During 2021, lots of important work on #ArchivalSilences came out. Scholars from various disciplines using different methods explored what, how, and why it is missing from the historical record--and its implications.
In this thread, I would like to highlight some. 1/
Celeste Henery wrote about Rosa who left a "rebellious archival footprint" by risking free speech and eventual death to tell her truth. 2/ aaihs.org/excavating-the…
.@janasinakeck assessed data ethics & power balances when using digitized material, and asked:
"Who gets to be remembered and historicized by ways of (digital) record creation and analysis? Who is forgotten or silenced...?" 3/ ghi-dc.org/fileadmin/publ…
.@shannonmattern essay on 'nothingness' as an ontological entity offered, among others, a nice discussion about archival silences & the underlying regimes of exclusion and erasure of people. 5/ placesjournal.org/article/how-to…
The @InvisibleAus bot continued tirelessly to resurface and reinscribe into the historical record people who were meant to be dehumanized through official policies. 7/
This @librarycompany online exhibition went behind the scene exploring "collecting and curation practices over nearly 300 years" to make visible "unseen people, places, meanings, and aesthetics." 8/ librarycompany.org/digital-imperf…
.@TimeTravelAllie & @juliannenyhan interrogated power asymmetries in colonial catalogues asking: "do data-driven approaches further entrench archival absences and silences? Can digital approaches be used to highlight or recover absent data?" 9/ academic.oup.com/dsh/advance-ar…
.@jmddrake 's article about the "sound of silence" and the "sight of absence" is an ethnography of archives "as dialectical processes that concentrate and codify power." 10/
.@professorcaz 's book "Urgent Archives: Enacting Liberatory Memory Work" discusses how archives are "oppressive by design" and calls archivists to disrupt this cycle of oppression *in the present*. 11/ bookshop.org/books/urgent-a…
Wonderful to see @toniasutherland being funded to conduct important, reparative work on "Redescription as Restorative Justice in American Archives" to rectify harmful description & enact social justice. 13/
I think I will wrap this thread up. This is of course only a small selection of projects and scholarship. You can also see other previous threads on this topic. 14/14
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
How can we 'see' people whose culture was meant to be suppressed in the historical record?
Wet plate photography in the 1800s made tattoos disappear. This photographic method "used by European settlers served to erase this cultural marker" and Māori intangible heritage. 1/ petapixel.com/2018/07/09/wet…
When women are erased from the historical record because "historically it has been assumed that uncredited [books] were made by men," their bodies tell a different story. #gender#archivalsilences 2/ atlasobscura.com/articles/medie…
The online availability of massive amounts of digitized material creates a false sense of accomplishment when we find that one specific item that is useful to our research.
In the process, we miss serendipity and context.
A thread in praise of aggregates. 1/
Each item in an archives is part of aggregations, i.e. "sets of records whose affinity results from their mode of creation, assembly, maintenance, or use by the record’s creator or whose unity was imposed during archival processing." 2/ dictionary.archivists.org/entry/aggregat…
Aggregations are parts of a hierarchical whole (fonds or record group).
Those who use physical archives and finding aids know that the goal of archival description is to reflect not only the content, but also the intricate relationships (context) among material. 3/
Since pretty much everyone under quarantine has to use digitized primary sources, I thought it might be useful to point to #digitalarchives that *explicitly* acknowledge & caution users abt #archivalsilences in their contents, and describe their work to rectify them.
A thread.
1/ A note: Most people appreciate the easiness of online access to archival material, but tend to forget that all #digitization is selective.
2/ This means that what you see online is usually not “everything” that an institution holds abt a topic. It's important to understand the digitized together w the physical. Even if you can't access physical records now, you'll be able to better contextualize what you see online.