1. We are supporting a female officer @NYorksPolice They have isolated her and are denying her the fundamental right to call an expert witness. This virtue signalling mob of gangsters needs a new Chief Constable to follow the previous misogynistic PCC out the door.
2. This is the same @NYorksPolice who hosted an intersectionality conference and gave a platform to a woman hating nun. The same police who talked about the non existent 2010 Inclusion and Diversity Act. The same police who claim that 1 in 12 trans women are murdered.
3. Next week, a woman officer will be dragged to a disciplinary without representation because the @PFEW_HQ have decided she’s guilty. Fair Cop has offered to act as a friend but this has also been denied. They can’t afford to have someone in the room who is not afraid of them.
4. These world class uniformed bullies embrace every lunatic annunciation made by @LGBTpoliceuk and stand stubbornly in the trenches for Stonewall. Shame on you @CCNYP. You are now top of our list for judicial review.
5. PS. Any police officers who are interested in forming an alternative to the incompetent cowards at @PFEW_HQ, please get in touch. @threadreaderapp unroll.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
We have written to @ICSR_Centre to ask for their definition of ‘transphobia’ and whether our report falls within it. We also tried to write to Craig McLean to ask the same
But he seems to have disappeared! If anyone knows how to contact him - do please let us know. We would be interested to know what he thinks of our arguments.
.@SurreyPolice consider this a public order offence and wish to arrest the person who posted it.
Please retweet if you disagree this is a public order offence and that the police should have better things to do.
Even if this met the evidential requirements for a public order offence - and we really don’t see how it does - how is it in the public interest for the police to be investigating this?
First step is surely to make complaint to the social media site on which the picture was posted. If the site finds it does not breach terms and conditions of its use, then surely that is an end to if.
Today we find out if the insane rants of my anonymised trans accuser (the victim) is legitimised by the police. Here is a small sample (I have pages of it) of the history of police informer Mrs B. @CollegeofPolice and @CCLeeFreeman withheld it from the High Court. Wonder why?
“My partner is a Hells Angel… what’s it like to have sex with your sister?” Says anonymised police informer Mrs B…. The trans woman @CCLeeFreeman granted anonymity to.
This is the Chief whose force was compared to the Stasi, who says ‘Common sense is not appropriate for the police’ & who spent over 100k defending the right to criminalise women for saying they know the difference between lads and lasses. @Humberbeat@HumbersidePCC
This is the Chief who resolutely stands by @stonewalluk, who refuses to accept that Pride is political, and who flies this flag outside its new £14 million custody suite…
This is the Chief who covered up the history of his star witness in order to dupe the High Court into granting an anonymity order to a lunatic with a long history of threatening VaWG (sic). Watch this space.
1. Police excel at recording themselves as victims of hate but give themselves a pass when the boot’s on the other foot. ‘We investigated ourselves and our motives were found to be pure’ says @leicspolice in relation to its riot shield investigation.
2. Despite notching up 120,000 NCHIs against individual members of the public for saying stuff like ‘My cat is a Methodist’ or whistling Bob The Builder, @leicspolice have decided the rules do not apply to them.
3. That’s odd. Because @CollegeofPolice guidance insists that the police do NOT check for motive and must believe the perception of the victim. Hence @HarryTheOwl101 and @SVPhillimore both have NCHIs attached to their names for 6 years, with no possibility of appeal.