Reassurance? Not to sane parents. Certainly not to children.
But yes, very much to your masters in the teaching unions.
Do tell us, will you wear a mask for six hours a day?
But yes, very much to your masters in the teaching unions.
Do tell us, will you wear a mask for six hours a day?
https://twitter.com/nadhimzahawi/status/1477661959629778948
Humane heads should know that this is guidance. Not only are they not obliged to implement it, they have an independent duty to undertake a risk assessment of the effect of continuous mask wearing on children. Following government advice is no answer or substitute.
Parents shld knw that they have a right to refuse to consent to their children being tested or wearing masks, *irrespective* of whether they would be exempt were there a legal requirement (eg were children over 13 in a shop).
They should not fear to use their power to stop this.
They should not fear to use their power to stop this.
As I said here, demand to see the risk assessment that considers the potential harm to children from the risk of infection with SARS-CoV-2 and the harm of wearing masks. If it doesn’t do that, it cannot be compliant with statutory obligations. Use these two expert reports.
https://twitter.com/Francis_Hoar/status/1477789901068414979
Ten hours in some cases.
Thank goodness for teachers with humanity like this one. They put much of the rest of their profession - and particularly its unions - to shame.
Thank goodness for teachers with humanity like this one. They put much of the rest of their profession - and particularly its unions - to shame.
https://twitter.com/BensBookmarks/status/1477909407291912194
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
