OK, so I was curious, and I played Wordle. And I have a theory about why it's so successful. The design is ingenious in a very particular way

This is a philosopher of games' theory of Wordle. A thread:
The first experience a lot of people have of Wordle is: "wait, you just *guess*? But you quickly figure out you can construct your guesses to search the space of letter-possibility, and you probably want to do that thinking about letter-frequency.
So the early experience is one of *agency expansion*. Like, you thought you had almost no agency, but you have way more than you thought.
It's a lot like limit poker. You at first think: I can do almost nothing, this is just random, I just get a random draw and all I can do is raise, check, or fold? And then you figure out how much you can do with that really narrow set of options - how much power you can have.
But the really neat stuff with Wordle is the social stuff.

First, you probably first heard about Wordle when your friends posted these incomprehensible little box-chart graphics. You played it, and now you can totally read this graphics. Cool, now you're in the know.
But the cleverest bit about Wordle is its social media presence. The best thing about Wordle is *the graphic design of the shareable Wordle chart.* There's a huge amount of information - and drama - packed into that little graph.
Every game of Wordle is a particular little arc of decisions, attempts, and failures.

But each little posted box is *a neat synopsis of somebody's else's arc of action, failure, choice, and success*.
You can just glance and see how they did, get the shape of how they tried, and see when they, say, got stuck for a while and suddenly made a bit of progress and SAW IT.
That's the really special thing about Wordle, I think. I don't know any other game that has nearly as graphically neat a synopsis, where you can just see the whole arc of another's attempt so quickly.
That wonderful bit of communication - a little encoding of agency in graphical form - combined with the decision to just give everybody the same word a day, means we can share a struggle. And you can quickly grasp the shape of each others' dramatic arc that day.
It's such a sharp, crisp, quick window into another person's agential experience.

Wordle is a triumph of social graphic design.
This is getting re-tweeted outside of my usual circle, so I guess I should add: this line of thought is based on my own philosophical theory of games, which is that games are the art form that work in the artistic medium of agency itself. More here:

Apparently because of this thread the book is sold out on Amazon?!? Oxford University Press still has some copies, and they told me they're trying to print more now...

global.oup.com/academic/produ…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with C Thi Nguyen

C Thi Nguyen Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @add_hawk

15 Dec 21
So, the American Philosophy Association awarded the 2021 Book Prize to my book, GAMES: AGENCY AS ART. I am: shocked, elated, bemused, joyous, and more than a little bewildered.

I think I get to make, like, a little acceptance speech or something? So here it is:
This book was the center of my intellectual, emotional, and spiritual life for like 7 years. I also spent the whole time pretty sure that, like, nobody would read it except for maybe half-a-dozen other weirdos like me who were already writing about the philosophy of games.
I'd actually been on the verge of giving up on philosophy. I couldn't get myself to be interested anymore in the Official Topics that I was supposed to be interested in, and I couldn't figure out how to get other people interested in the stuff I was really interested in.
Read 12 tweets
14 Dec 21
My new piece out in The Raven!

It's about how Twitter calls for intimate speech and then crushes that intimacy. About how Twitter rewards us for gambling on shared context - and then gives us the perfect tool to destroy that context.

Thread:

ravenmagazine.org/magazine/twitt…
The whole inspiration of the piece is Ted Cohen's philosophy of jokes. Cohen says: all jokes depend on some shared background knowledge. And that shared background needs to emerge as a surprise. You totally ruin the joke if you warn your audience about what they need to know.
So every joke is a trust fall. You take a gamble, a leap of faith. You're depending on the pre-existence of shared context. This is why, says, Cohen, jokes build intimacy. The point of a joke is that you're depending on somebody else to be there for you, to understand.
Read 9 tweets
11 Nov 21
The funniest argument I have ever read is Augustine's theory of sexual shame in City of God. It somehow starts with a totally reasonable question ("Why is our nudity shameful?") and ends up someplace beyond gonzo... about the agility of our genitalia in Paradise. Thread:
So here's Augustine's question: why is our nudity supposed to be shameful?

It can't be because our bodies are shameful, because they're made in God's image.
It can't be because sex is bad, because God told us to reproduce.
It can't be because pleasure is bad, because there's plenty of other pleasures that are fine.

So what is it?
Read 11 tweets
27 May 21
"The Seductions of Clarity" is now officially out!

It's about how to fake clarity - how to manipulate the *feeling* of understanding to manipulate beliefs. With two core case studies: conspiracy theories and bureaucratic language.

Thread:
cambridge.org/core/journals/…
The main idea: we are cognitively limited beings, that need to guesstimate what's worth investigating, and what's not. We need a *heuristic for terminating thought*. Because we don't have the time to investigate everything.
Proposal: many of us use the *feeling of clarity* as a heuristic for terminating thought. We use the feeling of confusion as a signal to investigate something, and the feeling of clarity as a signal that we're done.
Read 10 tweets
30 Mar 21
One of the best pieces of advice I ever got, delivered by a wise person while I was fuming over a parking ticket:

"3% of your income is for mistakes. If it's too much over, you're too sloppy. If it's too much under, you're sweating the smalls stuff too much."
The exact number should probably be varied depending on life circumstances, etc. But the idea that one can make *too few* mistakes and that this is a sign of wasted energy on diminishing returns was... profoundly transformative, and I've ended up applying it everywhere.
Related: A German friend just told me that Germany is having a much worse time with the vaccine rollout, literally because Germany is spending a huge amount of time making sure only eligible people get the vaccine, where the US has a "if a few people line-skip, eff-it" strategy.
Read 4 tweets
22 Feb 21
So I've been stuck on the camera policy for my Zoom classes. I totally get the worries about student privacy and invasiveness. But I also know that my teaching gets radically worse when I'm facing mostly all black squares. So this time, I tried complete honesty.

Report-thread:
My last term of Zoom/COVID teaching, I was totally convinced by the arguments that demanding cameras on was an invasion of privacy, that looking into a student's home life was a totally different matter from having them show up into your class.
I said, very directly, that I had no problems with cameras off. The result: all students left their cameras off, and I was left lecturing into a sea of black squares. I found this exhausting, isolating, miserable. And my teaching suffered badly, from lack of feedback.
Read 15 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(