Our MDs and NPs are on call for one week at a time.
Between 5pm-8am weekdays and all weekend,
we need to be ready to
support patients for
URGENT, not emergency issues
that cannot wait until the next business day
that means phone close by at all times
People call appropriately for:
e.g. sick baby with fever, to figure out does she need to go to emergency or can stay home
or
e.g. strained back shoveling snow and want to know what can do to alleviate pain
I can bill a "telehealth visit: 14x37"
~32$ for call + documentation
Sometimes people call hoping for:
✖️an appointment the next day, or
✖️something in their chart or
✖️renew a medication that is coming due in the next few weeks.
This is not what the service is for & this kind of request is why we have our fabulous admin staff.
I ask people to leave a voicemail with their name, contact and brief description of their issue.
I get to my computer, open up their chart and get a bit of background info about who they are, before I call them.
Emergencies should be calling 911, not me!
After I speak to the person & give advice
I write a detailed note
often with a direct message back to their usual MD
I might also need to print a prescription
find the pharmacy fax number
fax a prescription to the pharmacy &
make sure it gets there
Each call takes me ~30-60 min
I usually get 1-6 calls per day, a total of ~20 in a week.
This week is much busier
People are frantic, burnt out from the pandemic. Unsure about how to handle return to school, "typical cold symptoms", etc.
Myself,
I find the anticipation
of being called at any time
very taxing
while I only have to do it 3-5 weeks a year,
it adds a significant layer of stress to my work.
I wish that we could plan for those weeks and reduce or stop all other work, but that is not feasible
In our current #BCPrimaryCare setup,
we are all working flat out
doing the patient visits, virtual and in person
then we add on:
-pandemic response
-IT support
-HR/Lease mgt of office space and employees
-staying up to date on medical treatments
-being peer-reviewed by @CPSBC
Ideally, we would be able to describe all the necessary work to plan, deliver and improve #BCPrimaryCare, hire the best-qualified people, and ensure everyone has a sustainable, healthy work environment.
This would require clinic-based funding (instead of paying for everything via paid to MD fees).
Like how a school gets funds for its building, and operations and then based on the community needs, the teachers and support staff are hired.
The lack of this infrastructure is one reason for the persistent "family doctor shortage".
Imagine we graduated new teachers
& said, please go organize yourself
with other teachers
& start a school.
We will pay you per lesson delivered/child.
I'm glad to speak to the patients
& when possible reassure them,
or avoid a trip to Emerg.
But I am not sure this model of care is sustainable, healthcare workers are getting BURNT OUT.
Real rest and breaks,
v. layering on more work is needed.
A 🧵 to explain
why we need a whole
new math equation
to actually
fix the problem of
equitable access to
🇨🇦primary care
1/
We only need 4400 family doctors...
2/
We have a shortage
because
the assumptions
of the math equation
are... wrong.
❤️🩹Not every patient has the same primary care needs
❤️🩹Not every family doctor provides community-based longitudinal care
❤️🩹Not every doctor can work 5 days/week, 52 weeks/year, forever
3/
What can you do to keep yourself as healthy as possible if you don't have a family doctor?
A🧵of (unofficial) ideas for "the unattached" 1/11
2/ ❤️🩹🩺
First, let's get this important caveat out of the way...
If you are VERY SICK
e.g. issues breathing
or chest pain
or you're bleeding excessively
or another urgent/emergency condition
GO TO THE CLOSEST EMERGENCY ROOM or CALL 911
3/ 🩺❤️🩹
2nd crucial caveat
If over the last 3-6 mon you
-had unintended weight loss >10lbs
-have drenching night sweats (& aren't experiencing menopause)
-blood in your stool/urine
-have a breast lump
Get seen by an MD < ~2 weeks, & tell them these things (in person>>virtual)
3/5 200 participants (FPs, NPs, Nurses, and community members) attended an educational webinar focused on opioid sparing practices and the (lack of) evidence for opioid analgesics to treat noncancer pain.
You can read more here: doi.org/10.1093/fampra… (3/5)
The REDONNA study doi.org/10.1016/j.cct.…
began from the motivation for improved & safer opioid prescribing in primary care
We aimed to educate MDs about their OWN prescribing practices using audit & feedback letters developed by the @Drug_Evidence@JanKlimas@ShawnaNarayan 1/4
They received information about the number of new opioid initiations & how they compared to the average physician. They were provided information on the (lack) of effectiveness on pain for opioid naïve patients through an educational webinar: doi.org/10.1093/fampra… (2/3)
From this study, we hope to support the uptake of quality prescribing practices that are equity-oriented and evidence-based to help patients experience less pain. (3/4)