You don't need elaborate psychological theories to explain coronavirus mania. You don't need much more than social media plus political tribalization to explain 80% of it. But if you want to go deeper, consider the dissonance between regular people and crisis addicts.
Most people want normal life to return, the crisis to be over. They're looking for an exit ramp. They do not like feeling helpless, so they will eagerly seize upon any proposal that appears to give them a tiny bit of power. They really want to trust lavishly-funded "experts."
Those impulses are largely rational, including the *desire* to trust expert opinions on complex and frightening issues. More people should understand how comprehensively inept our Leviathan State has become, but it's reasonable to *want* trillion-dollar agencies to function well.
A minority of people - much louder and more influential than their numbers would normally suggest, given the realities of our neurotic political culture and social media - are addicted to the crisis atmosphere in various ways and don't really want it to end.
For some, this desire is buried or private - in public they'll insist they want normalcy as much as anyone - but others are open about wishing to keep the crisis atmosphere rolling, and repurposing it to cover their other political interests, such as climate change.
Throw in the social media megaphone effect, the bitter tribalization of politics, and the tendency of bureaucrats to blame people who disobey their edicts for all bad outcomes, and you have a recipe for a collective national psyche that looks deranged and delusional.
Most of the individuals participating in that collective insanity are quite reasonable - IF they are approached as adults with the right and responsibility to make decisions based on the best possible information. Americans haven't been approached that way in decades.
Right now, we're paying a heavy price for the deliberate use of disinformation to stampede people into this or that behavior. People are confused and understandably distrust institutions that have repeatedly been either wrong on a gigantic scale, or deliberately dishonest.
But the masses aren't suffering from any psychosis. They have a reasonable desire to restore normal life. They're well aware of the horrendous price paid for following weird strategies that didn't work. They're angry that they still can't get straight answers to basic questions.
It's our leadership class - politicians, bureaucrats, "experts," media - that have acted like lunatics throughout this crisis, pulled in different directions by conflicting agendas, nursing tribal hatreds to gain power instead of acting rationally, efficiently, and honestly. /end
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Capitalism and self-government are inextricably linked. If the people don't control their property and labor, they have no autonomy that cannot be taken away from them by politicians.
To keep this link healthy, it is essential to build the highest wall between MONEY and POWER.
Of course money and power cannot be fully separated - it's terribly naïve to think so. But we should be aware that wealthy people are interested in buying political influence, and if they accumulate too much, they can damage that vital link between free markets and freedom.
There is a natural tendency in successful free markets for capital to centralize - and political power follows it to become dangerously centralized too. Prosperous endeavors grow, successful investors invest more, and consumers reap benefits from growing corporations.
A few months ago the mighty Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan was holding victory parades with all the military equipment that blithering idiot Joe Biden gave them. Now they're beggars that can't feed their own people. Beggar regimes should not be given a shred of legitimacy.
The civilized world needs to have a long, painful discussion about how massive humanitarian aid can sustain and empower evil regimes. Every dollar spent caring for the abused and ignored population by outsiders is a dollar the rulers can spend on weapons, terrorism, and luxuries.
If the 1/6 riots were an act of "terrorism" - using force to achieve political ends - then so were the BLM riots.
The difference is that the latter were successful - and their success was a bloody disaster for Americans, especially black Americans.
The grotesque spectacle Democrats and their media are putting on today is not a condemnation of "terrorism," or "insurrection," or "attacking elections." They aren't planning to say a single damn word about the very recent times THEY did all of those things.
This is all about crass political opportunism, and reinforcing the claim that left-wingers have a monopoly on "righteous" political violence. When lefties use violence on YOU, it's "mostly peaceful" and you should stop whining and walk it off - even when they kill people.
Doing away with public employee unions, including public school teacher unions, should be a top Republican agenda item. Stop being intimidated by the money and political connections of these unions. Take this to the court of public opinion with righteous energy and you'll win.
Public unions of any stripe are absurd and never should have been allowed for a single minute. Every Republican politician knows this, but they rarely take the case to the public, or attempt to translate the very reasonable case against these unions into legislation.
After the mad abuses of the pandemic, how can even the weakest-spined GOP legislator or candidate think the majority of voters isn't ready to hear a strong case for breaking up these unions? It's a gift-wrapped opportunity to take a bold step that would actually change things.
When the Republicans take Congress next year, they should get working on an Internet Bill of Rights, and one of its provisions should include jail time for corporate employees who abuse banning and censorship tools to commit acts of political repression.
Fines aren't enough. Mega-wealthy politicized Internet platforms would find ways to pay the fines for their employees. The cost would be acceptable compared to the political advantage gained. Make the censors think long and hard about how they, personally, are in legal jeopardy.
It's very unfortunate that we need an Internet Bill of Rights, but it's painfully clear that we do. It's the least intrusive response to politicized censorship. A company that inserts itself into our elections and manipulates the outcomes is no longer a fully "private" entity.
Late-stage pandemic response is hindered by how much the earlier stages were governed by panic, politics, and authoritarian urges. We'd be in better shape now if Americans had always been treated like rational adults capable of balancing cost and benefit, risk and reward.
Now, all of a sudden - solely and entirely because blue states where political and media elites live are experiencing huge Covid surges, and the incompetent Biden admin fell down on ordering test kits - we're talking about measuring the cost of restrictions against benefits.
Now that panic measures and authoritarian diktats have failed, and places where "sophisticated" people who "did everything right" are boiling over with new cases, suddenly it's time to ask if those protocols too harsh, if we should be counting hospitalizations instead of cases.