.@EmilyThornberry on her reaction to the alleged May 2020 party: "Complete disbelief. But this falls into a pattern of their hiding the truth and then when things come out starting to lie about it and then spin about it and then hiding behind Sue Gray." #Newsnight
Thornberry: "Just four weeks ago the PM was saying...how furious he was that Downing St was that staff were making light of restrictions and how furious people would be that people setting the rules were not following them." #Newsnight
Thornberry: "A few weeks after this party Boris Johnson announced that because we'd all been following the rules...we are now able to meet one another in gardens. When all the time they had just been doing whatever they wanted because the rules don't apply to them."
Clear intensification from Labour on this. Thornberry repeatedly saying that the Prime Minister has lied to Parliament.
FYI of course we invited the government on the programme tonight. We were told no-one was available.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Lewis Goodall

Lewis Goodall Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @lewis_goodall

12 Jan
NEW: On a huge day for Boris Johnson things just got that bit worse.

High court rules govt’s use of “VIP lane” to award PPE contracts to two companies during pandemic first wave was unlawful.
Judge said “there is evidence that opportunities were treated as high priority even where there were no objectively justifiable grounds for expediting the offer.”
Case was brought by @GoodLawProject
Read 8 tweets
11 Jan
You’ll note that not only is the PM not in attendance but there are barely any Conservative MPs there either. Image
Labour MPs keep shouting “Wheres the Prime Minister?!”

Mr Speaker interrupts: “It’s obvious it’s not the Prime Minister. We don’t need to keep hearing the question. The minister already has the tough job as it is.”
Ellis: “if wrong-doing is found to have taken place then the requisite disciplinary action will be taken.”
Read 10 tweets
11 Jan
Talking to civil servants, quite a bit of dissatisfaction in Whitehall that, because of the evolution of events, a civil servant is now effectively being asked to sit in judgment on the Prime Minister and that that is an impossible position.
Ie the view I’m hearing is that even with someone with the formidable reputation as Sue Gray, she has now been placed in a deeply unfair and invidious situation.
It’s also pointed out that the PM could easily ameliorate this problem and remove himself from being in the investigation’s purview by simply explaining any involvement he had in that event now- ie not await SG’s conclusions. As also suggested by this former No 10 Chief of Staff
Read 6 tweets
10 Jan
So what did all that mean?

Big picture:

1) If I were an affected leaseholder I'd be more confident after today that I won't be footing the bill for fire safety works.
2) I'd be less confident about when I'll be able to finally move on, sell my flat and the process concludes.
3) And the rest of us can be almost clueless as to whether i) developers will actually pay ii) how much iii) when iv) what the process will be/how it will be calculated v) whether the taxpayer ultimately will have to step in
Because ultimately what Gove announced today was an important change of principle but little in the way of concrete detail as to how it will be achieved

Ie Gove announced leaseholders not on hook for anything, cladding or otherwise (mega important) but then...
Read 17 tweets
10 Jan
.@lisanandy quoting from our leaked letter and tension between what Michael Gove has said today and what HMT says in it: "He said we can increase taxation on those responsible but that isn't quite right is it? I have here a letter from the Chief Sec to the Treasury..."
"...if I've seen this letter then I'm fairly sure the developers have too...What he has told the public that tax rises are the backstop is not what he's told the Treasury...this letter says that you have confirmed that DLUHC are a backstop for funding the proposals in full..."
"...that is not what he told the House a few moments ago."

Asks him to clarify his plan and says that if he has to go back to the Treasury and legislate it could take months. Leaseholders need help now.
Read 6 tweets
10 Jan
Here we go- Michael Gove statement on building safety

“It’s clear the building safety system remains broken.”
Gove: "Leaseholders are shouldering a desperately unfair burden. They're blameless and it is morally wrong that they're being asked to pay the price...I'm clear who should pay the price, the industries involved."
Gove: "Those who knowingly put lives at risk should be held to account for their crimes...to those who are seeking to profit from the crisis should be stopped from doing so...today I'm putting them on notice. To those who cut corners to save cash...we are coming for you."
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(