I was quoted in this @defense_news story about Morocco's expanding air defense capabilities. Don't feel like writing a blog post, so here's a thread on what little I was able to add with OSINT.
defensenews.com/global/mideast…
In December, a Spanish-language publication reported that Morocco had taken delivery of some very capable Chinese surface-to-air missiles (HQ-9B/FD-2000B).
defensa.com/africa-asia-pa…
Defensa.com said the missiles were deployed at Morocco's "first military base dedicated to long-range air defense ... near the city of Sidi Yahya el-Gharb" and published a May 2021 satellite image from @googleearth of the site.
There were only two analytic things I could add to the puzzle. Is this an air defense base? Has Morocco deployed the HQ-9B (FD-2000B) there. My answers are "yes" and "probably."
Is this an air defense base? Construction of the site corresponds with the reported 2017 agreement between Morocco and China. That suggests that, if this places houses air defense systems, it was purpose-built to house the systems supplied by China under this deal.
More importantly, we have one image of a Chinese-supplied Sky Dragon 50 in Morocco. We can geolocate the image to the base, which seems to wrap this question up in a nice, tidy package. Yes, this is Morocco's primary air defense base.
Does this site house the HQ-9B? That's a little murkier. There are a few satellite images of the location that show vehicles, but I didn't see a clear shot of an HQ-9B. That's the gold standard, but we don't have that as of January 2022. Someday soon, I presume.
On the other hand, we have a strong indication that this site was purpose built to house the Chinese-supplied air defense missiles. And, in the background of the Sky Dragon 50 image, we can see much larger garages -- presumably for larger SAMs.
Conveniently, the larger garages were the last to be constructed. One of the buildings wasn't even finished in the Sky Dragon 50 image, which really slowed my geolocation. This suggests Morocco planned to take delivery of something very much like the HQ-9.
The open source imagery can't confirm every detail of the reporting, but it certainly confirms the outlines -- that there was a China-Morocco air defense deal ~2017, that this base was built to house those systems, and that the deal included systems larger than the Sky Dragon 50.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dr. Jeffrey Lewis

Dr. Jeffrey Lewis Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ArmsControlWonk

6 Jan
A short thread on North Korea's "hypersonic" missile test. It's a MaRV. Image
All long-range missiles are hypersonic! The range of a ballistic missile is, to a first approximation, a function of the velocity of a missile at burnout. Any ballistic missile that travels more than a few hundred kilometers will be traveling faster than Mach 5 (1.75 km/s). ImageImage
What North Korea tested was a hypersonic glider. The system flew 700 km. The warhead separated at some point and glided for a few hundred kilometers, including a 120 km cross-range glide. I mocked up some trajectories; they're only sort of to scale. ImageImage
Read 10 tweets
23 Dec 21
This amazing reporting by @ZcohenCNN is exactly the kind of collaboration that @JamesMartinCNS wants to continue with @CNN and @planet. I think it is civil society at its best. A short thread.
In 2013, @JanesINTEL identified a missile base at this location; a few years later @fab_hinz noticed that the sit had changed significantly. We ultimately assessed the place was a Chinese constructed missile facility:
washingtonpost.com/world/national…
Our story prompted people in Congress to start asking questions. Eventually someone spilled the beans. The Trump Administration was actively withholding this information from Congress, @ZcohenCNN reported. cnn.com/2019/06/05/pol…
Read 19 tweets
17 Dec 21
I think this is a terrible mistake. A short thread.
First, there is no upside to threatening force at this late date. The Iran nuclear deal appears very much to be dead and I strongly suspect that the Iranians are en route to nuclear latency/opacity. Threatening the use of force is unlikely to alter that outcome in my opinion.
One problem with nonproliferation wonks is that we warn US officials about the dangers of a certain course of action, but after they do it anyway, we advise about how to mitigate those dangers. We call it being "policy relevant." People who treat drunks call it "enabling."
Read 11 tweets
16 Oct 21
No one should be surprised by orbital bombardment, although the glider is a nice touch. The Soviets deployed an orbital bombardment system in the 1970s. This is an old concept that is newly relevant as a way to defeat missile defenses.
I wrote a short thread last month on why I think orbital bombardment makes sense for Russia, China and North Korea -- especially if gliders mean they can improve accuracy.
But really, I've been banging on about orbital bombardment for several years now. It's obvious: The US put a missile defense system in Alaska to defend against missiles coming over the North Pole. What did you think Beijing, Moscow and Pyongyang will do? Just give up?
Read 5 tweets
10 Oct 21
"I am concerned that using a dead drop location your friend prepares makes me very vulnerable."

No shit, dude.

justice.gov/opa/press-rele…
"I must consider the possibility that l am communicating with an adversary who has intercepted my first message and is attempting to expose me. Would not such an adversary wish me to go to a place of his choosing, knowing that an amateur will be unlikely to detect surveillance?"
Read 5 tweets
6 Oct 21
Glad to see the Biden Administration resuming the Obama-era practice of being transparent about the size of the US nuclear stockpile. A thread.
Funny story. George W. Bush dramatically reduced the size of the nuclear stockpile -- but never took credit for it because the stockpile size was secret. He cut the stockpile in half and then by a further 15 percent.
Bush's record on reducing the size of the US nuclear stockpile is excellent. But no one knew it. There were even stories that he had slowed the pace of dismantlement, stories that turned out to be false. The moral to the story is that doing the right thing isn't always enough.
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(