The "I told you so" crowd acts as if we aren't dealing with a far-less-killy-more-spready variant (possibly engineered) in the context of lots more data, vaccines preventing almost all hospital deaths, and dramatically better treatment options.
We're seeing Dunning-Kruger on steroids as the people who were never trained in risk-management got one right-- as they often do -- with the simple rule "Everything experts/politicians do makes things worse."
But that group is only "right" because they are pairing their predictions made under situation A with outcomes happening under situation B. And no, they didn't predict situation B, except in the most obvious ways.
Our two-movies-on-one-screen reality will stay intact when the "told you so" people swarm into my comments to point out I was wrong about everything (because of my cowardice, they say) and now I am experiencing cognitive dissonance.
Test my prediction by looking in the comments to this thread for personal attacks on me and bizarre misinterpretations of what they believe I predicted. Those are tells for cognitive dissonance. Then compare to my actual predictions: shorturl.at/dotC3
As I often say, we're all walking around in our own subjective realities. The best we can do is pick a reality that predicts better than others. Let's see if I predicted the comment reaction correctly.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Scott Adams

Scott Adams Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ScottAdamsSays

3 Jan
Thread:

Capitalism is a good system because you can populate it with defective humans and it still works better than the alternatives.

Democracy (The Republic) is a good system because you can populate it with selfish and uninformed citizens and often get a good outcome.
Our justice system is good because you can put defective humans into the trial process and still get credible outcomes.
Social Media is the opposite of a good system. When you add flawed humans to social media, things only get worse.

So how could we tweak social media (and the news business) to make it more self-correcting like our better systems?
Read 7 tweets
19 Dec 21
We learned a lot during the pandemic. For example, we learned we can't tell the difference between the beginning of a pandemic and the end.
We learned that our government will lie to us if they think they have a good reason. Also, they always think they have a good reason.
We learned the difference between "the news" and an organized brainwashing operation. (Summary: There is no difference.)
Read 8 tweets
5 Dec 21
Here's the Fake News telling you in 2020 that using UV Light as a disinfectant inside the body is a bad idea and (so Trump could be wrong).

usatoday.com/story/news/fac…
Here are the trial results for using light as a disinfectant inside the body. It worked. Conclusion: Trump asked a well-informed question on a topic his own "experts" did not yet know about.

biospace.com/article/releas…
Here's the full transcript of Trump's comments about "injecting a disinfectant" inside the body. Note his references to light at the start and the end are typically edited out for the Fake News clips you have seen. Removing them changes the meaning.
Read 8 tweets
25 Nov 21
I give you the world’s shortest Thanksgiving Day play — based on a true story — in one thread:
Her: “Where did you put the turkey?”
Him: “What turkey?”
Read 4 tweets
19 Nov 21
The country's level of awareness has changed dramatically in the last few years. Examples:

We used to think it was only the other side's news that was fake.

We used to think official data was mostly honest and sufficiently accurate.
We used to think "never again" was serious. China taught us it was only a slogan.

Many people thought the 2nd amendment didn't offer any real protection from our own government. See Australia.

We used to believe some humans make decisions based on facts and reason.
We used to think courts ensured fair elections. Now we know they don't hear those cases. (The Left still thinks they do.)

We used to believe in an objective reality, but now all evidence suggests none of us can see such a thing if it exists at all. We see our own movies.
Read 4 tweets
16 Oct 21
Trump’s seemingly unhinged pounding on election “fraud” looks to most people like bad strategy for getting re-elected. But is it?
Imagine a world in which substantial fraud is someday verified in at least one precinct that flipped from Trump to Biden. Suddenly Jan 6th looks different even if it shouldn’t.
Now ask yourself how likely it is that a vast and sometimes chaotic process such as a national election could have at least one discoverable example of confirmed fraud in one precinct. Maybe 100% odds?
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(