model of the human lactate response to exercise. For fun.
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(