First, let me take you exactly to where to find these results:
• for now, it is the only graph on the "Wastewater" tab
• hosted at @ucalgaryCHI, the results are province-wide including years of innovative work by @UAlberta, @UCalgary, @ACWAWater et al
Now, although the CMOH said on 7 Dec 2021 it was just about here, after that I could find no information from CMOH, AB Health, or GoA about where to find the website, or how to use it.
It is as if the Gov had been suppressing this information for so long, it sorta squeezed out.
In May when I built my #BalancedScorecard, I included @ucalgaryCHI wastewater sampling:
• it remains independent of government reporting
• not completely reliant on GoA funding
• everyone poops; not everyone gets swabbed
• wastewater sampling was a few days ahead of PCR
During Aug long weekend, I focussed on independent, daily R from @imgrund + wastewater sampling from @ucalgaryCHI, because:
• GoA's 28 July 2021 decimation of Test/Trace/Isolate would understate cases
• GoA was suppressing Alberta-wide results eg. UofA
In September, when we finally saw disinformation to cabinet in June to launch 4th wave:
• more empty promises about making wastewater results available
• which took until Dec to shart publicly
• did we ever see any local response, rather than top-down?
With above screenshot, I may have subtweeted @jvipondmd@PopAlberta@GosiaGasperoPhD with CMOH's notorious "SHIFTING FROM PANDEMIC TO ENDEMIC" document that:
• over-relied on highly-vaxed UK to predict AB Hospital
• cherry-picked worst to become worst
But I digress. Now that we have Alberta-wide wastewater sampling results:
• in a vacuum of information from PCR testing suppressed
• and rapid-testing results unavailable
• let's use it while we got it.
1. Click on the name of your town or city on the map of Alberta on the right.
This will give you the graph for eg. Edmonton, which has been in just as much trouble as Calgary, and for which there are results since June 2020.
Why didn't we see that before, you may ask? Me too.
2. "Comparing sites is also problematic because different communities have different proportions of residential and industrial water use contributing to their municipal wastewater. The most important signals to compare are within a given community by following trends over time."
That's what most of us are looking for anyway:
• how is my town or city doing?
• how is the town or city of my loved ones, or my workplace, doing?
• oh ya, I remember we had it pretty bad around here before - you can see that confirmed in the wastewater sampling too, eh
"What the heck is this?" you may ask.
• Starting Date - eg. you can look since 1 July, for launch of the 4th Wave, or from 25 Nov, for neglect of the Omicron Wave
• Raw v Normalized - See Dr Parker explanation ⤵️
• I'll try to be your PhD whisperer
3. Raw v Normalized?
Raw = count of virus independent of whether lots of rainwater got into sewer, or industrial/residential mix
Normalized = uses fecal microbiota marker like Pepper Mild Mottle Virus* to focus on human poop in the wastewater.
* resists making jalapeño joke
4. N1, N2 or Average?
N1, N2, etc. are target sites on the virus that the wastewater sampling lab looks for.
If you want to know way more than me on this, read:
True picture (therefore control) of #COVID19AB has been suppressed by 28 July 2021 Public Health Order that decimated Test/Trace/Isolate during 4th Wave.
Therefore we have to look at other signals like Wastewater Sampling, independent Daily R, and help from @bcCOVID19group...
@bcCOVID19group Dr Karlen had to switch from Cases to Hospital Admissions, and then analyze the lower testing volumes and higher test %, to explain Alberta's Urban/Rural Delta Wave.
Let's look at each one individually. Here:
• Virus measures N1 & N2 compared to new PCR swab test cases, and to test positivity
• As Dr Parkins explains (not Parker as I misstated above), wastewater virus sampling predicts both PCR swab test cases & positivity by about 6 days
Here, we see just how good the correlation between wastewater sampling results, and the 5-day moving average of daily new cases from swab tests.
Just as Dr Karlen at UVic infers underreported Cases from Hospital Admissions, we'll be able to infer them from Wastewater Sampling.
We see that here:
• Waves 2 & 3, qty of actual cases predicted 6 days earlier from wastewater sampling model was close.
• actual cases dropped off as swab testing capacity saturated ~ 20K tests/day
• in Wave 4, actual cases were below model, similar to what Dr Karlen saw.
Since we're here, let's look at Dr Karlen's 29 Dec model.
What's even scarier, is that Dr Karlen modelled these outcomes on 29 Dec, before AB Health had updated Hospital Admissions since 22 Dec (3.5/day/million people).
His next update will have the latest (currently 9.1).
2.6x higher, and climbing Omicron-fast.
I wish there were a simple formula like:
Cases = a x Wastewater + b
But we have to work more from trends than data points.
Dr Karlen has explained that pandemics have trends with the same slope for a while, than a switch to a new one. @GosiaGasperoPhD shows this too.
@GosiaGasperoPhD In the fall, I attempted to correlate @imgrund R with @ucalgaryCHI Wastewater project, who are inferring Cases from wastewater.
A different approach than @bcCOVID19group use of Hospital Admissions.
I know I lost some of you moving from wastewater into his modelling, but may have picked up some ID docs, epidemiologists, engineers, etc along the way who are able to see the connections better than me.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Yesterday, the CMOH made some claims about the health system impact in the UK that are demonstrably untrue, at least with the UK's official stats that were available at the time.
"In countries like the UK and Denmark, where Omicron is spreading widely, their early reports of health system impact indicate that hospital and ICU admissions are not rising as quickly as in previous waves."
Tender shoots of good news emerging from the frozen IPAC ground covering LTC, DSL and Hospices:
• for those with family or family there
• who work there
• who care about the people who work there
See Q&A: "COVID-19 Requirements for Licensed Supportive Living, Long-Term Care & Hospice Settings" with PPE improvements for:
• staff option: fit-tested N95, non-fit tested N95, or seal-checked KN95
• visitor option: seal-checked KN95 or Blue Leakie™️ offered by facility
Staff:
"Effective immediately, and as supplies allow, it is recommended that all staff use either a well-
fitted surgical/procedure mask OR a seal-checked respirator continuously while on shift."
No more BlueLeakie™️ for the undervalued HCAs caring for infected residents.
Let's zoom further into this graph, and isolate ages 5-11:
• Why was it at 4.7% before the vaccine campaign for this age group even started?
• Since when did age 5-11 start getting vaccinated in May?
• 4.7% of 391,430 kids this age is about 18,400 kids.
Something's wrong.🧐
4.7%, or 18,400, is way too many kids age 5-11 to be so at risk from COVID-19 that they get an adult dose before Health Canada has even approved a paediatric dose.
Now that you have had some time to:
• open your Xmas gifts
• compare what friends & family have
• learned how important it is to prevent catching Omicron*
I wanted to give you some updates.
*Even if mild, you don't want to catch it and miss work/school. That has a cost too.
If you did not get (in my order of preference) enough of this Personal Protective Equipment (PPE) for Xmas, from LEGITIMATE sources, time to buy:
• elastomeric respirator that seals to your face like a diver's mask
• comfortable (K, N, or some other prefix-) 95