worth noting that cumulative COVID cases and deaths in Australia remain waaaaaay lower than the US. kinda weird to look at those two lines and think they are similar!
Like, "we kept COVID at nearly zero until a weaker variant came along and most people were vaccinated" is.... a huge success! That's the goal! That's what winning looks like!
After April or May 2020, true "COVID Zero" was never on the table, and the rational goal of policy was always "keep things okay until widespread vaccination makes the mortality cost of widespread exposure acceptably low."
That the escape variant also happens to be less lethal and super contagious is just icing on the cake! Tons of people getting acquired immunity from a weaker variant after they've been given vax support is a great outcome!
Now obviously there's gonna be another bump of deaths here in January, but it's not gonna be anywhere near last winter's wave, and in the future we can expect recurrent waves to have ever-lower yields of deaths-per-infections.
Which means countries like Australia will be able to open up without experiencing deaths on the level of e.g. the US. They'll have just skipped the mortality cost of COVID we paid here.
That's an unmitigated endorsement of the Australian approach!
I think I'm in a very unusual position right now where I'm one of the *very few* people who has been a major COVID hawk for much of the last 18 months who is now actually pivoting towards COVID-is-over on the basis of the evidence and options.
Seems like we've got a lot of people who were always very dove-ish on COVID policy now claiming vindication (after a million deaths and the rise of a new milder variant, lol), and also a lot of hawks who just cannot break the addiction to meddlesomeness and fear.
Then there's me over here saying we should have had quarantine camps in April and May of 2020 and also it's absolutely nuts that places are going into lockdown right now what the heck people what on earth is your possible end goal here????
For the curious, here's excess death in the US.
Here in Quebec all non-essential businesses are closed, we have an actual *curfew* (no leaving your house 10 PM-5 AM), my classes have been moved online, and schools are I think delaying start as well!
Places of worship are closed, vaccine passports everywhere, etc. We are in almost as intense a lockdown right now as has been applied anywhere in the western world after June of 2020!
Which is why I have been angry-tweeting about Quebec COVID stats for the last few days!
Speaking of, a reminder that I made a forecast of Quebec hospitalizations a week or so ago! I made three scenarios: one where Case->ICU yield rates return to historic levels, one where they flatline at current low rates, and one where they keep falling.
On January 5, my 3 models predicted that there would be either 195, 252, or 425 ICU cases: 195 for the "Case->ICU yield keeps falling," 425 for the "return to normal" and 252 for in-between.
On January 5, there were 207 ICU cases.
My low scenario is looking pretty good!
Here's the rate at which official cases yield people in the ICU (with appropriate lags).
It keeps falling! Because the vaccines work and Omicron is somewhat less severe!
Just insane to me that we've got like 90% vaccinated in Quebec and yet we're acting like it's the apocalypse or something.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
What is the best empirical evidence that therapy actually improves mental health?
I am struggling to find anything credible.
This meta-analysis of 147 studies seems to suggest p-hacking is very common, publication bias is huge, and even with that the typical effect of therapy vs. care-as-usual is clinically insignificant. pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21770842/
This more recent one specifically on CBT for adult depression suggests that CBT has been wildly overrated by creative research practices. journals.sagepub.com/doi/abs/10.117…
My take is: in general, for decades, Capitol security forces have use too little violence to dispense with people who should be allowed to become the martyrs they so obviously desire to be.
Indeed, the extent to which Capitol security forces have repeatedly failed to use lethal force when the government was under threat arguably is an important causal element in what appears to be a decades-long trend of increasing violence at the Capitol and WH.
What I'm saying is that a whiff of grapeshot is an important part of a just and civil society.
look, women being able to vote is barely a century old, and since women might socialize more than men, it's really not to much to ask, for the sake of public health, that we suspend women's suffrage
your great-grandma didn't need to vote, why do you?
also to be clear mandatory schooling is much more than a century old in many states
non-white people have been infected by covid at higher rates; they are clearly a problem population; civil rights for non-whites are not even a century old, so why not suspend them for a few months while we get things under control?
ah but see my take is: racing horses for entertainment is fine because the net economic value is extremely high, but imprisoning animals in your house for fun is bad.
if the economic value to society of a practice is sufficiently high, some amount of discomfort for animals is justifiable. discomforting a small number of horses so that millions of people can enjoy their racing is a fair tradeoff!
imprisoning an animal for life so that 2 or 3 or 4 people can enjoy oo-ing at it for 2 hours a day is, however, not great.
similarly, zoos are fine; everybody keeping a tiger in the backyard is not so fine.
Hard disagree. It is now possible to adopt many of the life rhythms and social forms of "homestead" life without being a subsistence farmer by doing remote work. This isn't LARPing, it's a genuinely new form inspired by a historically-rooted ideal.
The family with four kids where the wife has an Etsy shop of craft goods and runs the local homeschool co-op and the husband is working as a freelancer online needn't do backbreaking labor to nonetheless be free of employer relations, socially largely autonomous, etc
The historic farmer wasn't perfectly economically autonomous either; truly autarkic living is vanishingly rare in human demographic history.
But there's no reason to treat these new "homesteaders" as LARPers or hypocrites.
If your data doesn't cross the zero axis it should be within a single color. A color change, such as from blue to green to yellow, should always indicate a *categorical* difference, not a difference of degree on a single scale.
I know my views on this are radical and at odds with standard data viz rules, but it's honestly nuts to me people think it's okay to use different colors along one scale, even if they're evenly metered!