Capitalism and self-government are inextricably linked. If the people don't control their property and labor, they have no autonomy that cannot be taken away from them by politicians.

To keep this link healthy, it is essential to build the highest wall between MONEY and POWER.
Of course money and power cannot be fully separated - it's terribly naïve to think so. But we should be aware that wealthy people are interested in buying political influence, and if they accumulate too much, they can damage that vital link between free markets and freedom.
There is a natural tendency in successful free markets for capital to centralize - and political power follows it to become dangerously centralized too. Prosperous endeavors grow, successful investors invest more, and consumers reap benefits from growing corporations.
The problem is that as Big Business gets bigger, it develops more of an appetite for Big Government. This has become painfully obvious over the past generation, but it shouldn't be surprising. Corporate titans want to become political titans too. Politicians want their money.
The power of Big Government can be used for the benefit of Big Business, by imposing regulations that burden smaller competitors and "socializing" costs that large corporations would otherwise pay themselves. Let Gov and Biz grow large enough, and they inevitably fuse together.
Today we're seeing dire examples of the greatest danger lurking in that fusion: the erosion of individual freedom and autonomy that comes with placing corporate power at the disposal of politicians. Private sector "partners" can enforce political agendas in ways the State cannot.
The "Great Reset" we SHOULD be talking about right now is forcibly separating political and corporate power. Capitalism is a vital element of freedom that must be protected from politicians... and, sometimes, from capitalists. Big Biz and Big Gov must be separated.
You could describe this fusion of corporate and political power as corruption, but unfortunately too many anti-corruption "activists "cling to the fantasy of Clean Big Government, a dangerous faith that corruption can only be purged by making the State even MORE powerful.
That's the heart of the problem: there are no Clean Big Governments. Leviathan states are INHERENTLY corrupt. They just pass laws and speech codes that prevent anyone from calling out their corruption. They normalize it by rebranding it as policies and mandates.
There's really only one reliable way to minimize corruption, to prevent Big Biz and Big Gov from fornicating, to keep wealthy interest from buying power and ambitious politicians from selling it: the value of power must be reduced to bring down demand.
If politicians weren't such a good investment, special interests wouldn't spend so much money buying them. The rule of law is essential to preserving both economic and political freedom, which are twins joined forever by the nature of choice and consequence.
The rule of law demands honestly, clarity, and impartiality. You'll never get any of that while politicians view themselves as heavyweight players in the game they're supposed to be impartially overseeing. The endgame of capitalism must not be the acquisition of political power.
Politicians view capital as a club, a weapon they can use to coerce the population into "correct" thinking and behavior. Billionaires view political power as a form of super-capital only they can afford to buy. We urgently need to adjust the attitudes of both groups. /end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Hayward

John Hayward Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Doc_0

11 Jan
You don't need elaborate psychological theories to explain coronavirus mania. You don't need much more than social media plus political tribalization to explain 80% of it. But if you want to go deeper, consider the dissonance between regular people and crisis addicts.
Most people want normal life to return, the crisis to be over. They're looking for an exit ramp. They do not like feeling helpless, so they will eagerly seize upon any proposal that appears to give them a tiny bit of power. They really want to trust lavishly-funded "experts."
Those impulses are largely rational, including the *desire* to trust expert opinions on complex and frightening issues. More people should understand how comprehensively inept our Leviathan State has become, but it's reasonable to *want* trillion-dollar agencies to function well.
Read 10 tweets
7 Jan
Breaking: another dirtbag authoritarian regime takes its own people hostage and demands concessions to end their suffering
A few months ago the mighty Islamic Emirate of Afghanistan was holding victory parades with all the military equipment that blithering idiot Joe Biden gave them. Now they're beggars that can't feed their own people. Beggar regimes should not be given a shred of legitimacy.
The civilized world needs to have a long, painful discussion about how massive humanitarian aid can sustain and empower evil regimes. Every dollar spent caring for the abused and ignored population by outsiders is a dollar the rulers can spend on weapons, terrorism, and luxuries.
Read 10 tweets
6 Jan
If the 1/6 riots were an act of "terrorism" - using force to achieve political ends - then so were the BLM riots.

The difference is that the latter were successful - and their success was a bloody disaster for Americans, especially black Americans.
The grotesque spectacle Democrats and their media are putting on today is not a condemnation of "terrorism," or "insurrection," or "attacking elections." They aren't planning to say a single damn word about the very recent times THEY did all of those things.
This is all about crass political opportunism, and reinforcing the claim that left-wingers have a monopoly on "righteous" political violence. When lefties use violence on YOU, it's "mostly peaceful" and you should stop whining and walk it off - even when they kill people.
Read 10 tweets
5 Jan
Doing away with public employee unions, including public school teacher unions, should be a top Republican agenda item. Stop being intimidated by the money and political connections of these unions. Take this to the court of public opinion with righteous energy and you'll win.
Public unions of any stripe are absurd and never should have been allowed for a single minute. Every Republican politician knows this, but they rarely take the case to the public, or attempt to translate the very reasonable case against these unions into legislation.
After the mad abuses of the pandemic, how can even the weakest-spined GOP legislator or candidate think the majority of voters isn't ready to hear a strong case for breaking up these unions? It's a gift-wrapped opportunity to take a bold step that would actually change things.
Read 5 tweets
4 Jan
When the Republicans take Congress next year, they should get working on an Internet Bill of Rights, and one of its provisions should include jail time for corporate employees who abuse banning and censorship tools to commit acts of political repression.
Fines aren't enough. Mega-wealthy politicized Internet platforms would find ways to pay the fines for their employees. The cost would be acceptable compared to the political advantage gained. Make the censors think long and hard about how they, personally, are in legal jeopardy.
It's very unfortunate that we need an Internet Bill of Rights, but it's painfully clear that we do. It's the least intrusive response to politicized censorship. A company that inserts itself into our elections and manipulates the outcomes is no longer a fully "private" entity.
Read 8 tweets
30 Dec 21
Late-stage pandemic response is hindered by how much the earlier stages were governed by panic, politics, and authoritarian urges. We'd be in better shape now if Americans had always been treated like rational adults capable of balancing cost and benefit, risk and reward.
Now, all of a sudden - solely and entirely because blue states where political and media elites live are experiencing huge Covid surges, and the incompetent Biden admin fell down on ordering test kits - we're talking about measuring the cost of restrictions against benefits.
Now that panic measures and authoritarian diktats have failed, and places where "sophisticated" people who "did everything right" are boiling over with new cases, suddenly it's time to ask if those protocols too harsh, if we should be counting hospitalizations instead of cases.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(