Does the federal government still have the DVRs used in the White House on 1/6 in their possession?

If not, why not? That's obstruction of justice/evidence tampering.

But if so, what were the channels and timestamps the videos that TFG gleefully rewound and rewatched?
Ahem.

Might not even need the actual devices - just a subpoena to TiVO. 😈
explore.tivo.com/content/tivo/e…
and - for context:

theweek.com/donald-trump/1…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with random facts girl

random facts girl Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @soychicka

28 Dec 21
Looks like Madison Cawthorn's 'random trip' to Russia was part of a cruise itinerary aboard Royal Caribbean's Brilliance of the Seas.

Or they exactly duplicated the itinerary and found another ship with an Izumi on board leaving RU 6/15...

So, no. Not spur of the moment.
the timings: hover over the "184w" to get the dates.

instagram.com/stories/highli…
Read 4 tweets
24 Dec 21
Huh. How useful this HD capitol tunnel footage would have been for those of us running facerec 10 months ago….
Note : doorway face mask grabber guy first comes up the stairs at 40:40 from the left stairwell with a nonstandard trump flag
Is clearly filming as he walks towards the tunnel ~ 41:10
Read 5 tweets
16 Dec 21
Interestingly, it only refers to JE's estate, never to the decedent or anything else indicating Epstein is, in fact, deceased.

this is far out, but I'm curious -would waiving sec 1542 + no mention of death be grounds to prevent addl actions if his 'death' was exfiltration?
IOW, since they only reference the estate, not the decedent - if he was actually whisked away by Barr &| Mossad and surfaces in 10 years, would this safely serve to indemnify all his powerful 'clients' in perpetuity
...in a way that victims would not have agreed to if they were aware he was not deceased (if that were indeed the case), as the potential for his harm to others would not have come to a fixed end as they believed?
Read 10 tweets
12 Dec 21
What we really need: legislation to permit any citizen to force those who they have reason to believe engaged in facilitating sexual predation into court.

Allowing others to file suit relieves survivors of the initial burden.

Seeing testimony can bring survivors together...
When there is more than one survivor, it's more likely that actual criminal charges can be successfully prosecuted...

And it isn't just restricted to sexual predators themselves - anyone who helps facilitate or conceal sexual predation is fair game.
Bonus: if multiple individuals who have been covering for serial predators perjure themselves... that lays a pretty solid foundation for RICO.
Read 5 tweets
2 Dec 21
If SCOTUS decides to 'remain neutral' on abortion rights, they're effectively saying fetuses have no inherent constitutional 'right to life' per the USC.

That means any attempt to outlaw it as such would then be an unconsititutional violations of fully living womens' rights.
The thing is, you can't just willy-nilly restrict the rights of one person - unless you're doing it to ensure someone else's liberty is not impeded.

The only limit to our own liberty exists when it negatively impacts another's liberty.
If SCOTUS "neutrally" deems non-viable fetuses are not guaranteed the same rights & freedoms that a fully realized human adult possesses under the constitution in ALL states,

there can be NO constitutional path to limit the rights of pregnant women to terminate that pregnancy.
Read 10 tweets
6 Nov 21
The reason the FEC "dropped the ball" for several years?

Because there Was. Not. A. Quorum.
There literally were not enough commissioners to even vote on ANYTHING until May 2020 - because Trump nominated no one.

And the commission was only filled out at the END of his term.
Leaving those seats open ensured that no action would be possible, and that, by stacking the deck at the end of the administration, things could get pushed out past the SOL.

However, I propose that, indeed, the multi-year lack of a quorum is something that should TOLL SOL.
If there are not enough commissioners to make a decision - any decision - it is impossible for a crime to be "discovered" - and statute of limitations explicitly does not start ticking until the crime is discovered.

If there is no ability to prosecute, SOL can NOT expire.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(