.@MattBruenig suggests a very direct form of competition policy: when an industry is concentrated, have the state buy and manage one of the oligopolists in the public interest. peoplespolicyproject.org/2022/01/04/why…
i/
Two concerns immediately spring to mind:
(1) How do you set the price of the acquisition? (The premium demanded over prior-to-government-interest market cap will be very high if you just let the sellers name their price.)
ii/
(2) As an institutional matter, how should such a firm be managed, so that it neither behaves as a pure profit maximizer (which would just continue the oligopoly squeeze) nor is captured by one stakeholder (industry peers, vendors, customers) at the expense of others?
iii/
These questions aren't intended as a veiled "it's not practical!" critique. I'd love to see a public option in many, perhaps most industries, to keep private players honest. But I think they do need to be addressed.
/fin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
When demand increases, two things typically both happen: quantities supplied increase and price increases. There is a name in economics for the quantitive relationship between these two effects: "price elasticity of supply". 1/
A good "infinitely" elastically supplied would see no price change at all in response to an increase in demand. All of the effect would be absorbed by an increase in quantity supplied. 2/
A good completely inelastically supplied would simply be price-rationed. In response to an increase in demand, no additional units would be produced at all, the fixed quantity supplied would just be allocated to the highest bidders, pushing all response into price. 3/
there’s a sense in which Donald Trump’s administration was the best thing that could happen to the professional-managerial class that most loathed him. he drew all kinds of fire that otherwise would turn towards them. 1/
i found this particularly striking with respect to @jbarro, who five years ago, in the wake of Trump’s election, became a pretty full-throated defender of elites and deference to elite guidance. 3/
So often people tell me that, sigh, the root of human suffering is coordination problems, that if only we could overcome our prisoners' dilemmas, what a better world we'd have of it. This misses a crucial point @VitalikButerin makes. 2/
The bones of nearly all functional social institutions are coordination problems. We rely upon them. No government wld be stable if incumbency + existing procedure weren't a hard-to-reroute Schelling point. Market competition depends on diverse producers failing to coordinate. 3/
@rplzzz nothing to apologize for! i don't think you'll be surprised i see it differently. if we're in a game with two sides, they are better characterized as "activists" and "everyone else" than left vs right or trumpist antivaxxers vs the rest of us or all of that. 1/
@rplzzz most of the unvaccinated are not diehard (they die too easily) political intransigents. yet most are either attached to minority communities or trumpish political communities. but most of the unvaccinated attached to trumpist political communities are not politically motivated 2/
@rplzzz intransigents, but when they are surveyed express a broad range of hesitancies not dissimilar from those of minority communities — prefer to wait and see, don't want to be guinea pig, not so worried about COVID, can't afford time off for side effects — etc. 3/
polio vaccination is often performed sequentially, first with a very safe inactivated virus vaccine, then with a riskier attenuated live virus. the first vaccination renders the second one much less dangerous. cochrane.org/CD011260/BEHAV… 1/
given the extraordinary transmissibility of delta and frequent reports of usually mild “breakthrough infections”, i wonder if the end game here is that we’ll be dragged involuntarily through an analogous protocol. 2/
the role of vaccination becomes not to prevent infection, but to ensure the infection that eventually (hopefully) deepens and completes our immunity is very mild. 3/
i agree very much with @jp_koning, fiat money is not a meme. but i don't think characterizing it as a conventional debt instrument quite works either. 1/ jpkoning.blogspot.com/2021/07/the-do…
suppose Bill Gates were to issue a perpetual, never redeemable, non-interest-bearing Gatescoin. Bill Gates' solvency, on its own, would tell us little about its value. 2/
owing to his solvency, Bill Gates would have the capacity to *give* such a coin value, say by committing to put a floor under it in the market, or by creating circumstances in which markets perceive such a commitment. 3/