I can't believe I need to say this, but... no.

(a thread.)
Every time someone makes an argument that the West should give Russia a taste of its own medicine, 100 government-paid trolls and thousands more individuals who are happy to amplify Kremlin rhetoric file that sentiment away in their "whataboutist" files. (/2)
This paragraph conflates the difference between strategic communications based in fact—ie truthful reporting on Russian missteps in foreign wars past and present—and the false and misleading narratives that have primarily been the terrain of authoritarians, not democrats.
One of the main points in HOW TO LOSE THE INFORMATION WAR is that we shouldn't stoop to Russia and other adversaries' levels in the information space. We've lost a lot of moral standing in the past several years. We shouldn't willingly cede what's left. (/4)
I admit the US *has* played this game in the past, and that's to the detriment of our credibility today. If we want to offer a glimpse at an alternative—a version of which dissidents around the world can strive for—we can't continue doing it now or in the future. (/5)
We've already seen these tactics employed among politicians and endorsed by political parties domestically. Right now it's the worst of what we have to offer, and exporting that won't win us any friends or supporters abroad. (/6)
Take, for instance, recent programs in which USG entities texted Russians and Iranians for info on influence ops. The effort was ridiculed by officials and ordinary citizens alike as being out of touch (not to mention dangerous)... (/7)(nytimes.com/2020/08/06/us/…)
...and that's a lot more innocuous than a *literal campaign of lies* that would be sure to be even more bumbling and embarassing than some of the worst of the Internet Research Agency's dank memes. Lest we forget, this came out of DOD not long ago 😬 military.com/daily-news/202… (/8)
As you can see, I've answered far too many whataboutist questions from Putin supporters over the years, and I'd really prefer not to give them further ammunition. Sadly, there are more pieces where this one came from that argue for the very same antidemocratic tactics.(/9)
They should never be on our menu of responses. (/end)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Nina Jankowicz

Nina Jankowicz Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @wiczipedia

10 Jan
Well, I’m up far too early, so I may as well tweet about the US-Russia discussions happening in #Geneva today.

I’ve been reluctant to comment too much on the growing tensions; I’m wary of allowing Russia to set the narrative and that’s what we’ve been seeing so far.
Russia is the party creating this escalation; Russia instigated the war in Ukraine in the first place; Russia alone can stop it.

Any discussion of the talks without mentioning those facts, but underlining Russia’s “demands” or supposed reasoning for the troop buildup…
on Ukraine’s border is allowing Russia to set the narrative. End of story.

That’s why I’ve been glad to see US officials firmly reject Moscow’s demands for security guarantees regarding Ukraine’s NATO membership and US forces in Central Europe.
Read 5 tweets
25 Oct 21
"Zuckerberg testified last year before Congress that the company removes 94 percent of the hate speech it finds. But in internal documents, researchers estimated that the company was removing less than 5 percent of all hate speech on Facebook." washingtonpost.com/technology/202…
This is a key point that researchers have been underlining for years. Facebook is often touting that it removes huge amounts of hate speech *that it finds*, but has never publicly admitted that there is a large universe of posts that never cross moderators' screens.
This is a key point in #MalignCreativity, the study I led @TheWilsonCenter around gendered abuse in the 2020 election. Because abusers are good at adapting to platform rules to avoid detection, their violative posts are often not found by platform systems. wilsoncenter.org/publication/ma…
Read 4 tweets
22 Oct 21
Important reporting from @BrandyZadrozny.

Critically, as she notes, many researchers were confirming and re-confirming the danger of Group recommendations for years before Facebook took action.

So much wasted time.
Last year, I wrote for @TheAtlantic about my own experience covering a local re-open movement and how my decade-plus of engagement patterns were upended seemingly overnight.

theatlantic.com/technology/arc…
Together @CindyOtis_ and I described the problem in a @WIRED op Ed that only skimmed the surface of the disturbing things we had found. June 2020. wired.com/story/facebook…
Read 6 tweets
22 Oct 21
On Russian interference in 2016, a FB comms official said:

“It will be a flash in the pan. Some legislators will get pissy. And then in a few weeks they will move onto something else. Meanwhile we are printing money in the basement, and we are fine.”

washingtonpost.com/technology/202…
"Facebook’s Public Policy team...defended a “white list” that exempted Trump-aligned Breitbart News, run then by former White House strategist Stephen K. Bannon, and other select publishers from Facebook’s ordinary rules against spreading false news reports."
"The whistleblower...said such Groups have become havens for criminality, facilitating illegal trade in drugs and antiquities. When the whistleblower raised concerns about this within the company, a Facebook official replied, “We need to focus on the good,” the affidavit says."
Read 6 tweets
18 Oct 21
On the death of Colin Powell (a short thread):

One thing I have been perversely grateful for during the pandemic is that my father did not live to see it. He died of complications from Multiple Myeloma in 2011; this blood/bone marrow cancer wreaks havoc on the immune system.
Colin Powell also suffered from multiple myeloma. Any reporting that mentions Powell's COVID-19 vaccination status but not that his body was essentially unable to fight infections is not doing its due diligence.

Sending my condolences to his family.
(And yes, before you ask, several of the "biggest" news outlets in our country don't mention that he suffered from myeloma. It's appalling, fear-mongering, and endemic of the poor reporting and shallow discourse that has in part contributed to vaccine hesitancy in the US.)
Read 9 tweets
5 Oct 21
While the Commerce Committee is in recess, some reading for you. A few pieces I've written tracking these issues over the past four years. Some details in enforcement have change, but by and large, the conclusions still hold up, and that is frustrating. (1/)
On self-regulation and why it didn't work, for @PostOpinions:

washingtonpost.com/news/democracy…
On authoritarians' love for the social media platform, and Facebook's seeming inability to stand up to them, also for @PostOpinions: washingtonpost.com/news/democracy…
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(