Minnesota’s #COVID19 data is still messy and backlogged, and hard to interpret. Today’s 10K newly reported cases would be the most ever reported on a Monday — but a lot of these cases are older than usual due to a backlog.
More than 5,500 of today’s 10K cases were from tests conducted a week ago or older.
So far the most recent days for which we have non-negligible case counts (last Wednesday & Thursday) have relatively low positivity rates. But this might just reflect a lag in processing cases.
So if you include the incomplete data from Wednesday & Thursday in the data, it looks like Minnesota’s positivity rate has peaked and is dropping.
But it’s WAY too early to conclude that with lots of cases not yet reported.
#COVID19 hospital admissions are rising for non-ICU beds, and falling for ICU beds.
The difference could just reflect different lag times between infection and when people deteriorate to the point of needing regular vs. ICU beds.
#COVID19 deaths are rising again, though it’s just for a couple of days so far, and too early to say whether this is a trend or a blip.
If you’re not a resident of an assisted-living facility, this is the deadliest part of Minnesota’s #COVID19 outbreak to date.
For basically the first time, Minnesotans under 65 are accounting for a larger share of reported #COVID19 deaths than people over 80.
New breakthrough data as of early December now. Unvaccinated Minnesotans then were nearly 14 times more likely to be hospitalized with #COVID19 and 16 times more likely to die from it than the unvaccinated.
Both those figures are increasing, not decreasing.
A little uptick in MN’s booster pace. Unclear whether that’s a blip or a durable change.
Rates of new first doses have inched up a little, but remain very slow.
Overall, 72% of Minnesotans have at least one dose, 66% are fully vaccinated and 32.5% are boosted.
For adults 18+, it’s 83%, 77% and 42%.
The share of newly reported cases in Minnesota that are reinfections continues to rise.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
“No principles, any methods, but no flowery language — always Yes or No, though you could only count on him if it was No.” — Clement Attlee on Stalin
“Soviet biologists were instructed to adopt the theories of the charlatan Lysenko… to disastrous effect… It is significant that Stalin left his nuclear physicists alone & never presumed to second guess *their* calculations. Stalin may well have been mad, but he was not stupid.”
“Fortunately for the West, American popular culture had an appeal that American political ineptitude could do little to tarnish.”
I finally hit on why "Hazbin Hotel" is leaving me so cold. I love a stylized sitcom about depraved souls in the afterlife struggling toward redemption: It's called "The Good Place," & while it lacked raunch, songs & art deco animation, it had sophisticated multi-layered writing.
Partly this is a difference in execution — if you hired Michael Schur to script-doctor the dialogue on "Hazbin Hotel" you'd get a much better show — but in large part it's just intent. TGP was aiming at the border between middle- and high-brow; HH is aiming at middle-low.
I see everything "Hazbin Hotel" is trying to do, and can appreciate it in an abstract sense. It's not a terrible show, it's just, like, a C+. It's competently done and has a few interesting ideas, but (4-5 episodes in) doesn't display any real verve or finesse in its writing.
You BET we polled people about #Napoleon. On the eve of a new biopic, most Americans don't know very much about Bonaparte, and what they do know, they don't especially like.
The U.S. actually has the highest rates of considering Napoleon's legacy to be "negative" of any of 8 countries YouGov polled. That includes several other countries that Napoleon actually invaded, humiliated and occupied.
What DO Americans know — or think they know — about Napoleon? Well, I regret to inform you that one of the most popular descriptors was "short," with no real difference between people who said they knew a fair bit about Napoleon and those who didn't.
cc @WaltHickey @pbump @PatrickRuffini @goodreads @DanielBGreene @aedwardslevy @NateSilver538
How many books do people own, anyway? My @YouGovAmerica survey found most people own at least SOME physical books, but most of these collections are pretty small. 20% of Americans own between 1 & 10 books.
NEW: Full-time caregiving is the #1 reason prime-age Americans don't work. In my latest for the @MinneapolisFed, I break down the stats behind this key demographic group:
Among adults age 25-54, women are 90% of full-time caregivers. But that's down from 96% two decades ago, while the share of full-time caregivers who are men has doubled.
Social conventions, health and individual preferences all impact parents' choices when one of them is going to stay home. But sometimes finances drive the decision, and in opposite-sex prime-age couples, men are twice as likely to be the top earner:
When the @Suntimes ran an undercover bar to catch sleazy officials: "I think one of the things that amazed us is that these inspectors sold out public safety on the cheap. They were not taking huge amounts. We were told to leave $10 for one inspector & $25 for another inspector."
@Suntimes @kottke Also: "[Columnists] smiled & gave me a thumbs-up. And I thought, ‘Well, that’s nice! They liked it!’ And it made me feel good. I was later told they gave me a thumbs-up b/c I got the word ‘ass’ in the paper. They’d been trying to get the word ‘ass’ past the copy desk for years."