Most importantly, @BerniceKing of @TheKingCenter has said they're misusing her father, Dr. King, to make money. Honestly that alone should have our local leaders publicly making statements honoring their wishes, and saying our community does not support this event.
Secondly, the founder and spokesperson of M4L has been actively, openly, and publicly seeking media attention for their efforts to get "CRT" books out of the elementary classrooms - including, as we all know by now, one on MLK, Jr. and Ruby Bridges.
To classify that as anything but attempting to whitewash history for our children is impossible, although some are twisting themselves into knots trying to do so.
When your group makes statements like this about addressing the factually-proven reality that children of color are treated differently in our schools, you do not represent our community who believes it's not an acceptable reality in 2022.
When you have to make repeated statements about how your words and actions are being misinterpreted, most people would take a step back and take a hard look at what they're doing. But not here - they always just double down.
When you allow and encourage accusations that our schools are indoctrinating children - that *teachers* are somehow in on this plan to brainwash kids - you do not represent the ideals of our community.
When you continuously invoke the late Dr. King's name for your work in banning children from learning about his life, saying it's not "age appropriate" and makes your children feel bad about themselves, everyone sees through it.
While we could keep on going with this for days, it all comes back to this: Disrespecting what the caretaker of her family's legacy asks is flat out wrong. Saying MLK, Jr. is "CRT" and then invoking his image to raise money is shameful.
Get his name out of your mouths.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
1/ One of the first tests of the new Tennessee state laws about CRT in public schools was decided by the courts this month, and the litigants, Moms for Liberty-remoras James and Trish Lucente, failed bigly.
2/ The lawsuit alleged the Wit & Wisdom elementary reading curriculum contained CRT and age-inappropriate material, and was dismissed.
3/ Reminder: The Lucentes and their Parents Choice TN group were allegedly the ones who organized the mass trespass on WCS elementary school grounds in December 2021: williamsonherald.com/features/educa…
Now up: Superintendent Golden's report....
thanks those who spoke at public comment. Had detailed discussion at work session about Epic app and curriculum content, encourages everyone to go listen to those discussions (it's available on the WCS board page.)
The @WCSedu board is now discussing the elementary curriculum review committee findings. Buckle up and refill those beverages.
Cleveland (D7) says parents are the mentors & teachers and kids look to them while teaching them to respect those who have different beliefs than they do. WCS teachers are experienced professionals. Disappointed in our community who have lost faith that our teachers....
...can't teach these matters. "I have listened." Someone will find something wrong with any state-mandated curriculum. There will always be something someone doesn't like, and we have a process that was followed.
The @WCSedu is now discussing a resolution in opposition to HB2833 re: #charter schools, which would shorten the timeline for approval and allows charters to use district facilities:
The #wcsb is asking with this resolution for local control. Sheila Cleveland who chairs the legislative committee on the Board, says this is on the TSBA "oppose" list which means the state board does *not* recommend this for Tennessee public school districts.
...notes it would allow charter schools to bypass local approval and go straight to the state for approval (and we know how @GovBillLee feels about sending public school taxpayer money to private charter schools.)