They're is this really strange tendency in US public policy, politics, and specifically media to take issues that people can actually kind of agree about and push absurdist solutions and ideas. Take the trans athlete in women's sports issue. I don't have a dog in this fight 1/n
And quite frankly I've yet to meet anyone who really cares. However, media like NBC has taken to pushing absolutely absurdist disinformation (had to drop that in) that there is no scientific evidence men have an advantage over women in athletic competition. Rather than taking 2/n
An issue where reasonable moderate solutions exist and could be much more easily agreed to, they put forth absurdist claims at the extreme to inflame viewers. Probably more importantly they ignore women's rights in this case. If I was a female swimmer in the widely discussed 3/n
Case yes I would be pissed. I remember how absurd it was during the summer Olympics when women with testosterone advice a certain level were banned but trans women with testosterone levels well above levels for banned women were allowed to compete. It makes absolute no sense 4/n
The bigger problem is instead of approaching the issue conservatively (not meant politically) in how can we reach a reasonable solution for all shareholders, they actually advocate for extreme positions and push absurdist idea to paint any one who disagrees as all nature of 5/n
Of backwards neanderthal -ist. If you notice they even appeal to science even though the science is clearly against them and scientists have written on this very topic detailing biophysiology. Media needs to do a much better job if it wants respect rather than inflaming

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Xinhua Man of the Year Balding 大老板

Xinhua Man of the Year Balding 大老板 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @BaldingsWorld

1 Jan
Rambling thread warning. My one public New Years Resolution is to not be mean to Journos and Galaxy Brains. Make no mistake journalism all around from the right to the left is deeply flawed and they refuse to acknowledge the problems or address them in anyway. Make no mistake 1/n
Universities and professors for all their virtue signalling and preening moral superiority are deeply corrupt with regards to places like China. All of these places and people remain stunningly unaware or unwilling to take tangible concrete steps address these threats 2/n
And definitely not anything that impacts their business. All that said and very true, I resolve to change my tone in this forum about these institutions and individuals though they all remain deeply problematic and hypocritical 3/n
Read 12 tweets
22 Dec 21
Due to the fact I am not working in academia and that academics are spouting such absolute self serving gibberish about the Lieber China case let's review the key points and lay ruin to the bull dung being slung. First, Lieber was not charged with "espionage" and the case 1/n
Was about lying on income taxes, concealing foreign assets, and lying about foreign contacts on official documents. So when you read an academic say things like "The US government hasn't proven he was a spy" they might as well be saying "The government hasn't proven he 2/n
was a purple dinosaur" because the case had nothing to do with proving espionage any more than it had to do with purple dinosaurs. Second, there is no espionage here because to the best of my knowledge Lieber never had or conducted research requiring security clearance. 3/n
Read 17 tweets
20 Dec 21
People wonder why I am so critical of universities, professors, and similar Galaxy Brains when it comes to China and there are a couple of reasons. Let me explain. First, these people are the height of hypocrisy. The same people and institutions who will criticize 1/n
Everyone and everything absolutely will not do the same on China. Saudi Arabia? Israel? The Military? The GOP? All awful. The PLA and the CCP? Shrug what are you going to do, let's work with those guys. Second, they demand of others what they refuse to demand of themselves. 2/n
Look at how much they criticize companies, countries, politicians, and political parties for working with China. Then look at the universities that turn over management of their campus in China to a CCP selected leader and member. Then look at the CCP princeling sitting 3/n
Read 11 tweets
11 Dec 21
A fundamental of a color blind society is whether two individuals or groups of different racial or ethnic background are treated in similar ways before the law and in society. As some are so lightly throwing around charges if racism around any thing looking critically at 1/n
China's involvement in key US institutions let's take the MIT example and use an existing comparison to see if charges if racism stand up. For many years, Russian individuals and institutions have been involved with MIT and Boston technology firms. In the second Obama 2/n
Adminstration (not blaming at all only for dating purposes) MIT and Boston had numerous notable involvement with Russians from a notable kleptocrat stepping down from the MIT board of trustees to the FBI very publicly taking about Russian attempts to purchase sensitive 3/n
Read 9 tweets
9 Dec 21
The Foreign Affairs piece on Xi's New World Order: Can China Remake the International System? is finally moving in the right direction but Galaxy Brains have a long long way to fully grasp the problem and understand how to respond to it. Follow me a second 1/n
The piece lays out very realistically how China is changing the world for the worse if you believe in democratic liberalism. There are three problems with the piece. First, China already has REMADE the international system. That is fait accompli. The piece does not go far 2/n
Enough recognizing how cooked the frog is. The UN, WHO, WTO, on and on are under effective Chinese control and this was the result of work that started decades ago, not a year or two ago. Second, this same exact piece could have been written two years ago and except updating 3/n
Read 12 tweets
5 Dec 21
This is the original WaPo trash piece about whether Biden gets more negative coverage than Trump. Let me explain why it is trash and warn you now this has near zero to do with anything partisan so just warning you now 1/n
washingtonpost.com/opinions/2021/…
Sentiment analysis is a run of the mill tool, and there are different flavors out there, that seems to classify a language dataset as more positive or negative. The WaPo article doesn't specify which one they used but I'll assume it's one of the standard ones and no funny biz 2/n
It sounds complicated but what it does, (oversimplifying here), is count up positive and negative words and then calculate whether the article was more positive or negative. Different flavors can tweak the calculation in different ways that are pretty accepted but pretty 3/n
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(