That 2 of the US's largest social media giants actively censored reporting about the Biden family based on genuine documents 3 weeks before the election is one of the most alarming cases in years, but most media outlets *supported* the censorship because it helped Biden. If not:
But the most overlooked component of this scandal the media role. They all enabled this censorship by spreading and ratifying the outright lie from CIA and other intel officials that these docs were "Russian disinformation."
Once that was disproven, they never acknowledged it.
To this day, you can go to most major outlets -- NBC News, NYT, CNN, Atlantic, almost all of them -- and find the CIA lie that the Biden docs were Russian disinformation. Even once a book by a POLITICO reporter proved they were real, those outlets ignored that and left that lie.
This episode shows how these corporate outlets work. All their editors know about @SchreckReports's book confirming the docs' authenticity. But since the only two constituencies they care about ignored it - other outlets and liberals on Twitter - there was no need to retract it.
All editors and reporters at these "prestige" outlets know they spread a CIA-concocted lie right before the election. They know there is dispositive proof the docs are real. But they never mentioned the book or retracted because it's a pact of silence.
Wanting the state to silence one's adversaries is pervasive across time and culture -- that's why the 1st Am banned it -- but until recently, people were embarrassed to explicitly advocate it.
But in US liberal culture, censorship is now so normalized that this is no longer odd:
That's all independent of the legal inanities in Apatow's demand as it pertains to the FCC's powers and the like. That's just standard ignorance.
Most notable is how common it is among Dems to crave a union of state and corporate power brute censor one's political adversaries.
Again: it is bizarre -- surreal -- that the people who have convinced themselves they are fighting fascism in the US vehemently demand a union of state and corporate power to silence their enemies.
A fanatic, by definition, believes all their tactics are inherently just.
Really enjoyed this 20-minute discussion with @krystalball and @esaagar on the one-year anniversary of 1/6 and how it is exploited and for what purposes.
Platforms that allow in-depth discussion, reach large audiences and remain independent are crucial.
(By the way: since Breaking Points is a program on which I often appear, and frequently appeared on their prior program, is it safe and fair to assume that I share all of the ideological views of its hosts and am responsible for all their pronouncements whether I'm there or not?)
Speaking of platforms enabling very large audiences to be reached while remaining independent: the views for our Rumble video reports, after just 3 months, are very high and rapidly growing. It's true of Rumble as a whole, hence the wave of media attacks on it as it grows more.
The CIA
The FBI
Big Tech Censorship
David Frum
Bill Kristol
Liz Cheney
Bush/Cheney spokesperson Nicolle Wallace
Neocons generally (Max Boot & Jen Rubin)
The Lincoln Project Scumbags
DOJ Prosecutors
NSA operatives
They did the same thing during the entire Trump presidency, only then it was all about Russia and the Kremlin and how Trump was being controlled by Putin through clandestine blackmail (remember all that? lol).
If you have no governing program, fear is the only thing to use.
It happens all around the world. A party in power that feels it can't persuade voters to support them and win elections based on policy instead tries to convert their opposition into criminals rather than adversaries, and then censor and prosecute them in lieu of winning.
The #TreasonSummit when Trump went to Helsinki may have been the single dumbest thing I've ever seen in politics: huge numbers of Dems in media and politics working themselves up into a hysterical frenzy, led by their former CIA Director, now at NBC News:
Australian officials have been flamboyantly insisting they will bar tennis players from their country unless they are vaccinated or have a medical excuse.
Magically, the steadfastly unvaccinated Novak Djokovic - one of the planet's fittest athletes - qualifies for an exemption!
Several unvaccinated players who aren't as valuable economically to Australia and the Australian Open as Djokovic were forced to withdraw from the tournament.
What great luck that the world #1 has some grave medical condition as he wins Grand Slams!
It's almost like these rules are bullshit theater unrelated to the public health and therefore can be manipulated or ignored whenever it suits one with money or power: like the team of masked servants AOC had as she was groomed, unmasked, for the Met Gala