I find it very frustrating that Djokovic - please see above - is getting more scrutiny for his "water purifying" views than his nationalism, especially with the political situation in Bosnia as it is now. I get it, the outlandish stuff is funny, but we can't ignore the above.
As I was saying to friends yesterday - it's very easy, because we watch sport for escapism, to let some of its most grim aspects go under the radar. Look at this story involving nationalism and Luka Modrić: balkaninsight.com/2018/07/17/con…
Nigel Farage is a clownish figure but we can't forget that clowns are also dangerous. There's a good chance he was attracted by the nationalism of Djokovic's father because Farage and Serbian nationalism have the same enemies. newlinesmag.com/argument/in-bo…
Re: the first tweet I posted in this thread, the #Djokovic-Australian Open standoff is a rare example of where an apparently pointless "culture war" is actually sitting on top of an extremely dangerous culture war.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Please read the above opinion piece for yourselves. It was surprisingly unsurprising. It is not alarmist, it is calmly factual, and it makes no comparison implicit or otherwise with Putin or Erdogan. It merely assesses Boris Johnson's behaviour against the rule of law.
Re: the above tweet - many of us in England are unable to recognise the early stages of authoritarian rule. We treat it as something that happens to other states - to Others - and are genuinely shocked when we are seen to promote or enable it. Exceptionalism has cost us so much.
You have people in Bosnia who need firm support from the UK as genocide deniers there grow in influence, and at precisely the same time you have a UK Prime Minister being smirking and evasive about a party he went to in lockdown. It's so grubby and degrading.
We had people in Afghanistan desperate for help and at the very same time we had a Foreign Secretary playing truant from his day job. It is such a grim joke that the UK government call themselves Global Britain. They govern for no-one but the people in their own WhatsApp group.
I will never, ever understand why people of limitless wealth go into politics. Maybe it's because their senses are so dulled by lives that are agonisingly free of struggle that they need this thrill. There seems no other reason these mediocrities would inflict themselves upon us.
1/ A key reason that my book doesn’t name names is that English political discourse is obsessed with gossip and sensationalism, with he-did-this and she-did-that, which deflects from the vital conversation about structures.
2/ Just look at the current political discourse. I’m not saying we shouldn’t name names, just that certain people who are used to being in the spotlight are experts at making the conversation all about them: instead of about the society that produces and enables them.
3/ Can I also say this: it’s easy to get caught up in the minutiae of the lives of people harming society rather than looking at the lives of people suffering that harm, which can end up in a form of sympathy for those who are doing the hurtful stuff.
2/ This proposed law isn't about Priti Patel or Boris Johnson, it goes beyond them. Just imagine this law in the hands of a yet more extreme government, doing its best to appease hard-right sections of the media and the electorate in a time of public unrest and climate collapse.
3/ What a painfully complacent country we are. We think, as a nation, that the engines we have often turned against others won't be turned inwards against us.
Remembering when many of us compared Boris Johnson’s contempt for democracy and the rule of law to that of Donald Trump, and several Very Serious People scoffed at the comparison.
Still thinking about how Boris Johnson’s speech about climate change - in which he claimed the Roman Empire fell due to uncontrolled immigration - was a beat-for-beat remake of Enoch Powell’s Rivers of Blood speech: “wars, terrible wars, and the Tiber foaming with much blood.”
Boris Johnson, on the eve of a crucial climate summit, made the UK’s endgame clear. Here’s the Rivers of Blood speech, for those who don’t know it; it was condemned at the time by Powell‘s own party leader. en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rivers_of…