@MntyP1@knigotnik@systemanalysen They can't explain it. But it's quite easy. The excess is dominated by 85+. Those are fragile people, and having had 2 years lockdowns and panic is not healthy. In Sweden this group is doing fine, as living a social life as mammals are supposed to live. See here.
@MntyP1@knigotnik@systemanalysen Both SWE and NL have vaxx levels of 95% in this group. It's irrelevant for the excess. No vaxx can make a damage at this level like NL. It's the lockdown, fear and isolation. Prisoners don't live long. If we continue, we can probably reduce life expectancy by 10 years.
@MntyP1@knigotnik@systemanalysen This excess is also in the 75-84 cohort in NL. Also 93% vaxxed in both countries. Nothing in SWE. It's the lockdown. Isolation and fear is unhealthy for social mammal life. Destroys resilience. I bet it's all cardiovascular and respiratory. @rubenivangaalen@KoudijsHenk
Have we not heard that old people often die when they loose their partner? Why is this the case?
We are not designed to live in fear, anxiety and isolation. Add low vitamin D levels, lack of sports, lack of healthy food and missed treatments.
@MntyP1@knigotnik@systemanalysen@rubenivangaalen@KoudijsHenk This excess is BTW also seen in all neighbouring countries of Sweden. Only Sweden is doing fine. Only Sweden didn't implement tyranny. That's the underlying root cause.
Shame on the Netherlands! For what they did to old, young and their society as a whole.
@MntyP1@knigotnik@systemanalysen@rubenivangaalen@KoudijsHenk What's even further appoling is the behavior of @statistiekcbs. They push the Simpson's confounding story using all age averages of vaccination levels and all age excess to claim too low vaccination as root cause. How wrong. E.g. here:
DNK: 99% and they have 85+ excess.
SWE: >93% and they have 85+ under mortality.
FI: >95% and they have 85+ excess.
NL: >93% and they GIANT excess in 85+
London is glowing today. Wide urban heat plume. Not “climate change.” Just real estate and concrete. The effect is visible. Quantifiable. Known. This should be a good study day to quantify UHI in more detail once the IR satellite pictures come in.
2/ We start low tech. Actually nothing more is needed. There is over 6°C urban heat. It's embarrassing to pretend today's 33°C are comparable to 100 years ago. Subtract 6–8°C for UHI and you get... 25–27°C. Welcome back to reality.
3/ Nighttime, Tmin. Watch how they flatten the colors. You’re not supposed to notice the 7°C UHI. We unflatten the colors. Look again: you see it now?
We can also do from SE raw. And we can also show how rural stations look. Frederik does like them. Climate agenda is measured in downtowns of the capitals?
Not sure if it’s normal that amateurs now have to lecture academics…?
The downtown station logs hourly=no need for even Ekholm, no need for re-sampling. Does Frederik even know what we mean? Nothing is adjusted. Also PHA leaves it as is as it only detects breakpoints (not UHI).
Yes. Hausfather & Berkeley Earth are pushing it.
But it’s not a measurement. Not one station shows that.
It’s what you get when you aggregate rot over time.
On the left: 8 pristine USCRN sites. Same y-scale.
Now look what they did.👇
2/ Was wir hier sehen: Die Datenreihe ist ein Komposit (sehr beliebt, wenig seroes, in der Klima-„Wissenschaft“).
Die Messmethode (und mehr) hat sich verändert – von analogen zu digitalen Sensoren. Die Entropie der Nachkommastellen zeigt das – deutlich.
1/ The result is simply wrong.
There are 2 stations there — we can compare.
🟥Red: Carlwood
🟩Green: Gatewick
We clearly see the overshoot.
Moreover: They’re using subhourly spikes (error) from a single, low-inertia sensor.
Total incompetence.
2/ Using TMAX from a low-quality single urban sensor is already peak incompetence.
But they go further — they take the spikes.
Even top-tier stations like USCRN show 2–3°C error at peak forcing.
USCRN uses triple sensors — worst spikes get voted out.
3/ The UK has nothing like the USCRN triple-sensor setup.
So when two nearby stations disagree, the right move is simple:
Discard the implausible one — in this case, Charlwood.
What does the agenda-captured @metoffice do?
They run with the error.
They hoax the public.
ISO9001🤡
Not a high-quality reference site like
Valentia Observatory (Ireland) or h-USCRN sites.
But: Lower urban bias than cities like Kyoto or Tokyo. It starts to show the well known flatliner we see at stable sites.
3/ To see it better, here’s 4 months side by side:
🟥 Kyoto
⬛️ Tokyo
🟦 Suttsu
This is man-made. The T trend is just unrelated to climate. It measures the site and environment change. Suttsu as expected least impacted. But it still is.