[THREAD]

There is something potentially very big in the Stewart Rhodes indictment that has not been noticed/reported yet.

First - a story that has flown under the radar:

The Kremers had also planned a rally at the *Supreme Court* later that day.

h/t/cc @satirehat @leesgirl9
We can only speculate about the reason for the SCOTUS rally, but we do have a couple of clues.

Namely, Louie Gohmert had a lawsuit waiting for SCOTUS *on* Jan 6 - one that would make Mike Pence responsible for choosing the electors that day.

They badly wanted SCOTUS to take it.
Listen to Sidney Powell describe this in her own words.

They thought that, if Congress could be prevented from reconvening, then Alito might have picked up their case, and stopped the entire certification.

Did Pelosi play some role in slow rolling this case?
There are complexities here, and overlaps with the other parts of their plan, but that’s for another thread.

The point here is that the Kremers had planned to send the mob to *SCOTUS* that afternoon. To pressure them?

But she went to the Willard, and at 2:18, she called it off.
What does this have to do with Rhodes?

It may be nothing.

But, At 3:30pm, Rhodes messaged the Leadership Signal Chat, “Anyone in DC who is not tasked with a security detail, come yo US Capitol on the Supreme Court side. Come to Capitol on the NE corner.”

It’s worth asking why.
It may have nothing to do with the SCOTUS rally, but it’s worth asking. Did Rhodes pull the OKs from the Capitol b/c he planned to take them to SCOTUS? If so, that could expose a link to higher level planners.

If not, then why did they just stop at 3:30?

Did they get orders?
Again, this doesn’t prove anything conclusively, and may be noting at all, but it’s surely worth considering.

Also, Kremer called off the SCOTUS rally at 2:18 (it was to start at 2:00).

This thread shows what was happening around that time for reference.

h/t @AShoutOutfromMN
It’s worth noting that the plan at the Capitol was to send a crowd of angry people, then use operatives to direct their anger to overwhelm LE/security, and then have the paramilitary units form up and slip in under cover afterward, occupying the building.
If, theoretically, the same strategy was planned at SCOTUS, and the mob was supposed to arrive there at 2pm, then what time would paramilitary units like the Oath Keepers arrive?

Maybe 3:30, when Rhodes pulled his people out of the Capitol and ovet to that side of the property?
I don’t think we should rule it out.
For reference, 3:30 is around the time when parts of the mob were being subdued, and there was still heavy fighting going on as well (tunnel, north doors).

It’s possible Rhodes and his group were simply retreating.

I still think it’s worth asking. Also about the SCOTUS rally.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with ClearingTheFog

ClearingTheFog Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @clearing_fog

15 Jan
Biden just fired Darren Beattie.

He was fired as a Trump speechwriter when CNN reported that he spoke at a white nationalist conference. He promotes neo nazi protests.

He has been pushing disinfo about Jan 6.

Trump appointed him to a group related to Holocaust preservation.
Beattie has been using Revolver News to push the Ray Epps/false flag conspiracy theories, to try to provide cover to right wing insurrectionists.

Here he is helping Tucker do the same.

Until today, he still held a government position, where Trump appointed him.
Read 5 tweets
13 Jan
Today is the first time anyone has been charged with seditious conspiracy regarding Jan 6.

And the Feds also just slapped that charge (sedition) on the other targets of the ongoing Oath Keepers conspiracy case.

This only happened after they built their case up to the leader.
“The [Oath Keepers] superseding indictment has now effectively been split into three parts: the 11-defendant seditious conspiracy case, a seven-defendant original case, and a third case against one of the previously charged defendants.”

justice.gov/opa/pr/leader-…
Important

When “crowd members forced entry into the Capitol,” Rhodes then stepped onto the grounds and called his OK members over to him.

Then those OK’s formed up in a stack & went to occupy the building.

The QRFs stood by, outside the city, ready to supply them with weapons.
Read 4 tweets
13 Jan
Tony Shaffer, the fellow who has been trolling and attacking researchers on Twitter, was the “lead investigator” for the Amistad project, which was apparently involved in creating forged state elector documents, as well as in filing “Kraken” lawsuits to overturn the election.
Shaffer also sat on the Trump 2020 board, and admits that he was at the rally on January 6th.

Although he stutters quite a bit when he has to address whether Trump incited violence.

He wants us to believe that no one could have predicted that people would storm the Capitol.
Why do we suspect that the Amistad Project may have been involved with the fraudulent state elector plan?

Because they released a massive 1,400 page ‘super appendix’ of documents before January 6th.

And the fraudulent elector documents were found included in that appendix.
Read 7 tweets
6 Jan
Nearly five months ago, @Reuters published this article, which is completely false.

Right wing propagandists still use it daily, to deny that there was any coordinated effort behind the insurrection.

It needs to be retracted.

reuters.com/world/us/exclu…
I pointed out the sourcing issues the day that it was published.

Since then, the @January6thCmte themselves have completely debunked it.

And yet it still remains online, to be used by bad faith propagandists.
“It’s been made clear to us that reports of such a conclusion are baseless.”
Read 4 tweets
31 Dec 21
Since it’s almost New Years Eve, let’s have a little fun before we dive into politics. :-)

At 6:30 PST, we’re going to try something new and kick off the night with some Trivia - hosted by @lolo13251797 and @Jim2Super.

Afterward, we’ll dive back into the news.

Scroll down👇 Image
So come blow off a little steam with trivia for half an hour, then stay for the current events & politics afterward. ;-)

Join here - 6:30 PST:

twitter.com/i/spaces/1ZkKz…
Read 6 tweets
29 Dec 21
This sure is an interesting bit of heuristics on the Denver shooter.

Ngo, Cernovich, and ZubyMusic.

Stepping stones on his road to radicalization.

h/t @satirehat
And in the “Liminal Order” of this Claremont Institute Fellow.
He really liked this Peter Thiel associate who was also connected to the Claremont Institute.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(